Fully automated artificial intelligence-based coronary CT angiography image processing: efficiency, diagnostic capability, and risk stratification

Objectives To prospectively investigate whether fully automated artificial intelligence (FAAI)-based coronary CT angiography (CCTA) image processing is non-inferior to semi-automated mode in efficiency, diagnostic ability, and risk stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and metho...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Objectives To prospectively investigate whether fully automated artificial intelligence (FAAI)-based coronary CT angiography (CCTA) image processing is non-inferior to semi-automated mode in efficiency, diagnostic ability, and risk stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and methods Adults with indications for CCTA were prospectively and consecutively enrolled at two hospitals and randomly assigned to either FAAI-based or semi-automated image processing using equipment workstations. Outcome measures were workflow efficiency, diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD (≥ 50% stenosis), and cardiovascular events at 2-year follow-up. The endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for unstable angina, and recurrence of cardiac symptoms. The non-inferiority margin was 3 percentage difference in diagnostic accuracy and C-index. Results In total, 1801 subjects (62.7 ± 11.1 years) were included, of whom 893 and 908 were assigned to the FAAI-based and semi-automated modes, respectively. Image processing times were 121.0 ± 18.6 and 433.5 ± 68.4 s, respectively (p <0.001). Scan-to-report release times were 6.4 ± 2.7 and 10.5 ± 3.8 h, respectively (p < 0.001). Of all subjects, 152 and 159 in the FAAI-based and semi-automated modes, respectively, subsequently underwent invasive coronary angiography. The diagnostic accuracies for obstructive CAD were 94.7% (89.9–97.7%) and 94.3% (89.5–97.4%), respectively (difference 0.4%). Of all subjects, 779 and 784 in the FAAI-based and semi-automated modes were followed for 589 ± 182 days, respectively, and the C-statistic for cardiovascular events were 0.75 (0.67 to 0.83) and 0.74 (0.66 to 0.82) (difference 1%). Conclusions FAAI-based CCTA image processing significantly improves workflow efficiency than semi-automated mode, and is non-inferior in diagnosing obstructive CAD and risk stratification for cardiovascular events. Clinical relevance statement Conventional coronary CT angiography image processing is semi-automated. This observation shows that fully automated artificial intelligence-based image processing greatly improves efficiency, and maintains high diagnostic accuracy and the effectiveness in stratifying patients for cardiovascular events. Key Points • Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) relies heavily on high-quality and fast image processing. • Full-automation CCTA image processing is clinically non-inferior to the semi-automated mode. • Full automation can facilitate the application of CCTA in early detection of coronary artery disease. Ausführliche Beschreibung