Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science

Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Nieminen, Petteri - 1968- [verfasserIn] Ryökäs, Esko - 1953- [verfasserIn] Loikkanen, Juuso [verfasserIn] Mustonen, Anne-Mari [verfasserIn] Rope Kojonen, E. V. [verfasserin des bezugswerks]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial

Weitere Ausgabe:	Kritik in Rope Kojonen, E. V.: Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” - 2021
Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Theology and science - Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003, 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:18 ; year:2020 ; number:3 ; pages:448-474

Links:	Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221

Katalog-ID:	172783903X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	172783903X
003	DE-627
005	20240514092519.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	200826s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)172783903X
035			\|a (DE-599)KXP172783903X
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
084			\|a 0 \|a 1 \|2 ssgn
100	1		\|a Nieminen, Petteri \|d 1968- \|e verfasserin \|0 (DE-588)1062528840 \|0 (DE-627)805375902 \|0 (DE-576)41977212X \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction.
650		4	\|a Confirmation bias
650		4	\|a evidence
650		4	\|a falsification
650		4	\|a hyperactive agent-detection device
650		4	\|a ignosticism
650		4	\|a igtheism
650		4	\|a religion–science models
650		4	\|a testimonial
700	1		\|a Ryökäs, Esko \|d 1953- \|e verfasserin \|0 (DE-588)1021152560 \|0 (DE-627)691475377 \|0 (DE-576)164395822 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Loikkanen, Juuso \|e verfasserin \|0 (DE-588)1100888977 \|0 (DE-627)859617378 \|0 (DE-576)469821302 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Mustonen, Anne-Mari \|e verfasserin \|0 (DE-588)1062528948 \|0 (DE-627)805376178 \|0 (DE-576)419850317 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Rope Kojonen, E. V. \|e verfasserin des bezugswerks \|4 ant
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Theology and science \|d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 \|g 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)372546447 \|w (DE-600)2124364-5 \|w (DE-576)261325019 \|x 1474-6719 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:18 \|g year:2020 \|g number:3 \|g pages:448-474
787	0	8	\|i Kritik in \|a Rope Kojonen, E. V. \|t Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” \|d 2021 \|w (DE-627)1767893418
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 \|x Resolving-System \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2019
912			\|a ISIL_DE-Tue135
912			\|a SYSFLAG_1
912			\|a GBV_KXP
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2403
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2403
912			\|a ISIL_DE-LFER
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 18 \|j 2020 \|e 3 \|h 448-474
980			\|2 2019 \|1 01 \|x DE-Tü135 \|b 3743027399 \|c 00 \|f --%%-- \|d --%%-- \|e --%%-- \|j n \|y l01 \|z 26-08-20
980			\|2 2403 \|1 01 \|x DE-LFER \|b 4319019628 \|c 00 \|f --%%-- \|d --%%-- \|e n \|j --%%-- \|y l01 \|z 08-05-23
981			\|2 2403 \|1 01 \|x DE-LFER \|r https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221
983			\|2 2019 \|1 01 \|x DE-Tü135 \|8 00 \|0 (DE-627)1442042990 \|a AB
983			\|2 2019 \|1 01 \|x DE-Tü135 \|8 01 \|0 (DE-627)1442043024 \|a AE
983			\|2 2019 \|1 01 \|x DE-Tü135 \|8 02 \|0 (DE-627)1442053747 \|a ZD
983			\|2 2019 \|1 01 \|x DE-Tü135 \|8 03 \|0 (DE-627)144204389X \|a CF

Indexfelder

author_variant	p n pn e r er j l jl a m m amm
matchkey_str	article:14746719:2020----::auefvdneneiinnn
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 doi (DE-627)172783903X (DE-599)KXP172783903X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Nieminen, Petteri 1968- verfasserin (DE-588)1062528840 (DE-627)805375902 (DE-576)41977212X aut Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial Ryökäs, Esko 1953- verfasserin (DE-588)1021152560 (DE-627)691475377 (DE-576)164395822 aut Loikkanen, Juuso verfasserin (DE-588)1100888977 (DE-627)859617378 (DE-576)469821302 aut Mustonen, Anne-Mari verfasserin (DE-588)1062528948 (DE-627)805376178 (DE-576)419850317 aut Rope Kojonen, E. V. verfasserin des bezugswerks ant Enthalten in Theology and science Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 Online-Ressource (DE-627)372546447 (DE-600)2124364-5 (DE-576)261325019 1474-6719 nnns volume:18 year:2020 number:3 pages:448-474 Kritik in Rope Kojonen, E. V. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” 2021 (DE-627)1767893418 https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 18 2020 3 448-474 2019 01 DE-Tü135 3743027399 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 26-08-20 2403 01 DE-LFER 4319019628 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 08-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 2019 01 DE-Tü135 00 (DE-627)1442042990 AB 2019 01 DE-Tü135 01 (DE-627)1442043024 AE 2019 01 DE-Tü135 02 (DE-627)1442053747 ZD 2019 01 DE-Tü135 03 (DE-627)144204389X CF
spelling	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 doi (DE-627)172783903X (DE-599)KXP172783903X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Nieminen, Petteri 1968- verfasserin (DE-588)1062528840 (DE-627)805375902 (DE-576)41977212X aut Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial Ryökäs, Esko 1953- verfasserin (DE-588)1021152560 (DE-627)691475377 (DE-576)164395822 aut Loikkanen, Juuso verfasserin (DE-588)1100888977 (DE-627)859617378 (DE-576)469821302 aut Mustonen, Anne-Mari verfasserin (DE-588)1062528948 (DE-627)805376178 (DE-576)419850317 aut Rope Kojonen, E. V. verfasserin des bezugswerks ant Enthalten in Theology and science Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 Online-Ressource (DE-627)372546447 (DE-600)2124364-5 (DE-576)261325019 1474-6719 nnns volume:18 year:2020 number:3 pages:448-474 Kritik in Rope Kojonen, E. V. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” 2021 (DE-627)1767893418 https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 18 2020 3 448-474 2019 01 DE-Tü135 3743027399 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 26-08-20 2403 01 DE-LFER 4319019628 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 08-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 2019 01 DE-Tü135 00 (DE-627)1442042990 AB 2019 01 DE-Tü135 01 (DE-627)1442043024 AE 2019 01 DE-Tü135 02 (DE-627)1442053747 ZD 2019 01 DE-Tü135 03 (DE-627)144204389X CF
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 doi (DE-627)172783903X (DE-599)KXP172783903X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Nieminen, Petteri 1968- verfasserin (DE-588)1062528840 (DE-627)805375902 (DE-576)41977212X aut Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial Ryökäs, Esko 1953- verfasserin (DE-588)1021152560 (DE-627)691475377 (DE-576)164395822 aut Loikkanen, Juuso verfasserin (DE-588)1100888977 (DE-627)859617378 (DE-576)469821302 aut Mustonen, Anne-Mari verfasserin (DE-588)1062528948 (DE-627)805376178 (DE-576)419850317 aut Rope Kojonen, E. V. verfasserin des bezugswerks ant Enthalten in Theology and science Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 Online-Ressource (DE-627)372546447 (DE-600)2124364-5 (DE-576)261325019 1474-6719 nnns volume:18 year:2020 number:3 pages:448-474 Kritik in Rope Kojonen, E. V. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” 2021 (DE-627)1767893418 https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 18 2020 3 448-474 2019 01 DE-Tü135 3743027399 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 26-08-20 2403 01 DE-LFER 4319019628 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 08-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 2019 01 DE-Tü135 00 (DE-627)1442042990 AB 2019 01 DE-Tü135 01 (DE-627)1442043024 AE 2019 01 DE-Tü135 02 (DE-627)1442053747 ZD 2019 01 DE-Tü135 03 (DE-627)144204389X CF
allfieldsGer	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 doi (DE-627)172783903X (DE-599)KXP172783903X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Nieminen, Petteri 1968- verfasserin (DE-588)1062528840 (DE-627)805375902 (DE-576)41977212X aut Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial Ryökäs, Esko 1953- verfasserin (DE-588)1021152560 (DE-627)691475377 (DE-576)164395822 aut Loikkanen, Juuso verfasserin (DE-588)1100888977 (DE-627)859617378 (DE-576)469821302 aut Mustonen, Anne-Mari verfasserin (DE-588)1062528948 (DE-627)805376178 (DE-576)419850317 aut Rope Kojonen, E. V. verfasserin des bezugswerks ant Enthalten in Theology and science Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 Online-Ressource (DE-627)372546447 (DE-600)2124364-5 (DE-576)261325019 1474-6719 nnns volume:18 year:2020 number:3 pages:448-474 Kritik in Rope Kojonen, E. V. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” 2021 (DE-627)1767893418 https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 18 2020 3 448-474 2019 01 DE-Tü135 3743027399 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 26-08-20 2403 01 DE-LFER 4319019628 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 08-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 2019 01 DE-Tü135 00 (DE-627)1442042990 AB 2019 01 DE-Tü135 01 (DE-627)1442043024 AE 2019 01 DE-Tü135 02 (DE-627)1442053747 ZD 2019 01 DE-Tü135 03 (DE-627)144204389X CF
allfieldsSound	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 doi (DE-627)172783903X (DE-599)KXP172783903X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Nieminen, Petteri 1968- verfasserin (DE-588)1062528840 (DE-627)805375902 (DE-576)41977212X aut Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial Ryökäs, Esko 1953- verfasserin (DE-588)1021152560 (DE-627)691475377 (DE-576)164395822 aut Loikkanen, Juuso verfasserin (DE-588)1100888977 (DE-627)859617378 (DE-576)469821302 aut Mustonen, Anne-Mari verfasserin (DE-588)1062528948 (DE-627)805376178 (DE-576)419850317 aut Rope Kojonen, E. V. verfasserin des bezugswerks ant Enthalten in Theology and science Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 Online-Ressource (DE-627)372546447 (DE-600)2124364-5 (DE-576)261325019 1474-6719 nnns volume:18 year:2020 number:3 pages:448-474 Kritik in Rope Kojonen, E. V. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” 2021 (DE-627)1767893418 https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 18 2020 3 448-474 2019 01 DE-Tü135 3743027399 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 26-08-20 2403 01 DE-LFER 4319019628 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 08-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 2019 01 DE-Tü135 00 (DE-627)1442042990 AB 2019 01 DE-Tü135 01 (DE-627)1442043024 AE 2019 01 DE-Tü135 02 (DE-627)1442053747 ZD 2019 01 DE-Tü135 03 (DE-627)144204389X CF
language	English
source	Enthalten in Theology and science 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 volume:18 year:2020 number:3 pages:448-474
sourceStr	Enthalten in Theology and science 18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474 volume:18 year:2020 number:3 pages:448-474
format_phy_str_mv	Article
building	2019:0 2403:0
institution	findex.gbv.de
selectbib_iln_str_mv	2019@01 2403@01
topic_facet	Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Theology and science
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Nieminen, Petteri @@aut@@ Ryökäs, Esko @@aut@@ Loikkanen, Juuso @@aut@@ Mustonen, Anne-Mari @@aut@@ Rope Kojonen, E. V. @@ant@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	372546447
id	172783903X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">172783903X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240514092519.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200826s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)172783903X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP172783903X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nieminen, Petteri</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1062528840</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)805375902</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)41977212X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Confirmation bias</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">falsification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hyperactive agent-detection device</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ignosticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">igtheism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religion–science models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">testimonial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ryökäs, Esko</subfield><subfield code="d">1953-</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1021152560</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)691475377</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)164395822</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Loikkanen, Juuso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1100888977</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)859617378</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)469821302</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mustonen, Anne-Mari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1062528948</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)805376178</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)419850317</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rope Kojonen, E. V.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin des bezugswerks</subfield><subfield code="4">ant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Theology and science</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)372546447</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2124364-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)261325019</subfield><subfield code="x">1474-6719</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:448-474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="787" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Kritik in</subfield><subfield code="a">Rope Kojonen, E. V.</subfield><subfield code="t">Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science”</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1767893418</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-Tue135</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_KXP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-LFER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">448-474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="b">3743027399</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="j">n</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">26-08-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="b">4319019628</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">n</subfield><subfield code="j">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">08-05-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="981" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="r">https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">00</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1442042990</subfield><subfield code="a">AB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">01</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1442043024</subfield><subfield code="a">AE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">02</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1442053747</subfield><subfield code="a">ZD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">03</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)144204389X</subfield><subfield code="a">CF</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
standort_str_mv	--%%--
standort_iln_str_mv	2019:--%%-- DE-Tü135:--%%-- 2403:--%%-- DE-LFER:--%%--
author	Nieminen, Petteri 1968-
spellingShingle	Nieminen, Petteri 1968- ssgn 0 misc Confirmation bias misc evidence misc falsification misc hyperactive agent-detection device misc ignosticism misc igtheism misc religion–science models misc testimonial Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science
authorStr	Nieminen, Petteri 1968-
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)372546447 @@787@@(DE-627)1767893418
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
typewithnormlink_str_mv	Person@(DE-588)1062528840 DifferentiatedPerson@(DE-588)1062528840 Person@(DE-588)1021152560 DifferentiatedPerson@(DE-588)1021152560 DifferentiatedPerson@(DE-588)1100888977 Person@(DE-588)1100888977 Person@(DE-588)1062528948 DifferentiatedPerson@(DE-588)1062528948
collection	KXP SWB GVK
remote_str	true
last_changed_iln_str_mv	2019@26-08-20 2403@08-05-23
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1474-6719
notation_local_iln_str_mv	2019:AB DE-Tü135:AB 2019:AE DE-Tü135:AE 2019:ZD DE-Tü135:ZD 2019:CF DE-Tü135:CF
topic_title	0 1 ssgn Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science Confirmation bias evidence falsification hyperactive agent-detection device ignosticism igtheism religion–science models testimonial
topic	ssgn 0 misc Confirmation bias misc evidence misc falsification misc hyperactive agent-detection device misc ignosticism misc igtheism misc religion–science models misc testimonial
topic_unstemmed	ssgn 0 misc Confirmation bias misc evidence misc falsification misc hyperactive agent-detection device misc ignosticism misc igtheism misc religion–science models misc testimonial
topic_browse	ssgn 0 misc Confirmation bias misc evidence misc falsification misc hyperactive agent-detection device misc ignosticism misc igtheism misc religion–science models misc testimonial
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
standort_txtP_mv	--%%--
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Theology and science
normlinkwithtype_str_mv	(DE-588)1062528840@Person (DE-588)1062528840@DifferentiatedPerson (DE-588)1021152560@Person (DE-588)1021152560@DifferentiatedPerson (DE-588)1100888977@DifferentiatedPerson (DE-588)1100888977@Person (DE-588)1062528948@Person (DE-588)1062528948@DifferentiatedPerson
hierarchy_parent_id	372546447
signature	--%%--
signature_str_mv	--%%--
hierarchy_top_title	Theology and science
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)372546447 (DE-600)2124364-5 (DE-576)261325019
normlinkwithrole_str_mv	(DE-588)1062528840@@aut@@ (DE-588)1021152560@@aut@@ (DE-588)1100888977@@aut@@ (DE-588)1062528948@@aut@@
title	Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science
ctrlnum	(DE-627)172783903X (DE-599)KXP172783903X
title_full	Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science
author_sort	Nieminen, Petteri 1968-
journal	Theology and science
journalStr	Theology and science
callnumber-first-code	-
lang_code	eng
class_local	2019 01 DE-Tü135 00 (DE-627)1442042990 AB 2019 01 DE-Tü135 01 (DE-627)1442043024 AE 2019 01 DE-Tü135 02 (DE-627)1442053747 ZD 2019 01 DE-Tü135 03 (DE-627)144204389X CF
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	448
class_local_iln	2019:AB DE-Tü135:AB 2019:AE DE-Tü135:AE 2019:ZD DE-Tü135:ZD 2019:CF DE-Tü135:CF
author_browse	Nieminen, Petteri Ryökäs, Esko Loikkanen, Juuso Mustonen, Anne-Mari
selectkey	2019:l 2403:l
container_volume	18
class	0 1 ssgn 2019 01 DE-Tü135 00 (DE-627)1442042990 AB 2019 01 DE-Tü135 01 (DE-627)1442043024 AE 2019 01 DE-Tü135 02 (DE-627)1442053747 ZD 2019 01 DE-Tü135 03 (DE-627)144204389X CF
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Nieminen, Petteri
classname_local_iln_str_mv	2019: DE-Tü135:
doi_str_mv	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221
normlink	1062528840 805375902 41977212X 1021152560 691475377 164395822 1100888977 859617378 469821302 1062528948 805376178 419850317 1442042990 1442043024 1442053747 144204389X
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(DE-588)1062528840 (DE-627)805375902 (DE-576)41977212X (DE-588)1021152560 (DE-627)691475377 (DE-576)164395822 (DE-588)1100888977 (DE-627)859617378 (DE-576)469821302 (DE-588)1062528948 (DE-627)805376178 (DE-576)419850317 (DE-627)1442042990 (DE-627)1442043024 (DE-627)1442053747 (DE-627)144204389X
author2-role	verfasserin verfasserin des bezugswerks
title_sort	nature of evidence in religion and natural science
title_auth	Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science
abstract	Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science”
abstractGer	Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science”
abstract_unstemmed	Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science”
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER
container_issue	3
title_short	Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science
url	https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221
ausleihindikator_str_mv	2019:- 2403:n
rolewithnormlink_str_mv	@@aut@@(DE-588)1062528840 @@aut@@(DE-588)1021152560 @@aut@@(DE-588)1100888977 @@aut@@(DE-588)1062528948
remote_bool	true
author2	Ryökäs, Esko 1953- Loikkanen, Juuso Mustonen, Anne-Mari Rope Kojonen, E. V.
author2Str	Ryökäs, Esko 1953- Loikkanen, Juuso Mustonen, Anne-Mari Rope Kojonen, E. V.
ppnlink	372546447 1767893418
GND_str_mv	Nieminen, Petteri Ryökäs, E. Ryökäs, Esko Loikkanen, Juuso Mustonen, Anne-Mari
GND_txt_mv	Nieminen, Petteri Ryökäs, E. Ryökäs, Esko Loikkanen, Juuso Mustonen, Anne-Mari
GND_txtF_mv	Nieminen, Petteri Ryökäs, E. Ryökäs, Esko Loikkanen, Juuso Mustonen, Anne-Mari
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221
callnumber-a	--%%--
up_date	2024-07-05T01:16:23.081Z
_version_	1803699809767391232
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">172783903X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240514092519.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200826s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)172783903X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP172783903X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nieminen, Petteri</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1062528840</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)805375902</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)41977212X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Confirmation bias</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">falsification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hyperactive agent-detection device</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ignosticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">igtheism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religion–science models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">testimonial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ryökäs, Esko</subfield><subfield code="d">1953-</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1021152560</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)691475377</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)164395822</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Loikkanen, Juuso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1100888977</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)859617378</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)469821302</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mustonen, Anne-Mari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1062528948</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)805376178</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-576)419850317</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rope Kojonen, E. V.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin des bezugswerks</subfield><subfield code="4">ant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Theology and science</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2020), 3, Seite 448-474</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)372546447</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2124364-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)261325019</subfield><subfield code="x">1474-6719</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:448-474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="787" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Kritik in</subfield><subfield code="a">Rope Kojonen, E. V.</subfield><subfield code="t">Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science”</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1767893418</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-Tue135</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_KXP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-LFER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">448-474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="b">3743027399</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="j">n</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">26-08-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="b">4319019628</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">n</subfield><subfield code="j">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">08-05-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="981" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="r">https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">00</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1442042990</subfield><subfield code="a">AB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">01</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1442043024</subfield><subfield code="a">AE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">02</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1442053747</subfield><subfield code="a">ZD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="983" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="8">03</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)144204389X</subfield><subfield code="a">CF</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3995275

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?