The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion
Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Mazdak Rajabi [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Persisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Philosophical Investigations - University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015, 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2020 ; number:32 ; pages:239-251 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ00037511X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ00037511X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230311010339.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ00037511X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a per | ||
050 | 0 | |a B1-5802 | |
100 | 0 | |a Mazdak Rajabi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. | ||
650 | 4 | |a the kingdom of ends | |
650 | 4 | |a unsocial sociability | |
650 | 4 | |a ethical state | |
650 | 4 | |a kingdom of virtue | |
650 | 4 | |a kingdom of good principle | |
653 | 0 | |a Philosophy (General) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Philosophical Investigations |d University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 |g 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 |w (DE-627)1029475903 |w (DE-600)2940539-7 |x 24234419 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2020 |g number:32 |g pages:239-251 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2020 |e 32 |h 239-251 |
author_variant |
m r mr |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:24234419:2020----::hkndmfnsopeesvacutfatpioohohso |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
callnumber-subject-code |
B |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00037511X (DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mazdak Rajabi verfasserin aut The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. the kingdom of ends unsocial sociability ethical state kingdom of virtue kingdom of good principle Philosophy (General) In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:14 year:2020 number:32 pages:239-251 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2020 32 239-251 |
spelling |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00037511X (DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mazdak Rajabi verfasserin aut The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. the kingdom of ends unsocial sociability ethical state kingdom of virtue kingdom of good principle Philosophy (General) In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:14 year:2020 number:32 pages:239-251 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2020 32 239-251 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00037511X (DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mazdak Rajabi verfasserin aut The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. the kingdom of ends unsocial sociability ethical state kingdom of virtue kingdom of good principle Philosophy (General) In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:14 year:2020 number:32 pages:239-251 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2020 32 239-251 |
allfieldsGer |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00037511X (DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mazdak Rajabi verfasserin aut The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. the kingdom of ends unsocial sociability ethical state kingdom of virtue kingdom of good principle Philosophy (General) In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:14 year:2020 number:32 pages:239-251 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2020 32 239-251 |
allfieldsSound |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00037511X (DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng per B1-5802 Mazdak Rajabi verfasserin aut The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. the kingdom of ends unsocial sociability ethical state kingdom of virtue kingdom of good principle Philosophy (General) In Journal of Philosophical Investigations University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 (DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 24234419 nnns volume:14 year:2020 number:32 pages:239-251 https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 kostenfrei https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2020 32 239-251 |
language |
English Persian |
source |
In Journal of Philosophical Investigations 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 volume:14 year:2020 number:32 pages:239-251 |
sourceStr |
In Journal of Philosophical Investigations 14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251 volume:14 year:2020 number:32 pages:239-251 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
the kingdom of ends unsocial sociability ethical state kingdom of virtue kingdom of good principle Philosophy (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mazdak Rajabi @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1029475903 |
id |
DOAJ00037511X |
language_de |
englisch persisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ00037511X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311010339.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ00037511X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mazdak Rajabi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the kingdom of ends</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unsocial sociability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ethical state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">kingdom of virtue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">kingdom of good principle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Philosophical Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1029475903</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2940539-7</subfield><subfield code="x">24234419</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:32</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:239-251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">32</subfield><subfield code="h">239-251</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
author |
Mazdak Rajabi |
spellingShingle |
Mazdak Rajabi misc B1-5802 misc the kingdom of ends misc unsocial sociability misc ethical state misc kingdom of virtue misc kingdom of good principle misc Philosophy (General) The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion |
authorStr |
Mazdak Rajabi |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1029475903 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
B1-5802 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
24234419 |
topic_title |
B1-5802 The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion the kingdom of ends unsocial sociability ethical state kingdom of virtue kingdom of good principle |
topic |
misc B1-5802 misc the kingdom of ends misc unsocial sociability misc ethical state misc kingdom of virtue misc kingdom of good principle misc Philosophy (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc B1-5802 misc the kingdom of ends misc unsocial sociability misc ethical state misc kingdom of virtue misc kingdom of good principle misc Philosophy (General) |
topic_browse |
misc B1-5802 misc the kingdom of ends misc unsocial sociability misc ethical state misc kingdom of virtue misc kingdom of good principle misc Philosophy (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1029475903 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1029475903 (DE-600)2940539-7 |
title |
The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ00037511X (DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 |
title_full |
The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion |
author_sort |
Mazdak Rajabi |
journal |
Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
journalStr |
Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
callnumber-first-code |
B |
lang_code |
eng per |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
239 |
author_browse |
Mazdak Rajabi |
container_volume |
14 |
class |
B1-5802 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Mazdak Rajabi |
doi_str_mv |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 |
title_sort |
kingdom of ends: comprehensive account of kant’s philosophy of history with regard to religion |
callnumber |
B1-5802 |
title_auth |
The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion |
abstract |
Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. |
abstractGer |
Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
32 |
title_short |
The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion |
url |
https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5 https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960 https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1029475903 |
callnumber-subject |
B - Philosophy |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238 |
callnumber-a |
B1-5802 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:23:34.533Z |
_version_ |
1803568141605797888 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ00037511X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311010339.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ00037511X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mazdak Rajabi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Kingdom of Ends: Comprehensive Account of Kant’s Philosophy of History with Regard to Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kant’s method on moral philosophy follows his general way of philosophizing, i.e. transcendental method. That is to say, he discovers formal conditions of moral action through the transcendental analysis rather than focusing on non-rational motivations. However, it would seem to be the case that his concept of the human being as “the end-in- itself”, “the kingdom of ends”, should be understood within a Kantian big picture which is the practical aspect of human existence. Firstly, I elucidate Kant’s idea of the kingdom of ends which is the idea of the humanity as end in itself with respect to moral dimension; secondly, I clarify its political dimension and, to some extent, its legal implications; thirdly, I delineate its religious implications; finally, the kingdom of ends is considered within Kant’s philosophy of history where I evince its final sense. Therefore, Kant’s practical philosophy is taken to be accounted as a comprehensive whole based upon the kingdom of ends, although it is not a systematic whole similar to Hegelian system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the kingdom of ends</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unsocial sociability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ethical state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">kingdom of virtue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">kingdom of good principle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Philosophical Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2020), 32, Seite 239-251</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1029475903</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2940539-7</subfield><subfield code="x">24234419</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:32</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:239-251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.31903.2238</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8e8bf7d56001418f8661b0ad284531d5</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10394_df5acf03dbf14d5ca9740319fed64557.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7960</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2423-4419</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">32</subfield><subfield code="h">239-251</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4012156 |