Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography

Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth wer...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Aditi Jain [verfasserIn] Asmita Singh Gupta [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Endodontology - Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018, 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:31 ; year:2019 ; number:2 ; pages:163-167

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ002204762

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ002204762
003	DE-627
005	20230307021932.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ002204762
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RK1-715
100	0		\|a Aditi Jain \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.
650		4	\|a cone-beam computed tomography
650		4	\|a m wire
650		4	\|a root canal anatomy
650		4	\|a root canal curvature
653		0	\|a Dentistry
700	0		\|a Asmita Singh Gupta \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Endodontology \|d Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 \|g 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 \|w (DE-627)382923960 \|w (DE-600)2139497-0 \|x 25430831 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:31 \|g year:2019 \|g number:2 \|g pages:163-167
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 31 \|j 2019 \|e 2 \|h 163-167

Indexfelder

author_variant	a j aj a s g asg
matchkey_str	article:25430831:2019----::vlainfaatasottoatrotaaisrmnaincmaaienirsuy
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
callnumber-subject-code	RK
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167
spelling	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167
allfields_unstemmed	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167
allfieldsGer	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167
allfieldsSound	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Aditi Jain verfasserin aut Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc. cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry Asmita Singh Gupta verfasserin aut In Endodontology Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 (DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0 25430831 nnns volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167 https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 kostenfrei http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 31 2019 2 163-167
language	English
source	In Endodontology 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167
sourceStr	In Endodontology 31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167 volume:31 year:2019 number:2 pages:163-167
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature Dentistry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Endodontology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Aditi Jain @@aut@@ Asmita Singh Gupta @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	382923960
id	DOAJ002204762
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ002204762</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307021932.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ002204762</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aditi Jain</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">m wire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal anatomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal curvature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Asmita Singh Gupta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Endodontology</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)382923960</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2139497-0</subfield><subfield code="x">25430831</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:163-167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">163-167</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Aditi Jain
spellingShingle	Aditi Jain misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
authorStr	Aditi Jain
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)382923960
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RK1-715
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	25430831
topic_title	RK1-715 Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography cone-beam computed tomography m wire root canal anatomy root canal curvature
topic	misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry
topic_unstemmed	misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry
topic_browse	misc RK1-715 misc cone-beam computed tomography misc m wire misc root canal anatomy misc root canal curvature misc Dentistry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Endodontology
hierarchy_parent_id	382923960
hierarchy_top_title	Endodontology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)382923960 (DE-600)2139497-0
title	Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ002204762 (DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8
title_full	Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
author_sort	Aditi Jain
journal	Endodontology
journalStr	Endodontology
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	163
author_browse	Aditi Jain Asmita Singh Gupta
container_volume	31
class	RK1-715
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Aditi Jain
doi_str_mv	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
callnumber	RK1-715
title_auth	Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
abstract	Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.
abstractGer	Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.
abstract_unstemmed	Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography
url	https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18 https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8 http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212
remote_bool	true
author2	Asmita Singh Gupta
author2Str	Asmita Singh Gupta
ppnlink	382923960
callnumber-subject	RK - Dentistry
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.4103/endo.endo_103_18
callnumber-a	RK1-715
up_date	2024-07-04T00:17:52.677Z
_version_	1803605531875606528
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ002204762</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307021932.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ002204762</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aditi Jain</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim: Reciproc and WaveOne (WO) system was used to evaluate the canal centering ability and apical transportation by cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scans of all teeth were taken; canal curvatures were calculated; and the samples were randomly divided into two groups with 20 samples in each group, where Group 1-Reciproc system and Group 2-WO reciprocation system. Postinstrumentation scans were performed using DICOM software and the two scans were compared to determine centering ability and canal transportation at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the root apex. Results: Using Student's unpaired t-test results were as follows, for centering ability Group 1 showed nonstatistically significant difference at 3 mm and 9 mm, whereas a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 6 mm was obtained. For canal transportation, Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) at 3 mm and 6 mm, and nonsignificant difference was obtained at 9 mm, but for Group 2, nonstatistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was obtained at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Conclusion: WO single reciprocation file has better centering ability, maintains original canal curvature, and causes lesser canal transportation as compared to reciproc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cone-beam computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">m wire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal anatomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">root canal curvature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Asmita Singh Gupta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Endodontology</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2019), 2, Seite 163-167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)382923960</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2139497-0</subfield><subfield code="x">25430831</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:163-167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_103_18</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/07ae21a72bd340ef9abcf4bb1041e8b8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jain</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0970-7212</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">163-167</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399932

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Evaluation of canal transportation after root canal instrumentation a comparative in vitro study with cone-beam computed tomography

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?