L’urgence comme chronopolitique
The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Edouard Gardella [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Französisch |
Erschienen: |
2014 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Temporalités - ADR Temporalités, 2010, 19(2014) |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:19 ; year:2014 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ001249924 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ001249924 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309162150.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4000/temporalites.2764 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ001249924 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a fre | ||
100 | 0 | |a Edouard Gardella |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a L’urgence comme chronopolitique |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Emergency policies | |
650 | 4 | |a social emergency | |
650 | 4 | |a duration of shelter stays | |
650 | 4 | |a chronopolitics | |
650 | 4 | |a institutional temporalities | |
650 | 4 | |a individual temporalities | |
653 | 0 | |a Social Sciences | |
653 | 0 | |a H | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Temporalités |d ADR Temporalités, 2010 |g 19(2014) |w (DE-627)61362758X |w (DE-600)2524196-5 |x 21025878 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2014 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2086 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 19 |j 2014 |
author_variant |
e g eg |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21025878:2014----::ugneomcrnp |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 doi (DE-627)DOAJ001249924 (DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb fre Edouard Gardella verfasserin aut L’urgence comme chronopolitique 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. Emergency policies social emergency duration of shelter stays chronopolitics institutional temporalities individual temporalities Social Sciences H In Temporalités ADR Temporalités, 2010 19(2014) (DE-627)61362758X (DE-600)2524196-5 21025878 nnns volume:19 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2014 |
spelling |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 doi (DE-627)DOAJ001249924 (DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb fre Edouard Gardella verfasserin aut L’urgence comme chronopolitique 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. Emergency policies social emergency duration of shelter stays chronopolitics institutional temporalities individual temporalities Social Sciences H In Temporalités ADR Temporalités, 2010 19(2014) (DE-627)61362758X (DE-600)2524196-5 21025878 nnns volume:19 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2014 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 doi (DE-627)DOAJ001249924 (DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb fre Edouard Gardella verfasserin aut L’urgence comme chronopolitique 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. Emergency policies social emergency duration of shelter stays chronopolitics institutional temporalities individual temporalities Social Sciences H In Temporalités ADR Temporalités, 2010 19(2014) (DE-627)61362758X (DE-600)2524196-5 21025878 nnns volume:19 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2014 |
allfieldsGer |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 doi (DE-627)DOAJ001249924 (DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb fre Edouard Gardella verfasserin aut L’urgence comme chronopolitique 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. Emergency policies social emergency duration of shelter stays chronopolitics institutional temporalities individual temporalities Social Sciences H In Temporalités ADR Temporalités, 2010 19(2014) (DE-627)61362758X (DE-600)2524196-5 21025878 nnns volume:19 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2014 |
allfieldsSound |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 doi (DE-627)DOAJ001249924 (DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb fre Edouard Gardella verfasserin aut L’urgence comme chronopolitique 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. Emergency policies social emergency duration of shelter stays chronopolitics institutional temporalities individual temporalities Social Sciences H In Temporalités ADR Temporalités, 2010 19(2014) (DE-627)61362758X (DE-600)2524196-5 21025878 nnns volume:19 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2014 |
language |
French |
source |
In Temporalités 19(2014) volume:19 year:2014 |
sourceStr |
In Temporalités 19(2014) volume:19 year:2014 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Emergency policies social emergency duration of shelter stays chronopolitics institutional temporalities individual temporalities Social Sciences H |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Temporalités |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Edouard Gardella @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
61362758X |
id |
DOAJ001249924 |
language_de |
franzoesisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ001249924</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309162150.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/temporalites.2764</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ001249924</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Edouard Gardella</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L’urgence comme chronopolitique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency policies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social emergency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">duration of shelter stays</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">chronopolitics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">institutional temporalities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">individual temporalities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Temporalités</subfield><subfield code="d">ADR Temporalités, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2014)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)61362758X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2524196-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21025878</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Edouard Gardella |
spellingShingle |
Edouard Gardella misc Emergency policies misc social emergency misc duration of shelter stays misc chronopolitics misc institutional temporalities misc individual temporalities misc Social Sciences misc H L’urgence comme chronopolitique |
authorStr |
Edouard Gardella |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)61362758X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
21025878 |
topic_title |
L’urgence comme chronopolitique Emergency policies social emergency duration of shelter stays chronopolitics institutional temporalities individual temporalities |
topic |
misc Emergency policies misc social emergency misc duration of shelter stays misc chronopolitics misc institutional temporalities misc individual temporalities misc Social Sciences misc H |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Emergency policies misc social emergency misc duration of shelter stays misc chronopolitics misc institutional temporalities misc individual temporalities misc Social Sciences misc H |
topic_browse |
misc Emergency policies misc social emergency misc duration of shelter stays misc chronopolitics misc institutional temporalities misc individual temporalities misc Social Sciences misc H |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Temporalités |
hierarchy_parent_id |
61362758X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Temporalités |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)61362758X (DE-600)2524196-5 |
title |
L’urgence comme chronopolitique |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ001249924 (DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 |
title_full |
L’urgence comme chronopolitique |
author_sort |
Edouard Gardella |
journal |
Temporalités |
journalStr |
Temporalités |
lang_code |
fre |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Edouard Gardella |
container_volume |
19 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Edouard Gardella |
doi_str_mv |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 |
title_sort |
l’urgence comme chronopolitique |
title_auth |
L’urgence comme chronopolitique |
abstract |
The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. |
abstractGer |
The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
L’urgence comme chronopolitique |
url |
https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764 https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2 http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764 https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006 https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
61362758X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.4000/temporalites.2764 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:18:30.979Z |
_version_ |
1803586697670164480 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ001249924</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309162150.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/temporalites.2764</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ001249924</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Edouard Gardella</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L’urgence comme chronopolitique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The public problem of housing exclusion has been regulated in France since the nineteen-eighties through a specific form of policy, known as social emergency. Before 2007, homeless people using emergency shelters suffered from the exclusive provision of short-period stays and consequently had a hard time planning their lives. The interaction between institutional and individual temporalities can be conceptualized as chronopolitics. Because of its exhausting effects on the homeless, chronopolitics was denounced by activists who demanded that continuous stays in shelters, adapted to specific needs, be considered a right. That new temporal ecology was promoted by a law passed in 2007. However, as a legal right it has remained ineffective to this day. Explanations are to be found at several levels of public policy: due to the scarcity of provision, emergency shelter managers resort to restricting the length of stays; structural scarcity is artificially maintained by restrictive State policy, which seeks to limit the demands made by the large number of people in difficulty; social workers feel uncomfortable about people considering the continuous use of shelters an unconditional right. The opportunity to benefit from continuous, non-commodified housing suffers from a lack of legitimacy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency policies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social emergency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">duration of shelter stays</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">chronopolitics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">institutional temporalities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">individual temporalities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Temporalités</subfield><subfield code="d">ADR Temporalités, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2014)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)61362758X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2524196-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21025878</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.2764</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/568f9a9f0446465f8bdfd63dfe6e15b2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/2764</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1777-9006</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2102-5878</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.398546 |