Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth wer...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Aditi Jain [verfasserIn] Asmita Singh Gupta [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Endodontology - Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018, 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:31 ; year:2019 ; number:2 ; pages:163-167 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ002204762 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ002204762 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307021932.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RK1-715 | |
100 | 0 | |a Aditi Jain |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. | ||
650 | 4 | |a cone-beam computed tomography | |
650 | 4 | |a m wire | |
650 | 4 | |a root canal anatomy | |
650 | 4 | |a root canal curvature | |
653 | 0 | |a Dentistry | |
700 | 0 | |a Asmita Singh Gupta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Endodontology |d Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 |g 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 |w (DE-627)382923960 |w (DE-600)2139497-0 |x 25430831 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:163-167 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 31 |j 2019 |e 2 |h 163-167 |
author_variant |
a j aj a s g asg |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:25430831:2019----::vlainfaatasottoatrotaaisrmnaincmaaienirsuy |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RK |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167 |
spelling |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167 |
allfieldsGer |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167 |
allfieldsSound |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167 |
language |
English |
source |
In Endodontology 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 |
sourceStr |
In Endodontology 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Endodontology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Aditi Jain @@aut@@ Asmita Singh Gupta @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
382923960 |
id |
DOAJ002204762 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ002204762</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307021932.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ002204762</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aditi Jain</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">m wire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal anatomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal curvature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Asmita Singh Gupta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Endodontology</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)382923960</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2139497-0</subfield><subfield code="x">25430831</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:163-167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">163-167</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Aditi Jain |
spellingShingle |
Aditi Jain misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography |
authorStr |
Aditi Jain |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)382923960 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RK1-715 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
25430831 |
topic_title |
RK1-715 Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature |
topic |
misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry |
topic_browse |
misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Endodontology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
382923960 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Endodontology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 |
title |
Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 |
title_full |
Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography |
author_sort |
Aditi Jain |
journal |
Endodontology |
journalStr |
Endodontology |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
163 |
author_browse |
Aditi Jain Asmita Singh Gupta |
container_volume |
31 |
class |
RK1-715 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Aditi Jain |
doi_str_mv |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography |
callnumber |
RK1-715 |
title_auth |
Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography |
abstract |
Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. |
abstractGer |
Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography |
url |
https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Asmita Singh Gupta |
author2Str |
Asmita Singh Gupta |
ppnlink |
382923960 |
callnumber-subject |
RK - Dentistry |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 |
callnumber-a |
RK1-715 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:17:52.677Z |
_version_ |
1803605531875606528 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ002204762</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307021932.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ002204762</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aditi Jain</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">m wire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal anatomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal curvature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Asmita Singh Gupta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Endodontology</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)382923960</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2139497-0</subfield><subfield code="x">25430831</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:163-167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">163-167</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399932 |