Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome

PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Bing Zhang [verfasserIn] Qiao He [verfasserIn] Yali Long [verfasserIn] Yuying Zhang [verfasserIn] Xiaoyan Wang [verfasserIn] Zhifeng Chen [verfasserIn] Jianbo Liu [verfasserIn] Xiangsong Zhang [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Frontiers in Endocrinology - Frontiers Media S.A., 2011, 13(2022)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:13 ; year:2022

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ007780141

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ007780141
003	DE-627
005	20230307024223.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ007780141
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC648-665
100	0		\|a Bing Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.
650		4	\|a Cushing syndrome
650		4	\|a ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
650		4	\|a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
650		4	\|a 68Ga-DOTANOC
650		4	\|a positron-emission tomography/computed tomography
653		0	\|a Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
700	0		\|a Qiao He \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yali Long \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yuying Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xiaoyan Wang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Zhifeng Chen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jianbo Liu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xiangsong Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Frontiers in Endocrinology \|d Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 \|g 13(2022) \|w (DE-627)645090948 \|w (DE-600)2592084-4 \|x 16642392 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:13 \|g year:2022
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 13 \|j 2022

Indexfelder

author_variant	b z bz q h qh y l yl y z yz x w xw z c zc j l jl x z xz
matchkey_str	article:16642392:2022----::oprsnfigotcfiayf8fgecad8aoaopttncoiarnc
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007780141 (DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC648-665 Bing Zhang verfasserin aut Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis. Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology Qiao He verfasserin aut Yali Long verfasserin aut Yuying Zhang verfasserin aut Xiaoyan Wang verfasserin aut Zhifeng Chen verfasserin aut Jianbo Liu verfasserin aut Xiangsong Zhang verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Endocrinology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 13(2022) (DE-627)645090948 (DE-600)2592084-4 16642392 nnns volume:13 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022
spelling	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007780141 (DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC648-665 Bing Zhang verfasserin aut Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis. Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology Qiao He verfasserin aut Yali Long verfasserin aut Yuying Zhang verfasserin aut Xiaoyan Wang verfasserin aut Zhifeng Chen verfasserin aut Jianbo Liu verfasserin aut Xiangsong Zhang verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Endocrinology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 13(2022) (DE-627)645090948 (DE-600)2592084-4 16642392 nnns volume:13 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022
allfields_unstemmed	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007780141 (DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC648-665 Bing Zhang verfasserin aut Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis. Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology Qiao He verfasserin aut Yali Long verfasserin aut Yuying Zhang verfasserin aut Xiaoyan Wang verfasserin aut Zhifeng Chen verfasserin aut Jianbo Liu verfasserin aut Xiangsong Zhang verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Endocrinology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 13(2022) (DE-627)645090948 (DE-600)2592084-4 16642392 nnns volume:13 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022
allfieldsGer	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007780141 (DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC648-665 Bing Zhang verfasserin aut Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis. Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology Qiao He verfasserin aut Yali Long verfasserin aut Yuying Zhang verfasserin aut Xiaoyan Wang verfasserin aut Zhifeng Chen verfasserin aut Jianbo Liu verfasserin aut Xiangsong Zhang verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Endocrinology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 13(2022) (DE-627)645090948 (DE-600)2592084-4 16642392 nnns volume:13 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022
allfieldsSound	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 doi (DE-627)DOAJ007780141 (DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC648-665 Bing Zhang verfasserin aut Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis. Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology Qiao He verfasserin aut Yali Long verfasserin aut Yuying Zhang verfasserin aut Xiaoyan Wang verfasserin aut Zhifeng Chen verfasserin aut Jianbo Liu verfasserin aut Xiangsong Zhang verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Endocrinology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 13(2022) (DE-627)645090948 (DE-600)2592084-4 16642392 nnns volume:13 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022
language	English
source	In Frontiers in Endocrinology 13(2022) volume:13 year:2022
sourceStr	In Frontiers in Endocrinology 13(2022) volume:13 year:2022
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Frontiers in Endocrinology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Bing Zhang @@aut@@ Qiao He @@aut@@ Yali Long @@aut@@ Yuying Zhang @@aut@@ Xiaoyan Wang @@aut@@ Zhifeng Chen @@aut@@ Jianbo Liu @@aut@@ Xiangsong Zhang @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	645090948
id	DOAJ007780141
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007780141</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307024223.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fendo.2022.962800</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007780141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC648-665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bing Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p &lt; 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p &lt; 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p &gt;0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p &lt; 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p &gt; 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p &gt; 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p &lt; 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p &gt; 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cushing syndrome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">18F-fluorodeoxyglucose</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">68Ga-DOTANOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positron-emission tomography/computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qiao He</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yali Long</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoyan Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhifeng Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jianbo Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiangsong Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Endocrinology</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)645090948</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2592084-4</subfield><subfield code="x">16642392</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Bing Zhang
spellingShingle	Bing Zhang misc RC648-665 misc Cushing syndrome misc ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome misc 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose misc 68Ga-DOTANOC misc positron-emission tomography/computed tomography misc Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
authorStr	Bing Zhang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)645090948
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC648-665
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16642392
topic_title	RC648-665 Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome Cushing syndrome ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 68Ga-DOTANOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography
topic	misc RC648-665 misc Cushing syndrome misc ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome misc 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose misc 68Ga-DOTANOC misc positron-emission tomography/computed tomography misc Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
topic_unstemmed	misc RC648-665 misc Cushing syndrome misc ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome misc 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose misc 68Ga-DOTANOC misc positron-emission tomography/computed tomography misc Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
topic_browse	misc RC648-665 misc Cushing syndrome misc ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome misc 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose misc 68Ga-DOTANOC misc positron-emission tomography/computed tomography misc Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Frontiers in Endocrinology
hierarchy_parent_id	645090948
hierarchy_top_title	Frontiers in Endocrinology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)645090948 (DE-600)2592084-4
title	Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ007780141 (DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23
title_full	Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
author_sort	Bing Zhang
journal	Frontiers in Endocrinology
journalStr	Frontiers in Endocrinology
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Bing Zhang Qiao He Yali Long Yuying Zhang Xiaoyan Wang Zhifeng Chen Jianbo Liu Xiangsong Zhang
container_volume	13
class	RC648-665
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Bing Zhang
doi_str_mv	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18f-fdg pet/ct and 68ga-dotanoc pet/ct in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
callnumber	RC648-665
title_auth	Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
abstract	PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.
abstractGer	PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.
abstract_unstemmed	PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome
url	https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800 https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392
remote_bool	true
author2	Qiao He Yali Long Yuying Zhang Xiaoyan Wang Zhifeng Chen Jianbo Liu Xiangsong Zhang
author2Str	Qiao He Yali Long Yuying Zhang Xiaoyan Wang Zhifeng Chen Jianbo Liu Xiangsong Zhang
ppnlink	645090948
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3389/fendo.2022.962800
callnumber-a	RC648-665
up_date	2024-07-03T14:04:07.802Z
_version_	1803566918209110017
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ007780141</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307024223.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fendo.2022.962800</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ007780141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC648-665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bing Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PurposeFluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 (68Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS.MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared.ResultsIn 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p &lt; 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p &lt; 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p &gt;0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p &lt; 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p &gt; 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p &gt; 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p &lt; 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p &gt; 0.05).Conclusion68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while 18F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cushing syndrome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">18F-fluorodeoxyglucose</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">68Ga-DOTANOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positron-emission tomography/computed tomography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qiao He</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yali Long</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoyan Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhifeng Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jianbo Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiangsong Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Endocrinology</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)645090948</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2592084-4</subfield><subfield code="x">16642392</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/22b9c97749214511a411a5adb84c7e23</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3981

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?