Effects of a Thin-Sized Lead Body of a Transvenous Single Coil Defibrillation Lead on ICD Implantation

SCHUCHERT, A., et al.: Effects of a Thin-Sized Lead Body of a Transvenous Single Coil Defibrillation Lead on ICD Implantation. In the interest of patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), the clinical benefits of newer and thinner transvenous defibrillation leads have to be...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

SCHUCHERT, A., et al.: Effects of a Thin-Sized Lead Body of a Transvenous Single Coil Defibrillation Lead on ICD Implantation. In the interest of patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), the clinical benefits of newer and thinner transvenous defibrillation leads have to be determined. The aims of this study were to evaluate the ICD procedure duration and the frequency of lead dislocation at the 3-month follow-up of a new defibrillation lead with a thin-sized lead body and its conventionalsized predecessor. The thin-sized single coil defibrillation lead (Kainox RV, Biotronik; lead body 6.7 Fr) was implanted in 61 patients and the conventional-sized defibrillation lead (SPS, Biotronik; lead body 7.8 Fr) in 60 patients. Both leads were connected to a left-sided, prepectorally implanted Phylax ICD (Biotronik) with active housing. The lead implantation time and total procedure duration were determined. Lead implantation time was defined as the time from lead insertion to the end of the pacing measurements. The total procedure duration spanned skin incision to closure. The incidence of lead repositioning during the lead implantation time and during ventricular fibrillation conversion testing was also assessed. The frequency of lead dislocations was recorded at the 3-month follow-up. Mean lead implantation time and total procedure duration of the thin-sized lead (23 ± 22 minutes 76 ± 37 minutes) were not statistically different from the time needed for the conventional-sized lead (22 ± 20 minutes 81 ± 34 minutes). The number of lead repositionings during the lead implantation time was similar (thin-sized lead: 1.4 ± 2.4; conventional-sized lead: 1.1 ± 1.9). An additional lead repositioning was not necessary during ventricular fibrillation conversion testing in 93.4% of the patients with thin-sized and in 94.4% with conventional-sized leads (not significant). At the 3-month follow-up, there were four (6.6%) lead dislocations in the thin-sized and four (6.7%) in the conventional-sized lead group. In conclusion, the downsized lead body of the new defibrillation lead influenced neither ICD procedure duration nor the incidence of lead dislocation during follow-up. Ausführliche Beschreibung