Judgment by failure to appear
The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the defaul...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Salma Marija [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; srp |
Erschienen: |
2012 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu - University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017, 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:46 ; year:2012 ; number:2 ; pages:143-156 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ004673549 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ004673549 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309184300.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a srp | ||
100 | 0 | |a Salma Marija |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judgment by failure to appear |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. | ||
650 | 4 | |a judgment by failure to appear | |
650 | 4 | |a default judgment | |
653 | 0 | |a Law | |
653 | 0 | |a K | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |d University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 |g 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 |w (DE-627)627314120 |w (DE-600)2557007-9 |x 24061255 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g pages:143-156 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4753 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 46 |j 2012 |e 2 |h 143-156 |
author_variant |
s m sm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:24061255:2012----::ugetyalrt |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
publishDate |
2012 |
allfields |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156 |
spelling |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156 |
allfieldsGer |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156 |
allfieldsSound |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 doi (DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp Salma Marija verfasserin aut Judgment by failure to appear 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 (DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 24061255 nnns volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db kostenfrei http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 46 2012 2 143-156 |
language |
English |
source |
In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 |
sourceStr |
In Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu 46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156 volume:46 year:2012 number:2 pages:143-156 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
judgment by failure to appear default judgment Law K |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Salma Marija @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
627314120 |
id |
DOAJ004673549 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ004673549</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309184300.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ004673549</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salma Marija</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">default judgment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)627314120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2557007-9</subfield><subfield code="x">24061255</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:143-156</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">143-156</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Salma Marija |
spellingShingle |
Salma Marija misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K Judgment by failure to appear |
authorStr |
Salma Marija |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)627314120 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
24061255 |
topic_title |
Judgment by failure to appear judgment by failure to appear default judgment |
topic |
misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K |
topic_unstemmed |
misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K |
topic_browse |
misc judgment by failure to appear misc default judgment misc Law misc K |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
hierarchy_parent_id |
627314120 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)627314120 (DE-600)2557007-9 |
title |
Judgment by failure to appear |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ004673549 (DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db |
title_full |
Judgment by failure to appear |
author_sort |
Salma Marija |
journal |
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
journalStr |
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
lang_code |
eng srp |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2012 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
143 |
author_browse |
Salma Marija |
container_volume |
46 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Salma Marija |
doi_str_mv |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 |
title_sort |
judgment by failure to appear |
title_auth |
Judgment by failure to appear |
abstract |
The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. |
abstractGer |
The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Judgment by failure to appear |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179 https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
627314120 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.5937/zrpfns46-2572 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:41:03.293Z |
_version_ |
1803606990043217920 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ004673549</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309184300.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ004673549</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salma Marija</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper addresses the judgment by failure to appear, which was reintroduced by the new Law on Civil Procedure in 2011. An evolution of this type of judgment is shown, in particular the fact that the 2004 law abolished the judgment by failure to appear in general civil procedure, whereas the default judgment was introduced. In our new Law on Civil Action (ZPP), both institutes are kept. A common result - effect of these judgments is dealt with. Both failure of the defendant/respondent to appear and to file a pleading has as a consequence entering a judgment by which the claim of plaintiff is sustained. The paper analyses comparative legal solutions as well as the (evolution of) domestic theory and practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judgment by failure to appear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">default judgment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2012), 2, Seite 143-156</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)627314120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2557007-9</subfield><subfield code="x">24061255</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:143-156</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2572</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e251c5433ae84d47be18a339dc2bc5db</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2012/0550-21791202143S.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0550-2179</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1255</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">143-156</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400585 |