Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds
The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were p...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Melina Vilela dos Santos [verfasserIn] Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz [verfasserIn] Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Portugiesisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014, 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:72 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; pages:01-10 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ00672521X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ00672521X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307023941.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ00672521X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a por | ||
050 | 0 | |a SF250.5-275 | |
100 | 0 | |a Melina Vilela dos Santos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Salvia hispanica | |
650 | 4 | |a análises microbiológicas | |
650 | 4 | |a análises físico-químicas | |
650 | 4 | |a aceitação sensorial | |
653 | 0 | |a Dairy processing. Dairy products | |
700 | 0 | |a Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes |d Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014 |g 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 |w (DE-627)790171228 |w (DE-600)2777338-3 |x 22386416 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:72 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:01-10 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 72 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 01-10 |
author_variant |
m v d s mvds r g d c rgdc m e f a mefa |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:22386416:2017----::eeomnadesreautooygr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
callnumber-subject-code |
SF |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00672521X (DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng por SF250.5-275 Melina Vilela dos Santos verfasserin aut Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. Salvia hispanica análises microbiológicas análises físico-químicas aceitação sensorial Dairy processing. Dairy products Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz verfasserin aut Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida verfasserin aut In Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 (DE-627)790171228 (DE-600)2777338-3 22386416 nnns volume:72 year:2017 number:1 pages:01-10 https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 kostenfrei https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 72 2017 1 01-10 |
spelling |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00672521X (DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng por SF250.5-275 Melina Vilela dos Santos verfasserin aut Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. Salvia hispanica análises microbiológicas análises físico-químicas aceitação sensorial Dairy processing. Dairy products Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz verfasserin aut Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida verfasserin aut In Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 (DE-627)790171228 (DE-600)2777338-3 22386416 nnns volume:72 year:2017 number:1 pages:01-10 https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 kostenfrei https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 72 2017 1 01-10 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00672521X (DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng por SF250.5-275 Melina Vilela dos Santos verfasserin aut Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. Salvia hispanica análises microbiológicas análises físico-químicas aceitação sensorial Dairy processing. Dairy products Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz verfasserin aut Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida verfasserin aut In Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 (DE-627)790171228 (DE-600)2777338-3 22386416 nnns volume:72 year:2017 number:1 pages:01-10 https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 kostenfrei https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 72 2017 1 01-10 |
allfieldsGer |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00672521X (DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng por SF250.5-275 Melina Vilela dos Santos verfasserin aut Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. Salvia hispanica análises microbiológicas análises físico-químicas aceitação sensorial Dairy processing. Dairy products Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz verfasserin aut Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida verfasserin aut In Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 (DE-627)790171228 (DE-600)2777338-3 22386416 nnns volume:72 year:2017 number:1 pages:01-10 https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 kostenfrei https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 72 2017 1 01-10 |
allfieldsSound |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 doi (DE-627)DOAJ00672521X (DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng por SF250.5-275 Melina Vilela dos Santos verfasserin aut Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. Salvia hispanica análises microbiológicas análises físico-químicas aceitação sensorial Dairy processing. Dairy products Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz verfasserin aut Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida verfasserin aut In Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 (DE-627)790171228 (DE-600)2777338-3 22386416 nnns volume:72 year:2017 number:1 pages:01-10 https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 kostenfrei https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 72 2017 1 01-10 |
language |
English Portuguese |
source |
In Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 volume:72 year:2017 number:1 pages:01-10 |
sourceStr |
In Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes 72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10 volume:72 year:2017 number:1 pages:01-10 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Salvia hispanica análises microbiológicas análises físico-químicas aceitação sensorial Dairy processing. Dairy products |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Melina Vilela dos Santos @@aut@@ Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz @@aut@@ Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
790171228 |
id |
DOAJ00672521X |
language_de |
englisch portugiesisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ00672521X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307023941.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ00672521X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF250.5-275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melina Vilela dos Santos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salvia hispanica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">análises microbiológicas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">análises físico-químicas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aceitação sensorial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dairy processing. Dairy products</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes</subfield><subfield code="d">Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)790171228</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2777338-3</subfield><subfield code="x">22386416</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:72</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:01-10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">72</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">01-10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
author |
Melina Vilela dos Santos |
spellingShingle |
Melina Vilela dos Santos misc SF250.5-275 misc Salvia hispanica misc análises microbiológicas misc análises físico-químicas misc aceitação sensorial misc Dairy processing. Dairy products Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds |
authorStr |
Melina Vilela dos Santos |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)790171228 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
SF250 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
22386416 |
topic_title |
SF250.5-275 Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds Salvia hispanica análises microbiológicas análises físico-químicas aceitação sensorial |
topic |
misc SF250.5-275 misc Salvia hispanica misc análises microbiológicas misc análises físico-químicas misc aceitação sensorial misc Dairy processing. Dairy products |
topic_unstemmed |
misc SF250.5-275 misc Salvia hispanica misc análises microbiológicas misc análises físico-químicas misc aceitação sensorial misc Dairy processing. Dairy products |
topic_browse |
misc SF250.5-275 misc Salvia hispanica misc análises microbiológicas misc análises físico-químicas misc aceitação sensorial misc Dairy processing. Dairy products |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes |
hierarchy_parent_id |
790171228 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)790171228 (DE-600)2777338-3 |
title |
Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ00672521X (DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 |
title_full |
Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds |
author_sort |
Melina Vilela dos Santos |
journal |
Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes |
journalStr |
Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes |
callnumber-first-code |
S |
lang_code |
eng por |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
01 |
author_browse |
Melina Vilela dos Santos Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida |
container_volume |
72 |
class |
SF250.5-275 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Melina Vilela dos Santos |
doi_str_mv |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds |
callnumber |
SF250.5-275 |
title_auth |
Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds |
abstract |
The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. |
abstractGer |
The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds |
url |
https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752 https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535 https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674 https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida |
author2Str |
Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida |
ppnlink |
790171228 |
callnumber-subject |
SF - Animal Culture |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535 |
callnumber-a |
SF250.5-275 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:35:06.825Z |
_version_ |
1803599066511179776 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ00672521X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307023941.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ00672521X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF250.5-275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melina Vilela dos Santos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Development and sensory evaluation of yogurt with chia seeds</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptance of yogurt formulations with chia seeds. After preparation of the formulations (A - Control, B - yogurt added of 2% of chia seeds, C - yoghurt added of 3% of chia seeds), microbiological and physicochemical analyzes were performed. Hedonic scales were used to verify the acceptance and the intention to purchase the elaborated formulations, as well as the Acceptability Index. The data of the acceptance and purchase intention tests were evaluated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and later, Tukey’s Test was applied at a 5% probability. Yogurt formulations were within the standards required by Brazilian Legislation for microbiological and physicochemical analyzes. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) between the 3 yoghurt formulations for the attributes of flavor, texture and overall impression. However, regarding the appearance attribute, the formulation with 3% chia (C) seeds was less appreciated (p < 0,05) than the control formulation (A). The formulations with chia seeds (B and C) had a good sensory acceptance by the evaluators, and the flavor attribute was the most prominent. Among formulations with chia seeds, formulation B presented the best Acceptability Index. There was no significant difference (p < 0,05) regarding the average of the purchase intention notes for the 3 yogurt formulations. It was concluded that the yogurt formulations with chia seeds were adequate for the microbiological and physicochemical parameters during the storage period, besides obtaining a good sensorial acceptance, presenting itself as a healthier milk alternative for the consumers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salvia hispanica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">análises microbiológicas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">análises físico-químicas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aceitação sensorial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dairy processing. Dairy products</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richtier Gonçalves da Cruz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martha Elisa Ferreira Almeida</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista do Instituto de Latícinios Cândido Tostes</subfield><subfield code="d">Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">72(2017), 1, Seite 01-10</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)790171228</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2777338-3</subfield><subfield code="x">22386416</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:72</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:01-10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14295/2238-6416.v72i1.535</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/14b4e07345d948199893456b4d5ef752</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/535</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0100-3674</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2238-6416</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">72</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">01-10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4001513 |