PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY
Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Französisch |
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Management & Marketing - Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009, (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2010 ; number:2 ; pages:287-294 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ007457413 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ007457413 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309230014.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ007457413 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a fre | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a HF5001-6182 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Cătălin AFRĂSINEI |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quality management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a software quality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quality evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quality audit | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Business | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Management & Marketing |d Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009 |g (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 |w (DE-627)1760628603 |x 18412416 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g pages:287-294 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2010 |e 2 |h 287-294 | ||
| author_variant |
c a ca |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18412416:2010----::atclrteoqaiyvlainns |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
HF |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ007457413 (DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre HF5001-6182 Cătălin AFRĂSINEI verfasserin aut PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. Management quality management software quality quality evaluation quality audit Business In Management & Marketing Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009 (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 (DE-627)1760628603 18412416 nnns year:2010 number:2 pages:287-294 https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 kostenfrei http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2010 2 287-294 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ007457413 (DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre HF5001-6182 Cătălin AFRĂSINEI verfasserin aut PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. Management quality management software quality quality evaluation quality audit Business In Management & Marketing Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009 (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 (DE-627)1760628603 18412416 nnns year:2010 number:2 pages:287-294 https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 kostenfrei http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2010 2 287-294 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ007457413 (DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre HF5001-6182 Cătălin AFRĂSINEI verfasserin aut PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. Management quality management software quality quality evaluation quality audit Business In Management & Marketing Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009 (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 (DE-627)1760628603 18412416 nnns year:2010 number:2 pages:287-294 https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 kostenfrei http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2010 2 287-294 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ007457413 (DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre HF5001-6182 Cătălin AFRĂSINEI verfasserin aut PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. Management quality management software quality quality evaluation quality audit Business In Management & Marketing Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009 (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 (DE-627)1760628603 18412416 nnns year:2010 number:2 pages:287-294 https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 kostenfrei http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2010 2 287-294 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ007457413 (DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre HF5001-6182 Cătălin AFRĂSINEI verfasserin aut PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. Management quality management software quality quality evaluation quality audit Business In Management & Marketing Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009 (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 (DE-627)1760628603 18412416 nnns year:2010 number:2 pages:287-294 https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 kostenfrei http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2010 2 287-294 |
| language |
English French |
| source |
In Management & Marketing (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 year:2010 number:2 pages:287-294 |
| sourceStr |
In Management & Marketing (2010), 2, Seite 287-294 year:2010 number:2 pages:287-294 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Management quality management software quality quality evaluation quality audit Business |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Management & Marketing |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760628603 |
| id |
DOAJ007457413 |
| language_de |
englisch franzoesisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007457413</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309230014.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007457413</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HF5001-6182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cătălin AFRĂSINEI</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Management & Marketing</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2010), 2, Seite 287-294</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760628603</subfield><subfield code="x">18412416</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:287-294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">287-294</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
| author |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI |
| spellingShingle |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI misc HF5001-6182 misc Management misc quality management misc software quality misc quality evaluation misc quality audit misc Business PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY |
| authorStr |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760628603 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
HF5001-6182 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
18412416 |
| topic_title |
HF5001-6182 PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY Management quality management software quality quality evaluation quality audit |
| topic |
misc HF5001-6182 misc Management misc quality management misc software quality misc quality evaluation misc quality audit misc Business |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc HF5001-6182 misc Management misc quality management misc software quality misc quality evaluation misc quality audit misc Business |
| topic_browse |
misc HF5001-6182 misc Management misc quality management misc software quality misc quality evaluation misc quality audit misc Business |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Management & Marketing |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760628603 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Management & Marketing |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760628603 |
| title |
PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ007457413 (DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 |
| title_full |
PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY |
| author_sort |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI |
| journal |
Management & Marketing |
| journalStr |
Management & Marketing |
| callnumber-first-code |
H |
| lang_code |
eng fre |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
287 |
| author_browse |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI |
| class |
HF5001-6182 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Cătălin AFRĂSINEI |
| title_sort |
particularities of quality evaluation in a software company |
| callnumber |
HF5001-6182 |
| title_auth |
PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY |
| abstract |
Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. |
| abstractGer |
Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873 http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760628603 |
| callnumber-subject |
HF - Commerce |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
HF5001-6182 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:38:58.835Z |
| _version_ |
1803610634412097536 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007457413</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309230014.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007457413</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HF5001-6182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cătălin AFRĂSINEI</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PARTICULARITIES OF QUALITY EVALUATION IN A SOFTWARE COMPANY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quality management is a management domain very discussed and disputed nowadays and this is the first sign it is a very modern, needed and present concept in theory and practice. Some are seeing it as a solution to prepare things in the way they are needed, and the instrument which might guarantee a proper environment of keeping them in a specified and constant form. The application of quality management is a quality management system that has to be designed, developed and implemented to achieve the aim of quality. The article has the purpose to briefly present what a quality management system should mean in a software company, why it should be periodically evaluated and how it might be done. In the second part it points out the characteristics of the audit as a general evaluation instrument and the main contribution consists on the author’s endeavor to mark out the particularities of an audit process carried out on a software company, considering the fact that particularization increases the changes to easier and earlier succeed with such an activity on a practical basis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Management & Marketing</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitaria Press Craiova, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2010), 2, Seite 287-294</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760628603</subfield><subfield code="x">18412416</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:287-294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4e03cc7110dd4277ba0381d4126f8873</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2010ed2/11_AfrasineiC_Cluj%20FFF.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1841-2416</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">287-294</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397395 |