The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Lim, Kwangsoo [verfasserIn] Jones, Wesley M. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Financial disclosure Intangible assets Regional difference Value relevance

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: International journal of finance & banking studies - Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012, 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:11 ; year:2022 ; number:4 ; month:10 ; pages:89-94

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348

Katalog-ID:	1844097978

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a2200265 4500
001	1844097978
003	DE-627
005	20230502123144.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230502s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)1844097978
035			\|a (DE-599)KXP1844097978
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Lim, Kwangsoo \|e verfasserin \|0 (DE-588)1276456689 \|0 (DE-627)1830005960 \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets \|c Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
650		4	\|a Financial disclosure \|7 (dpeaa)DE-206
650		4	\|a Intangible assets \|7 (dpeaa)DE-206
650		4	\|a Regional difference \|7 (dpeaa)DE-206
650		4	\|a Value relevance \|7 (dpeaa)DE-206
700	1		\|a Jones, Wesley M. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t International journal of finance & banking studies \|d Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012 \|g 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)751911763 \|w (DE-600)2724514-7 \|w (DE-576)391215892 \|x 2147-4486 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:11 \|g year:2022 \|g number:4 \|g month:10 \|g pages:89-94
856	4	0	\|u https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 \|x Verlag \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 \|x Resolving-System \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ILN_26
912			\|a ISIL_DE-206
912			\|a SYSFLAG_1
912			\|a GBV_KXP
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2403
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2403
912			\|a ISIL_DE-LFER
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 11 \|j 2022 \|e 4 \|c 10 \|h 89-94
980			\|2 26 \|1 01 \|x 0206 \|b 4317364921 \|y x1z \|z 02-05-23
980			\|2 2403 \|1 01 \|x DE-LFER \|b 4324072698 \|c 00 \|f --%%-- \|d --%%-- \|e n \|j --%%-- \|y l01 \|z 20-05-23
981			\|2 2403 \|1 01 \|x DE-LFER \|r https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348
981			\|2 2403 \|1 01 \|x DE-LFER \|r https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597
982			\|2 26 \|1 00 \|x DE-206 \|b We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.

Indexfelder

author_variant	k l kl w m j wm wmj
matchkey_str	article:21474486:2022----::hefcorgoadfeecsnhvleeeacpooi
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 doi (DE-627)1844097978 (DE-599)KXP1844097978 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Lim, Kwangsoo verfasserin (DE-588)1276456689 (DE-627)1830005960 aut The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Financial disclosure (dpeaa)DE-206 Intangible assets (dpeaa)DE-206 Regional difference (dpeaa)DE-206 Value relevance (dpeaa)DE-206 Jones, Wesley M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of finance & banking studies Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 Online-Ressource (DE-627)751911763 (DE-600)2724514-7 (DE-576)391215892 2147-4486 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:4 month:10 pages:89-94 https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 Verlag kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_26 ISIL_DE-206 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 11 2022 4 10 89-94 26 01 0206 4317364921 x1z 02-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER 4324072698 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 20-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 2403 01 DE-LFER https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 26 00 DE-206 We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.
spelling	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 doi (DE-627)1844097978 (DE-599)KXP1844097978 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Lim, Kwangsoo verfasserin (DE-588)1276456689 (DE-627)1830005960 aut The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Financial disclosure (dpeaa)DE-206 Intangible assets (dpeaa)DE-206 Regional difference (dpeaa)DE-206 Value relevance (dpeaa)DE-206 Jones, Wesley M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of finance & banking studies Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 Online-Ressource (DE-627)751911763 (DE-600)2724514-7 (DE-576)391215892 2147-4486 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:4 month:10 pages:89-94 https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 Verlag kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_26 ISIL_DE-206 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 11 2022 4 10 89-94 26 01 0206 4317364921 x1z 02-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER 4324072698 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 20-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 2403 01 DE-LFER https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 26 00 DE-206 We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.
allfields_unstemmed	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 doi (DE-627)1844097978 (DE-599)KXP1844097978 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Lim, Kwangsoo verfasserin (DE-588)1276456689 (DE-627)1830005960 aut The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Financial disclosure (dpeaa)DE-206 Intangible assets (dpeaa)DE-206 Regional difference (dpeaa)DE-206 Value relevance (dpeaa)DE-206 Jones, Wesley M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of finance & banking studies Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 Online-Ressource (DE-627)751911763 (DE-600)2724514-7 (DE-576)391215892 2147-4486 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:4 month:10 pages:89-94 https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 Verlag kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_26 ISIL_DE-206 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 11 2022 4 10 89-94 26 01 0206 4317364921 x1z 02-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER 4324072698 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 20-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 2403 01 DE-LFER https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 26 00 DE-206 We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.
allfieldsGer	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 doi (DE-627)1844097978 (DE-599)KXP1844097978 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Lim, Kwangsoo verfasserin (DE-588)1276456689 (DE-627)1830005960 aut The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Financial disclosure (dpeaa)DE-206 Intangible assets (dpeaa)DE-206 Regional difference (dpeaa)DE-206 Value relevance (dpeaa)DE-206 Jones, Wesley M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of finance & banking studies Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 Online-Ressource (DE-627)751911763 (DE-600)2724514-7 (DE-576)391215892 2147-4486 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:4 month:10 pages:89-94 https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 Verlag kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_26 ISIL_DE-206 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 11 2022 4 10 89-94 26 01 0206 4317364921 x1z 02-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER 4324072698 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 20-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 2403 01 DE-LFER https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 26 00 DE-206 We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.
allfieldsSound	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 doi (DE-627)1844097978 (DE-599)KXP1844097978 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Lim, Kwangsoo verfasserin (DE-588)1276456689 (DE-627)1830005960 aut The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Financial disclosure (dpeaa)DE-206 Intangible assets (dpeaa)DE-206 Regional difference (dpeaa)DE-206 Value relevance (dpeaa)DE-206 Jones, Wesley M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of finance & banking studies Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 Online-Ressource (DE-627)751911763 (DE-600)2724514-7 (DE-576)391215892 2147-4486 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:4 month:10 pages:89-94 https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 Verlag kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 Resolving-System kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_26 ISIL_DE-206 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER AR 11 2022 4 10 89-94 26 01 0206 4317364921 x1z 02-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER 4324072698 00 --%%-- --%%-- n --%%-- l01 20-05-23 2403 01 DE-LFER https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348 2403 01 DE-LFER https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 26 00 DE-206 We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.
language	English
source	Enthalten in International journal of finance & banking studies 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 volume:11 year:2022 number:4 month:10 pages:89-94
sourceStr	Enthalten in International journal of finance & banking studies 11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94 volume:11 year:2022 number:4 month:10 pages:89-94
format_phy_str_mv	Article
building	26:1 2403:0
institution	findex.gbv.de
selectbib_iln_str_mv	26@1z 2403@01
topic_facet	Financial disclosure Intangible assets Regional difference Value relevance
sw_local_iln_str_mv	26: DE-206:
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	International journal of finance & banking studies
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Lim, Kwangsoo @@aut@@ Jones, Wesley M. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-10-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	751911763
id	1844097978
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">1844097978</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502123144.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230502s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)1844097978</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1844097978</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lim, Kwangsoo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1276456689</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1830005960</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets</subfield><subfield code="c">Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Financial disclosure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intangible assets</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Regional difference</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Value relevance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Wesley M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of finance & banking studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)751911763</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2724514-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)391215892</subfield><subfield code="x">2147-4486</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_KXP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-LFER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">89-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">26</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">0206</subfield><subfield code="b">4317364921</subfield><subfield code="y">x1z</subfield><subfield code="z">02-05-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="b">4324072698</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">n</subfield><subfield code="j">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">20-05-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="981" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="r">https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="981" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="r">https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="982" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">26</subfield><subfield code="1">00</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-206</subfield><subfield code="b">We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
standort_str_mv	--%%--
standort_iln_str_mv	2403:--%%-- DE-LFER:--%%--
author	Lim, Kwangsoo
spellingShingle	Lim, Kwangsoo misc Financial disclosure misc Intangible assets misc Regional difference misc Value relevance The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets
authorStr	Lim, Kwangsoo
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)751911763
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
typewithnormlink_str_mv	Person@(DE-588)1276456689 DifferentiatedPerson@(DE-588)1276456689
collection	KXP GVK SWB
remote_str	true
last_changed_iln_str_mv	26@02-05-23 2403@20-05-23
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2147-4486
topic_title	26 00 DE-206 We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones Financial disclosure (dpeaa)DE-206 Intangible assets (dpeaa)DE-206 Regional difference (dpeaa)DE-206 Value relevance (dpeaa)DE-206
topic	misc Financial disclosure misc Intangible assets misc Regional difference misc Value relevance
topic_unstemmed	misc Financial disclosure misc Intangible assets misc Regional difference misc Value relevance
topic_browse	misc Financial disclosure misc Intangible assets misc Regional difference misc Value relevance
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
standort_txtP_mv	--%%--
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	International journal of finance & banking studies
normlinkwithtype_str_mv	(DE-588)1276456689@Person (DE-588)1276456689@DifferentiatedPerson
hierarchy_parent_id	751911763
signature	--%%--
signature_str_mv	--%%--
hierarchy_top_title	International journal of finance & banking studies
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)751911763 (DE-600)2724514-7 (DE-576)391215892
normlinkwithrole_str_mv	(DE-588)1276456689@@aut@@
title	The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets
ctrlnum	(DE-627)1844097978 (DE-599)KXP1844097978
title_full	The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones
author_sort	Lim, Kwangsoo
journal	International journal of finance & banking studies
journalStr	International journal of finance & banking studies
callnumber-first-code	-
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	89
author_browse	Lim, Kwangsoo Jones, Wesley M.
selectkey	26:x 2403:l
container_volume	11
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Lim, Kwangsoo
doi_str_mv	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348
normlink	1276456689 1830005960
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(DE-588)1276456689 (DE-627)1830005960
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets
title_auth	The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ILN_26 ISIL_DE-206 SYSFLAG_1 GBV_KXP GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_2403 ISIL_DE-LFER
container_issue	4
title_short	The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets
url	https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597 https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348
ausleihindikator_str_mv	26 2403:n
rolewithnormlink_str_mv	@@aut@@(DE-588)1276456689
remote_bool	true
author2	Jones, Wesley M.
author2Str	Jones, Wesley M.
ppnlink	751911763
GND_str_mv	Lim Kwangsoo Lim, K. Kwangsoo, Lim Lim, Kwangsoo
GND_txt_mv	Lim Kwangsoo Lim, K. Kwangsoo, Lim Lim, Kwangsoo
GND_txtF_mv	Lim Kwangsoo Lim, K. Kwangsoo, Lim Lim, Kwangsoo
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348
callnumber-a	--%%--
up_date	2024-07-04T17:09:06.361Z
_version_	1803669152845529088
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">1844097978</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502123144.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230502s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)1844097978</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1844097978</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lim, Kwangsoo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1276456689</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-627)1830005960</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets</subfield><subfield code="c">Kwangsoo Lim, Wesley M. Jones</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Financial disclosure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intangible assets</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Regional difference</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Value relevance</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Wesley M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of finance & banking studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Istanbul : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2022), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 89-94</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)751911763</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2724514-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)391215892</subfield><subfield code="x">2147-4486</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_KXP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ISIL_DE-LFER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">89-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">26</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">0206</subfield><subfield code="b">4317364921</subfield><subfield code="y">x1z</subfield><subfield code="z">02-05-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="b">4324072698</subfield><subfield code="c">00</subfield><subfield code="f">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="d">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="e">n</subfield><subfield code="j">--%%--</subfield><subfield code="y">l01</subfield><subfield code="z">20-05-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="981" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="r">https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2348</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="981" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">2403</subfield><subfield code="1">01</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-LFER</subfield><subfield code="r">https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/download/2348/1684/8597</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="982" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">26</subfield><subfield code="1">00</subfield><subfield code="x">DE-206</subfield><subfield code="b">We examine the value relevance of intangibles reported by technology firms in electronics industries and any regional difference between Southern and non-Southern firms in the relative importance of how value relevance is reported. For technology firms, the essential asset in their valuation is intellectual property, which idiosyncratic accounting practices could have either capitalized or expensed. We are interested in the intangible assets and goodwill on balance sheets and amortization expenses from income statements, which together capture the magnitude of a firm's intellectual property. We present evidence that the market value of a firm is negatively associated with the size of its intangibles but positively associated with the size of goodwill and amortization expenses. We find that this relationship between the market value of a firm and measures of intangibles is statistically stronger for Southern firms than for non-Southern firms. We interpret this finding as a manifestation of stronger accounting conservatism among Southern firms due to regional cultural differences. We find that the value relevance of intangibles weakened significantly during the 2008 financial crisis, and we interpret the intertemporal difference as a spillover effect of the stringent application of the fair value accounting standard (SFAS 157) to financial assets.</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400278

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The effect of regional differences on the value-relevance proposition for intangible assets

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?