Judgment by failure to appear

The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the defaul...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Salma Marija [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; srp

Erschienen:	2012

Schlagwörter:	judgment by failure to appear default judgment

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu - University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017, 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:46 ; year:2012 ; number:2 ; pages:143-156

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ004673549

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ004673549
003	DE-627
005	20230309184300.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ004673549
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a srp
100	0		\|a Salma Marija \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Judgment by failure to appear
264		1	\|c 2012
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.
650		4	\|a judgment by failure to appear
650		4	\|a default judgment
653		0	\|a Law
653		0	\|a K
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu \|d University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 \|g 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 \|w (DE-627)627314120 \|w (DE-600)2557007-9 \|x 24061255 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:46 \|g year:2012 \|g number:2 \|g pages:143-156
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4753
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 46 \|j 2012 \|e 2 \|h 143-156

Indexfelder

author_variant	s m sm
matchkey_str	article:24061255:2012----::ugetyalrt
hierarchy_sort_str	2012
publishDate	2012
allfields	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156
spelling	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156
allfields_unstemmed	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156
allfieldsGer	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156
allfieldsSound	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156
language	English
source	In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156
sourceStr	In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Salma Marija @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	627314120
id	DOAJ004673549
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ004673549</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309184300.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ004673549</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salma Marija</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">default judgment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)627314120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2557007-9</subfield><subfield code="x">24061255</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:143-156</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">143-156</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Salma Marija
spellingShingle	Salma Marija misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K Judgment by failure to appear
authorStr	Salma Marija
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)627314120
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	24061255
topic_title	Judgment by failure to appear judgment by failure to appear default judgment
topic	misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K
topic_unstemmed	misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K
topic_browse	misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
hierarchy_parent_id	627314120
hierarchy_top_title	Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9
title	Judgment by failure to appear
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db
title_full	Judgment by failure to appear
author_sort	Salma Marija
journal	Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
journalStr	Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
lang_code	eng srp
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2012
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	143
author_browse	Salma Marija
container_volume	46
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Salma Marija
doi_str_mv	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572
title_sort	judgment by failure to appear
title_auth	Judgment by failure to appear
abstract	The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.
abstractGer	The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.
abstract_unstemmed	The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753
container_issue	2
title_short	Judgment by failure to appear
url	https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	627314120
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.5937/zrpfns46-2572
up_date	2024-07-04T00:41:03.293Z
_version_	1803606990043217920
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ004673549</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309184300.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ004673549</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salma Marija</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">default judgment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)627314120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2557007-9</subfield><subfield code="x">24061255</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:143-156</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">143-156</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400585

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Judgment by failure to appear

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?