Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty

In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litig...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: The review of faith & international affairs - Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005, 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:20 ; year:2022 ; number:2 ; pages:13-26

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807

Katalog-ID:	1805597612

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	1805597612
003	DE-627
005	20220602052625.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	220602s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)1805597612
035			\|a (DE-599)KXP1805597612
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
084			\|a 0 \|a 1 \|2 ssgn
100	1		\|a Reiner Platt, Elizabeth \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims.
650		4	\|a free exercise clause
650		4	\|a religious left
650		4	\|a religious progressives
650		4	\|a Christian right
650		4	\|a religious pluralism
650		4	\|a religious freedom
650		4	\|a religious liberty
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t The review of faith & international affairs \|d Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 \|g 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)662163788 \|w (DE-600)2612695-3 \|w (DE-576)346017173 \|x 1931-7743 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:20 \|g year:2022 \|g number:2 \|g pages:13-26
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 \|x Resolving-System \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2019
912			\|a ISIL_DE-Tue135
912			\|a SYSFLAG_1
912			\|a GBV_KXP
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2036
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
935			\|a mteo
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 20 \|j 2022 \|e 2 \|h 13-26
980			\|2 2019 \|1 01 \|x DE-Tü135 \|b 4142226967 \|c 00 \|f --%%-- \|d --%%-- \|e --%%-- \|j n \|y l01 \|z 02-06-22

Indexfelder

author_variant	p e r pe per
matchkey_str	article:19317743:2022----::raighcnevtvmnplorl
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 doi (DE-627)1805597612 (DE-599)KXP1805597612 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Reiner Platt, Elizabeth verfasserin aut Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims. free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty Enthalten in The review of faith & international affairs Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)662163788 (DE-600)2612695-3 (DE-576)346017173 1931-7743 nnns volume:20 year:2022 number:2 pages:13-26 https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 mteo AR 20 2022 2 13-26 2019 01 DE-Tü135 4142226967 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 02-06-22
spelling	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 doi (DE-627)1805597612 (DE-599)KXP1805597612 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Reiner Platt, Elizabeth verfasserin aut Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims. free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty Enthalten in The review of faith & international affairs Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)662163788 (DE-600)2612695-3 (DE-576)346017173 1931-7743 nnns volume:20 year:2022 number:2 pages:13-26 https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 mteo AR 20 2022 2 13-26 2019 01 DE-Tü135 4142226967 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 02-06-22
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 doi (DE-627)1805597612 (DE-599)KXP1805597612 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Reiner Platt, Elizabeth verfasserin aut Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims. free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty Enthalten in The review of faith & international affairs Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)662163788 (DE-600)2612695-3 (DE-576)346017173 1931-7743 nnns volume:20 year:2022 number:2 pages:13-26 https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 mteo AR 20 2022 2 13-26 2019 01 DE-Tü135 4142226967 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 02-06-22
allfieldsGer	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 doi (DE-627)1805597612 (DE-599)KXP1805597612 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Reiner Platt, Elizabeth verfasserin aut Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims. free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty Enthalten in The review of faith & international affairs Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)662163788 (DE-600)2612695-3 (DE-576)346017173 1931-7743 nnns volume:20 year:2022 number:2 pages:13-26 https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 mteo AR 20 2022 2 13-26 2019 01 DE-Tü135 4142226967 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 02-06-22
allfieldsSound	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 doi (DE-627)1805597612 (DE-599)KXP1805597612 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 0 1 ssgn Reiner Platt, Elizabeth verfasserin aut Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims. free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty Enthalten in The review of faith & international affairs Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)662163788 (DE-600)2612695-3 (DE-576)346017173 1931-7743 nnns volume:20 year:2022 number:2 pages:13-26 https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807 Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 mteo AR 20 2022 2 13-26 2019 01 DE-Tü135 4142226967 00 --%%-- --%%-- --%%-- n l01 02-06-22
language	English
source	Enthalten in The review of faith & international affairs 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 volume:20 year:2022 number:2 pages:13-26
sourceStr	Enthalten in The review of faith & international affairs 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26 volume:20 year:2022 number:2 pages:13-26
format_phy_str_mv	Article
building	2019:0
institution	findex.gbv.de
selectbib_iln_str_mv	2019@01
topic_facet	free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	The review of faith & international affairs
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	662163788
id	1805597612
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">1805597612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220602052625.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220602s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)1805597612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1805597612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reiner Platt, Elizabeth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">free exercise clause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious left</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious progressives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Christian right</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious pluralism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious freedom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious liberty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The review of faith & international affairs</subfield><subfield code="d">Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)662163788</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2612695-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)346017173</subfield><subfield code="x">1931-7743</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:13-26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-Tue135</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_KXP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">mteo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">13-26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="b">4142226967</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="j">n</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">02-06-22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
standort_str_mv	--%%--
standort_iln_str_mv	2019:--%%-- DE-Tü135:--%%--
author	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth
spellingShingle	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth ssgn 0 misc free exercise clause misc religious left misc religious progressives misc Christian right misc religious pluralism misc religious freedom misc religious liberty Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty
authorStr	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)662163788
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	KXP SWB GVK
remote_str	true
last_changed_iln_str_mv	2019@02-06-22
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1931-7743
topic_title	0 1 ssgn Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty free exercise clause religious left religious progressives Christian right religious pluralism religious freedom religious liberty
topic	ssgn 0 misc free exercise clause misc religious left misc religious progressives misc Christian right misc religious pluralism misc religious freedom misc religious liberty
topic_unstemmed	ssgn 0 misc free exercise clause misc religious left misc religious progressives misc Christian right misc religious pluralism misc religious freedom misc religious liberty
topic_browse	ssgn 0 misc free exercise clause misc religious left misc religious progressives misc Christian right misc religious pluralism misc religious freedom misc religious liberty
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
standort_txtP_mv	--%%--
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	The review of faith & international affairs
hierarchy_parent_id	662163788
signature	--%%--
signature_str_mv	--%%--
hierarchy_top_title	The review of faith & international affairs
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)662163788 (DE-600)2612695-3 (DE-576)346017173
title	Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty
ctrlnum	(DE-627)1805597612 (DE-599)KXP1805597612
title_full	Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty
author_sort	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth
journal	The review of faith & international affairs
journalStr	The review of faith & international affairs
callnumber-first-code	-
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	13
author_browse	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth
selectkey	2019:l
container_volume	20
class	0 1 ssgn
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Reiner Platt, Elizabeth
doi_str_mv	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807
title_sort	breaking the conservative monopoly on religious liberty
title_auth	Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty
abstract	In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims.
abstractGer	In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims.
abstract_unstemmed	In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_2019 ISIL_DE-Tue135 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 BIBCOLL_mteo
container_issue	2
title_short	Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty
url	https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807
ausleihindikator_str_mv	2019:-
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	662163788
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807
callnumber-a	--%%--
up_date	2024-07-04T19:05:51.844Z
_version_	1803676498625822720
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">1805597612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220602052625.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220602s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)1805597612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1805597612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reiner Platt, Elizabeth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">free exercise clause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious left</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious progressives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Christian right</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious pluralism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious freedom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious liberty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The review of faith & international affairs</subfield><subfield code="d">Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)662163788</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2612695-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)346017173</subfield><subfield code="x">1931-7743</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:13-26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-Tue135</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_KXP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">mteo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">13-26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2019</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-Tü135</subfield><subfield code="b">4142226967</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="j">n</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">02-06-22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398695

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?