Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments

Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ting Zhang [verfasserIn] Ting Wei [verfasserIn] Yawen Zhao [verfasserIn] Mengyang Jiang [verfasserIn] Xiaojie Yin [verfasserIn] Huiqiang Sun [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Dental Sciences - Elsevier, 2017, 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:17 ; year:2022 ; number:1 ; pages:204-210

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ007394012

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ007394012
003	DE-627
005	20230309223811.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ007394012
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RK1-715
100	0		\|a Ting Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance.
650		4	\|a Computer-aided design
650		4	\|a Data accuracy
650		4	\|a Dental impression technique
650		4	\|a Dental models
650		4	\|a Prosthodontics
653		0	\|a Dentistry
700	0		\|a Ting Wei \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yawen Zhao \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Mengyang Jiang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xiaojie Yin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Huiqiang Sun \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Dental Sciences \|d Elsevier, 2017 \|g 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 \|w (DE-627)604074778 \|w (DE-600)2502332-9 \|x 19917902 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:17 \|g year:2022 \|g number:1 \|g pages:204-210
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 17 \|j 2022 \|e 1 \|h 204-210

Indexfelder

author_variant	t z tz t w tw y z yz m j mj x y xy h s hs
matchkey_str	article:19917902:2022----::vlaighacrcotrenroasanruigoesotiigifrnnm
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	RK
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007394012 (DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Ting Zhang verfasserin aut Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance. Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics Dentistry Ting Wei verfasserin aut Yawen Zhao verfasserin aut Mengyang Jiang verfasserin aut Xiaojie Yin verfasserin aut Huiqiang Sun verfasserin aut In Journal of Dental Sciences Elsevier, 2017 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 (DE-627)604074778 (DE-600)2502332-9 19917902 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:204-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 1 204-210
spelling	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007394012 (DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Ting Zhang verfasserin aut Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance. Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics Dentistry Ting Wei verfasserin aut Yawen Zhao verfasserin aut Mengyang Jiang verfasserin aut Xiaojie Yin verfasserin aut Huiqiang Sun verfasserin aut In Journal of Dental Sciences Elsevier, 2017 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 (DE-627)604074778 (DE-600)2502332-9 19917902 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:204-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 1 204-210
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007394012 (DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Ting Zhang verfasserin aut Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance. Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics Dentistry Ting Wei verfasserin aut Yawen Zhao verfasserin aut Mengyang Jiang verfasserin aut Xiaojie Yin verfasserin aut Huiqiang Sun verfasserin aut In Journal of Dental Sciences Elsevier, 2017 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 (DE-627)604074778 (DE-600)2502332-9 19917902 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:204-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 1 204-210
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007394012 (DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Ting Zhang verfasserin aut Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance. Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics Dentistry Ting Wei verfasserin aut Yawen Zhao verfasserin aut Mengyang Jiang verfasserin aut Xiaojie Yin verfasserin aut Huiqiang Sun verfasserin aut In Journal of Dental Sciences Elsevier, 2017 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 (DE-627)604074778 (DE-600)2502332-9 19917902 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:204-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 1 204-210
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007394012 (DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Ting Zhang verfasserin aut Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance. Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics Dentistry Ting Wei verfasserin aut Yawen Zhao verfasserin aut Mengyang Jiang verfasserin aut Xiaojie Yin verfasserin aut Huiqiang Sun verfasserin aut In Journal of Dental Sciences Elsevier, 2017 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 (DE-627)604074778 (DE-600)2502332-9 19917902 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:204-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 1 204-210
language	English
source	In Journal of Dental Sciences 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:204-210
sourceStr	In Journal of Dental Sciences 17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210 volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:204-210
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics Dentistry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Dental Sciences
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ting Zhang @@aut@@ Ting Wei @@aut@@ Yawen Zhao @@aut@@ Mengyang Jiang @@aut@@ Xiaojie Yin @@aut@@ Huiqiang Sun @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	604074778
id	DOAJ007394012
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007394012</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309223811.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007394012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ting Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computer-aided design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Data accuracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental impression technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prosthodontics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ting Wei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yawen Zhao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mengyang Jiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaojie Yin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huiqiang Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Dental Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)604074778</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2502332-9</subfield><subfield code="x">19917902</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:204-210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">204-210</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Ting Zhang
spellingShingle	Ting Zhang misc RK1-715 misc Computer-aided design misc Data accuracy misc Dental impression technique misc Dental models misc Prosthodontics misc Dentistry Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
authorStr	Ting Zhang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)604074778
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RK1-715
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	19917902
topic_title	RK1-715 Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments Computer-aided design Data accuracy Dental impression technique Dental models Prosthodontics
topic	misc RK1-715 misc Computer-aided design misc Data accuracy misc Dental impression technique misc Dental models misc Prosthodontics misc Dentistry
topic_unstemmed	misc RK1-715 misc Computer-aided design misc Data accuracy misc Dental impression technique misc Dental models misc Prosthodontics misc Dentistry
topic_browse	misc RK1-715 misc Computer-aided design misc Data accuracy misc Dental impression technique misc Dental models misc Prosthodontics misc Dentistry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Dental Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	604074778
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Dental Sciences
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)604074778 (DE-600)2502332-9
title	Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ007394012 (DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60
title_full	Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
author_sort	Ting Zhang
journal	Journal of Dental Sciences
journalStr	Journal of Dental Sciences
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	204
author_browse	Ting Zhang Ting Wei Yawen Zhao Mengyang Jiang Xiaojie Yin Huiqiang Sun
container_volume	17
class	RK1-715
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Ting Zhang
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
callnumber	RK1-715
title_auth	Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
abstract	Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance.
abstractGer	Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance.
abstract_unstemmed	Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787 https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902
remote_bool	true
author2	Ting Wei Yawen Zhao Mengyang Jiang Xiaojie Yin Huiqiang Sun
author2Str	Ting Wei Yawen Zhao Mengyang Jiang Xiaojie Yin Huiqiang Sun
ppnlink	604074778
callnumber-subject	RK - Dentistry
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017
callnumber-a	RK1-715
up_date	2024-07-04T01:24:36.797Z
_version_	1803609730500788224
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007394012</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309223811.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007394012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ting Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background/purpose: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. Materials and methods: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. Results: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. Conclusion: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computer-aided design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Data accuracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental impression technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prosthodontics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ting Wei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yawen Zhao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mengyang Jiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaojie Yin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huiqiang Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Dental Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2022), 1, Seite 204-210</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)604074778</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2502332-9</subfield><subfield code="x">19917902</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:204-210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7bc00d5a14a5423f872553412df63a60</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790221000787</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">204-210</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399912

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?