Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After
The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Roy Menarini [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Italienisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: ZoneModa Journal - University of Bologna, 2018, 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:10 ; year:2020 ; number:1S ; pages:159-165 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ007289030 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ007289030 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502091243.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ007289030 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a ita | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a N1-9211 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Roy Menarini |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cinephilia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a film criticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a film aesthetics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a film theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a film consumption | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Fine Arts | |
| 653 | 0 | |a N | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Visual arts | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t ZoneModa Journal |d University of Bologna, 2018 |g 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 |w (DE-627)1684071747 |w (DE-600)3002010-4 |x 26110563 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2020 |g number:1S |g pages:159-165 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2020 |e 1S |h 159-165 | ||
| author_variant |
r m rm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:26110563:2020----::iehlanteeteiiainfimutrlei |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
N |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007289030 (DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita N1-9211 Roy Menarini verfasserin aut Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? cinephilia film criticism film aesthetics film theory film consumption Fine Arts N Visual arts In ZoneModa Journal University of Bologna, 2018 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 (DE-627)1684071747 (DE-600)3002010-4 26110563 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1S pages:159-165 https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb kostenfrei https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1S 159-165 |
| spelling |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007289030 (DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita N1-9211 Roy Menarini verfasserin aut Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? cinephilia film criticism film aesthetics film theory film consumption Fine Arts N Visual arts In ZoneModa Journal University of Bologna, 2018 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 (DE-627)1684071747 (DE-600)3002010-4 26110563 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1S pages:159-165 https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb kostenfrei https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1S 159-165 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007289030 (DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita N1-9211 Roy Menarini verfasserin aut Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? cinephilia film criticism film aesthetics film theory film consumption Fine Arts N Visual arts In ZoneModa Journal University of Bologna, 2018 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 (DE-627)1684071747 (DE-600)3002010-4 26110563 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1S pages:159-165 https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb kostenfrei https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1S 159-165 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007289030 (DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita N1-9211 Roy Menarini verfasserin aut Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? cinephilia film criticism film aesthetics film theory film consumption Fine Arts N Visual arts In ZoneModa Journal University of Bologna, 2018 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 (DE-627)1684071747 (DE-600)3002010-4 26110563 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1S pages:159-165 https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb kostenfrei https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1S 159-165 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007289030 (DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita N1-9211 Roy Menarini verfasserin aut Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? cinephilia film criticism film aesthetics film theory film consumption Fine Arts N Visual arts In ZoneModa Journal University of Bologna, 2018 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 (DE-627)1684071747 (DE-600)3002010-4 26110563 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1S pages:159-165 https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb kostenfrei https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1S 159-165 |
| language |
English Italian |
| source |
In ZoneModa Journal 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 volume:10 year:2020 number:1S pages:159-165 |
| sourceStr |
In ZoneModa Journal 10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165 volume:10 year:2020 number:1S pages:159-165 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
cinephilia film criticism film aesthetics film theory film consumption Fine Arts N Visual arts |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
ZoneModa Journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Roy Menarini @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1684071747 |
| id |
DOAJ007289030 |
| language_de |
englisch italienisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007289030</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502091243.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007289030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">N1-9211</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roy Menarini</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cinephilia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film aesthetics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film consumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fine Arts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">N</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Visual arts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">ZoneModa Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Bologna, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1684071747</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3002010-4</subfield><subfield code="x">26110563</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1S</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:159-165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1S</subfield><subfield code="h">159-165</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
N - Fine Arts |
| author |
Roy Menarini |
| spellingShingle |
Roy Menarini misc N1-9211 misc cinephilia misc film criticism misc film aesthetics misc film theory misc film consumption misc Fine Arts misc N misc Visual arts Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After |
| authorStr |
Roy Menarini |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1684071747 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
N1-9211 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
26110563 |
| topic_title |
N1-9211 Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After cinephilia film criticism film aesthetics film theory film consumption |
| topic |
misc N1-9211 misc cinephilia misc film criticism misc film aesthetics misc film theory misc film consumption misc Fine Arts misc N misc Visual arts |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc N1-9211 misc cinephilia misc film criticism misc film aesthetics misc film theory misc film consumption misc Fine Arts misc N misc Visual arts |
| topic_browse |
misc N1-9211 misc cinephilia misc film criticism misc film aesthetics misc film theory misc film consumption misc Fine Arts misc N misc Visual arts |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
ZoneModa Journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1684071747 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
ZoneModa Journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1684071747 (DE-600)3002010-4 |
| title |
Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ007289030 (DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb |
| title_full |
Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After |
| author_sort |
Roy Menarini |
| journal |
ZoneModa Journal |
| journalStr |
ZoneModa Journal |
| callnumber-first-code |
N |
| lang_code |
eng ita |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
159 |
| author_browse |
Roy Menarini |
| container_volume |
10 |
| class |
N1-9211 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Roy Menarini |
| doi_str_mv |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 |
| title_sort |
cinephilia and the aestheticization of film. cultural legitimacy before and after |
| callnumber |
N1-9211 |
| title_auth |
Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After |
| abstract |
The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? |
| abstractGer |
The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema? |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
1S |
| title_short |
Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563 https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1684071747 |
| callnumber-subject |
N - Visual Arts |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563 |
| callnumber-a |
N1-9211 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:00:15.280Z |
| _version_ |
1803608197988089856 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007289030</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502091243.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007289030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">N1-9211</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roy Menarini</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cinephilia and the Aestheticization of Film. Cultural Legitimacy Before and After</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The history of cinema is characterized by the fight for cultural legitimacy. Specifically, in the 20th century, cinema played a key role for the expansion of the aesthetic field in debates on contemporary times and even influenced the philosophy of art. Aesthetic categories are taken from other and more traditional artistic forms (such as representative arts, literature and theatre). The purpose is to expand the field of cultural legitimacy of cinema also to those fields which were considered too involved in the industrial needs. This is the reason why contemporary cinephilia have sometimes extended the broad definition of “beautiful” also to more marginal areas as well as to the most unpredictable places (from pornography to horror), thus identifying forms of art everywhere. So, what is cinephilia and how did it revolutionize the aesthetic criteria of cinema?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cinephilia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film aesthetics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">film consumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fine Arts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">N</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Visual arts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">ZoneModa Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Bologna, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 1S, Seite 159-165</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1684071747</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3002010-4</subfield><subfield code="x">26110563</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1S</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:159-165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/10563</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/46d2750fbec54921bc22398fd2874ffb</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/10563</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2611-0563</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1S</subfield><subfield code="h">159-165</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3997526 |