Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law
Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
abbas moazzen [verfasserIn] Majid ghoorchi Beygi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Persisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī - Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017, 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:6 ; year:2017 ; number:20 ; pages:105-140 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ000348279 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ000348279 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230311010119.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||per c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ000348279 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a per | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K5000-5582 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a abbas moazzen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a K | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Criminal law and procedure | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Majid ghoorchi Beygi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī |d Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 |g 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000034452 |x 24766224 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2017 |g number:20 |g pages:105-140 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 6 |j 2017 |e 20 |h 105-140 | ||
| author_variant |
a m am m g b mgb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24766224:2017----::etnigceecmaaieprahorn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
K |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000348279 (DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per K5000-5582 abbas moazzen verfasserin aut Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing Law K Criminal law and procedure Majid ghoorchi Beygi verfasserin aut In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 (DE-627)DOAJ000034452 24766224 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:20 pages:105-140 https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 kostenfrei http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 20 105-140 |
| spelling |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000348279 (DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per K5000-5582 abbas moazzen verfasserin aut Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing Law K Criminal law and procedure Majid ghoorchi Beygi verfasserin aut In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 (DE-627)DOAJ000034452 24766224 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:20 pages:105-140 https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 kostenfrei http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 20 105-140 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000348279 (DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per K5000-5582 abbas moazzen verfasserin aut Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing Law K Criminal law and procedure Majid ghoorchi Beygi verfasserin aut In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 (DE-627)DOAJ000034452 24766224 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:20 pages:105-140 https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 kostenfrei http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 20 105-140 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000348279 (DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per K5000-5582 abbas moazzen verfasserin aut Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing Law K Criminal law and procedure Majid ghoorchi Beygi verfasserin aut In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 (DE-627)DOAJ000034452 24766224 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:20 pages:105-140 https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 kostenfrei http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 20 105-140 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 doi (DE-627)DOAJ000348279 (DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per K5000-5582 abbas moazzen verfasserin aut Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing Law K Criminal law and procedure Majid ghoorchi Beygi verfasserin aut In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 (DE-627)DOAJ000034452 24766224 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:20 pages:105-140 https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 kostenfrei http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 20 105-140 |
| language |
Persian |
| source |
In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 volume:6 year:2017 number:20 pages:105-140 |
| sourceStr |
In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī 6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140 volume:6 year:2017 number:20 pages:105-140 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing Law K Criminal law and procedure |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
abbas moazzen @@aut@@ Majid ghoorchi Beygi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ000034452 |
| id |
DOAJ000348279 |
| language_de |
persisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ000348279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311010119.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ000348279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K5000-5582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">abbas moazzen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Criminal law and procedure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Majid ghoorchi Beygi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī</subfield><subfield code="d">Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000034452</subfield><subfield code="x">24766224</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:20</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:105-140</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">20</subfield><subfield code="h">105-140</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| author |
abbas moazzen |
| spellingShingle |
abbas moazzen misc K5000-5582 misc sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing misc Law misc K misc Criminal law and procedure Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law |
| authorStr |
abbas moazzen |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ000034452 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
K5000-5582 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24766224 |
| topic_title |
K5000-5582 Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing |
| topic |
misc K5000-5582 misc sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing misc Law misc K misc Criminal law and procedure |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc K5000-5582 misc sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing misc Law misc K misc Criminal law and procedure |
| topic_browse |
misc K5000-5582 misc sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing misc Law misc K misc Criminal law and procedure |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ000034452 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ000034452 |
| title |
Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ000348279 (DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 |
| title_full |
Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law |
| author_sort |
abbas moazzen |
| journal |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī |
| journalStr |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī |
| callnumber-first-code |
K |
| lang_code |
per |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
105 |
| author_browse |
abbas moazzen Majid ghoorchi Beygi |
| container_volume |
6 |
| class |
K5000-5582 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
abbas moazzen |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
sentencing schemes: comparative approach to iran and uk criminal law |
| callnumber |
K5000-5582 |
| title_auth |
Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law |
| abstract |
Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. |
| abstractGer |
Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
20 |
| title_short |
Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19 http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Majid ghoorchi Beygi |
| author2Str |
Majid ghoorchi Beygi |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ000034452 |
| callnumber-subject |
K - General Law |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185 |
| callnumber-a |
K5000-5582 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:15:10.346Z |
| _version_ |
1803567612926361600 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ000348279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311010119.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ000348279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K5000-5582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">abbas moazzen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sentencing Schemes: Comparative Approach to Iran and UK Criminal Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sentencing is the most important process in criminal law. On the other hand, the state can have more intervention and force to its citizens. Sentencing not only is the most controversial and sensitive area of criminal law but also is the vaguest area in criminal justice system. Sentencing is not as easy as it appears. Each crime, each criminal, each criminal trial is completely different from another one. Sentencing is an important concern for those who seek the judicial reforms. Recently, in the most countries around the world, the sentencing practices became reformed and sentencing based on gender, race, ethnic, socio-economic statues disappeared to some extent. There are four important schemes of sentencing: definite sentencing, indefinite sentencing, presumptive sentencing, and mandatory sentencing. This article tries to explore these schemes and explain the characteristics of each scheme. This article has comparative approach to UK criminal justice system and Iran criminal justice system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sentencing; sentencing schemes; definite sentencing; presumptive sentencing; mandatory sentencing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Criminal law and procedure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Majid ghoorchi Beygi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī</subfield><subfield code="d">Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2017), 20, Seite 105-140</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000034452</subfield><subfield code="x">24766224</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:20</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:105-140</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/JCLR.2017.10525.1185</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6e4eba961db943b3a4eacbffc2244b19</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://jclr.atu.ac.ir/article_7834_dfc6709f451909aeac4c47f520280c85.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-3575</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">20</subfield><subfield code="h">105-140</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399666 |