Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots

This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the pe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Audrey Moutat [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Französisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017, 13(2019)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:13 ; year:2019

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.4000/lexis.3026

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ006852637

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ006852637
003	DE-627
005	20230503014101.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.4000/lexis.3026 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ006852637
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a fre
050		0	\|a P327-327.5
100	0		\|a Audrey Moutat \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	3	\|a Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses.
650		4	\|a interpretive semantics
650		4	\|a wine tasting
650		4	\|a sensory communication
650		4	\|a wine lexicon
650		4	\|a semiotics
650		4	\|a iconicity
653		0	\|a Lexicography
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology \|d Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017 \|g 13(2019) \|w (DE-627)660808293 \|w (DE-600)2609460-5 \|x 19516215 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:13 \|g year:2019
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 13 \|j 2019

Indexfelder

author_variant	a m am
matchkey_str	article:19516215:2019----::eomnarnlgqeuomndutr
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
callnumber-subject-code	P
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.4000/lexis.3026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ006852637 (DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre P327-327.5 Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses. interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity Lexicography In Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017 13(2019) (DE-627)660808293 (DE-600)2609460-5 19516215 nnns volume:13 year:2019 https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019
spelling	10.4000/lexis.3026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ006852637 (DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre P327-327.5 Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses. interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity Lexicography In Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017 13(2019) (DE-627)660808293 (DE-600)2609460-5 19516215 nnns volume:13 year:2019 https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019
allfields_unstemmed	10.4000/lexis.3026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ006852637 (DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre P327-327.5 Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses. interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity Lexicography In Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017 13(2019) (DE-627)660808293 (DE-600)2609460-5 19516215 nnns volume:13 year:2019 https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019
allfieldsGer	10.4000/lexis.3026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ006852637 (DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre P327-327.5 Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses. interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity Lexicography In Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017 13(2019) (DE-627)660808293 (DE-600)2609460-5 19516215 nnns volume:13 year:2019 https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019
allfieldsSound	10.4000/lexis.3026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ006852637 (DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre P327-327.5 Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses. interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity Lexicography In Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017 13(2019) (DE-627)660808293 (DE-600)2609460-5 19516215 nnns volume:13 year:2019 https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019
language	English French
source	In Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology 13(2019) volume:13 year:2019
sourceStr	In Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology 13(2019) volume:13 year:2019
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity Lexicography
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Audrey Moutat @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	660808293
id	DOAJ006852637
language_de	englisch franzoesisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ006852637</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503014101.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/lexis.3026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ006852637</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P327-327.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Audrey Moutat</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interpretive semantics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wine tasting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sensory communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wine lexicon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">semiotics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">iconicity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lexicography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology</subfield><subfield code="d">Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2019)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)660808293</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2609460-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19516215</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	P - Language and Literature
author	Audrey Moutat
spellingShingle	Audrey Moutat misc P327-327.5 misc interpretive semantics misc wine tasting misc sensory communication misc wine lexicon misc semiotics misc iconicity misc Lexicography Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots
authorStr	Audrey Moutat
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)660808293
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	P327-327
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	19516215
topic_title	P327-327.5 Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots interpretive semantics wine tasting sensory communication wine lexicon semiotics iconicity
topic	misc P327-327.5 misc interpretive semantics misc wine tasting misc sensory communication misc wine lexicon misc semiotics misc iconicity misc Lexicography
topic_unstemmed	misc P327-327.5 misc interpretive semantics misc wine tasting misc sensory communication misc wine lexicon misc semiotics misc iconicity misc Lexicography
topic_browse	misc P327-327.5 misc interpretive semantics misc wine tasting misc sensory communication misc wine lexicon misc semiotics misc iconicity misc Lexicography
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
hierarchy_parent_id	660808293
hierarchy_top_title	Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)660808293 (DE-600)2609460-5
title	Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ006852637 (DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a
title_full	Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots
author_sort	Audrey Moutat
journal	Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
journalStr	Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
callnumber-first-code	P
lang_code	eng fre
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Audrey Moutat
container_volume	13
class	P327-327.5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Audrey Moutat
doi_str_mv	10.4000/lexis.3026
title_sort	commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots
callnumber	P327-327.5
title_auth	Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots
abstract	This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses.
abstractGer	This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses.
abstract_unstemmed	This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots
url	https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026 https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026 https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	660808293
callnumber-subject	P - Philology and Linguistics
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.4000/lexis.3026
callnumber-a	P327-327.5
up_date	2024-07-03T23:13:31.322Z
_version_	1803601482950377472
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ006852637</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503014101.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/lexis.3026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ006852637</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P327-327.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Audrey Moutat</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper is part of a wider study on the discourse on perception I have conducted in the past few years. I had two goals: (i) on the one hand, I tried to determine how people use the French language in order to talk about their perceptions; (ii) on the other hand, I wanted to understand how the perceived phenomena thus described are organized into morphological forms and become significant. To carry out this study, I decided to work on wine tasting to identify, describe and evaluate how the organoleptic qualities of a wine are perceived. I built a corpus comprising tasting notes published in five French “oenological” magazines sold in newsstands. I aimed to identify communication devices used by professional tasters to describe the complexity of the wines tasted. I particularly focused on the lexicon of taste and thus evaluated the relevance of this terminology by studying the interpretive pathways it induces. Both the interpretive semantics developed by François Rastier and Jean-François Bordron’s theory of iconicity allowed me to find the common organization between perception (the organoleptic qualities of a wine) and language (the semantic properties of the wine terminology). Indeed, I noticed that this wine terminology, sometimes considered “metaphorical”, is similar to the terminology relating to perceptions deriving from different senses.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interpretive semantics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wine tasting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sensory communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wine lexicon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">semiotics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">iconicity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lexicography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology</subfield><subfield code="d">Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2019)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)660808293</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2609460-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19516215</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/79f1aae60f5e491b9f377f1e031b364a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1951-6215</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3999386

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Le commentaire œnologique ou comment déguster le vin par les mots

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?