Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs

John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment appr...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Mahdi Khayatzadeh [verfasserIn] Mansour Nasiri [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Persisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Philosophical Investigations - University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015, 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:16 ; year:2022 ; number:40 ; pages:277-291

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ000190780

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ000190780
003	DE-627
005	20230311005129.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ000190780
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a per
050		0	\|a B1-5802
100	0		\|a Mahdi Khayatzadeh \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it.
650		4	\|a religious epistemology
650		4	\|a john cottingham
650		4	\|a the epistemology of involvement
650		4	\|a non-evidentialism
650		4	\|a empathic understanding
653		0	\|a Philosophy (General)
700	0		\|a Mansour Nasiri \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Philosophical Investigations \|d University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 \|g 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 \|w (DE-627)1029475903 \|w (DE-600)2940539-7 \|x 24234419 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:16 \|g year:2022 \|g number:40 \|g pages:277-291
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 16 \|j 2022 \|e 40 \|h 277-291

Indexfelder

author_variant	m k mk m n mn
matchkey_str	article:24234419:2022----::rtcleiwfheitmlgoivleetnnesa
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	B
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000190780 (DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mahdi Khayatzadeh verfasserin aut Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it. religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding Philosophy (General) Mansour Nasiri verfasserin aut In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:16 year:2022 number:40 pages:277-291 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2022 40 277-291
spelling	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000190780 (DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mahdi Khayatzadeh verfasserin aut Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it. religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding Philosophy (General) Mansour Nasiri verfasserin aut In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:16 year:2022 number:40 pages:277-291 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2022 40 277-291
allfields_unstemmed	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000190780 (DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mahdi Khayatzadeh verfasserin aut Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it. religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding Philosophy (General) Mansour Nasiri verfasserin aut In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:16 year:2022 number:40 pages:277-291 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2022 40 277-291
allfieldsGer	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000190780 (DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mahdi Khayatzadeh verfasserin aut Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it. religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding Philosophy (General) Mansour Nasiri verfasserin aut In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:16 year:2022 number:40 pages:277-291 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2022 40 277-291
allfieldsSound	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000190780 (DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mahdi Khayatzadeh verfasserin aut Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it. religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding Philosophy (General) Mansour Nasiri verfasserin aut In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:16 year:2022 number:40 pages:277-291 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2022 40 277-291
language	English Persian
source	In Journal of Philosophical Investigations 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 volume:16 year:2022 number:40 pages:277-291
sourceStr	In Journal of Philosophical Investigations 16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291 volume:16 year:2022 number:40 pages:277-291
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding Philosophy (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Philosophical Investigations
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Mahdi Khayatzadeh @@aut@@ Mansour Nasiri @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1029475903
id	DOAJ000190780
language_de	englisch persisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ000190780</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311005129.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ000190780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahdi Khayatzadeh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious epistemology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">john cottingham</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the epistemology of involvement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-evidentialism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">empathic understanding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mansour Nasiri</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Philosophical Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1029475903</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2940539-7</subfield><subfield code="x">24234419</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:40</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:277-291</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">40</subfield><subfield code="h">277-291</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion
author	Mahdi Khayatzadeh
spellingShingle	Mahdi Khayatzadeh misc B1-5802 misc religious epistemology misc john cottingham misc the epistemology of involvement misc non-evidentialism misc empathic understanding misc Philosophy (General) Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs
authorStr	Mahdi Khayatzadeh
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1029475903
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	B1-5802
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	24234419
topic_title	B1-5802 Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs religious epistemology john cottingham the epistemology of involvement non-evidentialism empathic understanding
topic	misc B1-5802 misc religious epistemology misc john cottingham misc the epistemology of involvement misc non-evidentialism misc empathic understanding misc Philosophy (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc B1-5802 misc religious epistemology misc john cottingham misc the epistemology of involvement misc non-evidentialism misc empathic understanding misc Philosophy (General)
topic_browse	misc B1-5802 misc religious epistemology misc john cottingham misc the epistemology of involvement misc non-evidentialism misc empathic understanding misc Philosophy (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Philosophical Investigations
hierarchy_parent_id	1029475903
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Philosophical Investigations
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7
title	Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ000190780 (DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b
title_full	Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs
author_sort	Mahdi Khayatzadeh
journal	Journal of Philosophical Investigations
journalStr	Journal of Philosophical Investigations
callnumber-first-code	B
lang_code	eng per
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	277
author_browse	Mahdi Khayatzadeh Mansour Nasiri
container_volume	16
class	B1-5802
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Mahdi Khayatzadeh
doi_str_mv	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs
callnumber	B1-5802
title_auth	Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs
abstract	John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it.
abstractGer	John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it.
abstract_unstemmed	John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	40
title_short	Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs
url	https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299 https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419
remote_bool	true
author2	Mansour Nasiri
author2Str	Mansour Nasiri
ppnlink	1029475903
callnumber-subject	B - Philosophy
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299
callnumber-a	B1-5802
up_date	2024-07-03T13:28:41.749Z
_version_	1803564688874668032
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ000190780</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311005129.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ000190780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahdi Khayatzadeh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John Cottingham, a contemporary English philosopher, considers the best way to understand religious beliefs to be an empathic understanding. He calls his theory “the epistemology of involvement”. Based on this theory, in order to understand religious beliefs, one should put aside the detachment approach and by entering the life of faith, provide the conditions for the realization of the religious experiences of the believers, and at the same time, maintain the critical opinion in this sympathetic participation in religion. He considers such an approach to be a middle way between Kierkegaard's irrationalism and Plantinga's relativism and considers it generalizable to other philosophical fields. This approach faces criticism. First, before entering a religious life, it is necessary to evaluate its worldview, and this evaluation precedes the practical system and literary and emotional texts of that religion. Second, there is no connection between an empathetic understanding of religion and entering into a life of faith, and thirdly, by entering into a life of faith, the acceptance of a belief will be involuntary, and after the realization of such a belief, it is not possible to criticize it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">religious epistemology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">john cottingham</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the epistemology of involvement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-evidentialism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">empathic understanding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mansour Nasiri</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Philosophical Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2022), 40, Seite 277-291</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1029475903</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2940539-7</subfield><subfield code="x">24234419</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:40</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:277-291</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.52570.3299</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/699474224407462a9bb0bc6027d27f4b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15185_ffdd3cfddea254b3f6d1d9147cae215a.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">40</subfield><subfield code="h">277-291</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4017563

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Critical review of “the epistemology of involvement” in understanding religious beliefs

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?