Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms

Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Giancarlo Ottaviano [verfasserIn] Alfonso Luca Pendolino [verfasserIn] Bruno Scarpa [verfasserIn] Miriam Torsello [verfasserIn] Daniele Sartori [verfasserIn] Enrico Savietto [verfasserIn] Elena Cantone [verfasserIn] Piero Nicolai [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Personalized Medicine - MDPI AG, 2012, 12(2022), 9, p 1513
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:12 ; year:2022 ; number:9, p 1513

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/jpm12091513

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ005631610

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ005631610
003	DE-627
005	20240414202535.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/jpm12091513 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ005631610
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Giancarlo Ottaviano \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores.
650		4	\|a PNIF
650		4	\|a 4-phase rhinomanometry
650		4	\|a acoustic rhinometry
650		4	\|a VAS
650		4	\|a SNOT-22
650		4	\|a nasal obstruction
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
700	0		\|a Alfonso Luca Pendolino \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Bruno Scarpa \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Miriam Torsello \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Daniele Sartori \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Enrico Savietto \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Elena Cantone \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Piero Nicolai \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Personalized Medicine \|d MDPI AG, 2012 \|g 12(2022), 9, p 1513 \|w (DE-627)71862713X \|w (DE-600)2662248-8 \|x 20754426 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:12 \|g year:2022 \|g number:9, p 1513
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 12 \|j 2022 \|e 9, p 1513

Indexfelder

author_variant	g o go a l p alp b s bs m t mt d s ds e s es e c ec p n pn
matchkey_str	article:20754426:2022----::orltosewepanslnprtrfoaosirioer4hsrioaoe
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.3390/jpm12091513 doi (DE-627)DOAJ005631610 (DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Giancarlo Ottaviano verfasserin aut Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores. PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction Medicine R Alfonso Luca Pendolino verfasserin aut Bruno Scarpa verfasserin aut Miriam Torsello verfasserin aut Daniele Sartori verfasserin aut Enrico Savietto verfasserin aut Elena Cantone verfasserin aut Piero Nicolai verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 9, p 1513 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:9, p 1513 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 9, p 1513
spelling	10.3390/jpm12091513 doi (DE-627)DOAJ005631610 (DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Giancarlo Ottaviano verfasserin aut Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores. PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction Medicine R Alfonso Luca Pendolino verfasserin aut Bruno Scarpa verfasserin aut Miriam Torsello verfasserin aut Daniele Sartori verfasserin aut Enrico Savietto verfasserin aut Elena Cantone verfasserin aut Piero Nicolai verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 9, p 1513 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:9, p 1513 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 9, p 1513
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/jpm12091513 doi (DE-627)DOAJ005631610 (DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Giancarlo Ottaviano verfasserin aut Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores. PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction Medicine R Alfonso Luca Pendolino verfasserin aut Bruno Scarpa verfasserin aut Miriam Torsello verfasserin aut Daniele Sartori verfasserin aut Enrico Savietto verfasserin aut Elena Cantone verfasserin aut Piero Nicolai verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 9, p 1513 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:9, p 1513 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 9, p 1513
allfieldsGer	10.3390/jpm12091513 doi (DE-627)DOAJ005631610 (DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Giancarlo Ottaviano verfasserin aut Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores. PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction Medicine R Alfonso Luca Pendolino verfasserin aut Bruno Scarpa verfasserin aut Miriam Torsello verfasserin aut Daniele Sartori verfasserin aut Enrico Savietto verfasserin aut Elena Cantone verfasserin aut Piero Nicolai verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 9, p 1513 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:9, p 1513 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 9, p 1513
allfieldsSound	10.3390/jpm12091513 doi (DE-627)DOAJ005631610 (DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Giancarlo Ottaviano verfasserin aut Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores. PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction Medicine R Alfonso Luca Pendolino verfasserin aut Bruno Scarpa verfasserin aut Miriam Torsello verfasserin aut Daniele Sartori verfasserin aut Enrico Savietto verfasserin aut Elena Cantone verfasserin aut Piero Nicolai verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 9, p 1513 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:9, p 1513 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 9, p 1513
language	English
source	In Journal of Personalized Medicine 12(2022), 9, p 1513 volume:12 year:2022 number:9, p 1513
sourceStr	In Journal of Personalized Medicine 12(2022), 9, p 1513 volume:12 year:2022 number:9, p 1513
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction Medicine R
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Personalized Medicine
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Giancarlo Ottaviano @@aut@@ Alfonso Luca Pendolino @@aut@@ Bruno Scarpa @@aut@@ Miriam Torsello @@aut@@ Daniele Sartori @@aut@@ Enrico Savietto @@aut@@ Elena Cantone @@aut@@ Piero Nicolai @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	71862713X
id	DOAJ005631610
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ005631610</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414202535.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jpm12091513</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ005631610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giancarlo Ottaviano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PNIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">4-phase rhinomanometry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acoustic rhinometry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">VAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SNOT-22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nasal obstruction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alfonso Luca Pendolino</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bruno Scarpa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miriam Torsello</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Sartori</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enrico Savietto</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elena Cantone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piero Nicolai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Personalized Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2022), 9, p 1513</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)71862713X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2662248-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20754426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9, p 1513</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">9, p 1513</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Giancarlo Ottaviano
spellingShingle	Giancarlo Ottaviano misc PNIF misc 4-phase rhinomanometry misc acoustic rhinometry misc VAS misc SNOT-22 misc nasal obstruction misc Medicine misc R Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms
authorStr	Giancarlo Ottaviano
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)71862713X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20754426
topic_title	Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms PNIF 4-phase rhinomanometry acoustic rhinometry VAS SNOT-22 nasal obstruction
topic	misc PNIF misc 4-phase rhinomanometry misc acoustic rhinometry misc VAS misc SNOT-22 misc nasal obstruction misc Medicine misc R
topic_unstemmed	misc PNIF misc 4-phase rhinomanometry misc acoustic rhinometry misc VAS misc SNOT-22 misc nasal obstruction misc Medicine misc R
topic_browse	misc PNIF misc 4-phase rhinomanometry misc acoustic rhinometry misc VAS misc SNOT-22 misc nasal obstruction misc Medicine misc R
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Personalized Medicine
hierarchy_parent_id	71862713X
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Personalized Medicine
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8
title	Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ005631610 (DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae
title_full	Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms
author_sort	Giancarlo Ottaviano
journal	Journal of Personalized Medicine
journalStr	Journal of Personalized Medicine
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Giancarlo Ottaviano Alfonso Luca Pendolino Bruno Scarpa Miriam Torsello Daniele Sartori Enrico Savietto Elena Cantone Piero Nicolai
container_volume	12
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Giancarlo Ottaviano
doi_str_mv	10.3390/jpm12091513
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	correlations between peak nasal inspiratory flow, acoustic rhinometry, 4-phase rhinomanometry and reported nasal symptoms
title_auth	Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms
abstract	Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores.
abstractGer	Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores.
abstract_unstemmed	Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	9, p 1513
title_short	Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513 https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513 https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426
remote_bool	true
author2	Alfonso Luca Pendolino Bruno Scarpa Miriam Torsello Daniele Sartori Enrico Savietto Elena Cantone Piero Nicolai
author2Str	Alfonso Luca Pendolino Bruno Scarpa Miriam Torsello Daniele Sartori Enrico Savietto Elena Cantone Piero Nicolai
ppnlink	71862713X
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/jpm12091513
up_date	2024-07-03T16:11:18.384Z
_version_	1803574919442726912
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ005631610</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414202535.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jpm12091513</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ005631610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giancarlo Ottaviano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are popular methods for nasal patency evaluation. The aim of the present study was to compare these three methods with the reported nasal symptoms to determine the best diagnostic tool to assess nasal obstruction. Methods: 101 subjects were evaluated using PNIF, 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR), AR, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal obstruction (VAS-NO) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Correlations among PNIF, 4PR, AR, VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were obtained. Results: VAS-NO and SNOT-22 were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.54, <i<p</i< < 0.001). 4PR was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0016) and AR (r = –0.5, <i<p</i< < 0.001). VAS-NO was mildly correlated with PNIF (r = –0.29, <i<p</i< = 0.0034). SNOT-22 was moderately correlated with PNIF (r = –0.31, <i<p</i< = 0.0017). After dividing the population into symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, based on their VAS-NO score, the former showed significantly lower PNIF values (<i<p</i< = 0.009) and higher 4PR values (<i<p</i< = 0.013) compared to the latter ones. Conclusion: PNIF and 4PR showed a significant moderate correlation with each other, but PNIF showed a significant correlation (weak-moderate) with the reported nasal symptom scores.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PNIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">4-phase rhinomanometry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acoustic rhinometry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">VAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SNOT-22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nasal obstruction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alfonso Luca Pendolino</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bruno Scarpa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miriam Torsello</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Sartori</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enrico Savietto</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elena Cantone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piero Nicolai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Personalized Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2022), 9, p 1513</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)71862713X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2662248-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20754426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9, p 1513</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091513</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b170b272b2a34511bc23cffd48d612ae</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/9/1513</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">9, p 1513</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4018087

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Correlations between Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, Acoustic Rhinometry, 4-Phase Rhinomanometry and Reported Nasal Symptoms

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?