Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity
Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further at...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi [verfasserIn] Reza Naghdivand [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies - Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019, 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:2017 ; number:4 ; pages:67-84 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ008079331 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ008079331 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310003518.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.30479/elt.2017.1532 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ008079331 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a PE1-3729 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Mohammad Nabi Karimi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Working Memory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Listening Span Task | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Literal Comprehension | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inferential Comprehension | |
| 653 | 0 | |a English language | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Reza Naghdivand |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |d Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019 |g 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 |w (DE-627)1760630594 |x 26765357 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:67-84 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 2017 |e 4 |h 67-84 | ||
| author_variant |
m n k mnk r n rn |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:26765357:2017----::ieaadneetalseigopeesoteoef1s2ui |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
PE |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 doi (DE-627)DOAJ008079331 (DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng PE1-3729 Mohammad Nabi Karimi verfasserin aut Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. Working Memory Listening Span Task Literal Comprehension Inferential Comprehension English language Reza Naghdivand verfasserin aut In Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 (DE-627)1760630594 26765357 nnns volume:4 year:2017 number:4 pages:67-84 https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad kostenfrei http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 4 2017 4 67-84 |
| spelling |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 doi (DE-627)DOAJ008079331 (DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng PE1-3729 Mohammad Nabi Karimi verfasserin aut Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. Working Memory Listening Span Task Literal Comprehension Inferential Comprehension English language Reza Naghdivand verfasserin aut In Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 (DE-627)1760630594 26765357 nnns volume:4 year:2017 number:4 pages:67-84 https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad kostenfrei http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 4 2017 4 67-84 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 doi (DE-627)DOAJ008079331 (DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng PE1-3729 Mohammad Nabi Karimi verfasserin aut Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. Working Memory Listening Span Task Literal Comprehension Inferential Comprehension English language Reza Naghdivand verfasserin aut In Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 (DE-627)1760630594 26765357 nnns volume:4 year:2017 number:4 pages:67-84 https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad kostenfrei http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 4 2017 4 67-84 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 doi (DE-627)DOAJ008079331 (DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng PE1-3729 Mohammad Nabi Karimi verfasserin aut Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. Working Memory Listening Span Task Literal Comprehension Inferential Comprehension English language Reza Naghdivand verfasserin aut In Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 (DE-627)1760630594 26765357 nnns volume:4 year:2017 number:4 pages:67-84 https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad kostenfrei http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 4 2017 4 67-84 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 doi (DE-627)DOAJ008079331 (DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng PE1-3729 Mohammad Nabi Karimi verfasserin aut Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. Working Memory Listening Span Task Literal Comprehension Inferential Comprehension English language Reza Naghdivand verfasserin aut In Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 (DE-627)1760630594 26765357 nnns volume:4 year:2017 number:4 pages:67-84 https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad kostenfrei http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 4 2017 4 67-84 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 volume:4 year:2017 number:4 pages:67-84 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84 volume:4 year:2017 number:4 pages:67-84 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Working Memory Listening Span Task Literal Comprehension Inferential Comprehension English language |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi @@aut@@ Reza Naghdivand @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760630594 |
| id |
DOAJ008079331 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ008079331</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310003518.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.30479/elt.2017.1532</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ008079331</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PE1-3729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Nabi Karimi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Working Memory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Listening Span Task</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Literal Comprehension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inferential Comprehension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reza Naghdivand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760630594</subfield><subfield code="x">26765357</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:67-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">67-84</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
P - Language and Literature |
| author |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi |
| spellingShingle |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi misc PE1-3729 misc Working Memory misc Listening Span Task misc Literal Comprehension misc Inferential Comprehension misc English language Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity |
| authorStr |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760630594 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
PE1-3729 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
26765357 |
| topic_title |
PE1-3729 Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity Working Memory Listening Span Task Literal Comprehension Inferential Comprehension |
| topic |
misc PE1-3729 misc Working Memory misc Listening Span Task misc Literal Comprehension misc Inferential Comprehension misc English language |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc PE1-3729 misc Working Memory misc Listening Span Task misc Literal Comprehension misc Inferential Comprehension misc English language |
| topic_browse |
misc PE1-3729 misc Working Memory misc Listening Span Task misc Literal Comprehension misc Inferential Comprehension misc English language |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760630594 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760630594 |
| title |
Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ008079331 (DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad |
| title_full |
Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity |
| author_sort |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi |
| journal |
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| journalStr |
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| callnumber-first-code |
P |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
67 |
| author_browse |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi Reza Naghdivand |
| container_volume |
4 |
| class |
PE1-3729 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mohammad Nabi Karimi |
| doi_str_mv |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
literal and inferential listening comprehension: the role of l1 vs. l2 auditory working memory capacity |
| callnumber |
PE1-3729 |
| title_auth |
Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity |
| abstract |
Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. |
| abstractGer |
Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532 https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Reza Naghdivand |
| author2Str |
Reza Naghdivand |
| ppnlink |
1760630594 |
| callnumber-subject |
PE - English Languages |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.30479/elt.2017.1532 |
| callnumber-a |
PE1-3729 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:51:28.811Z |
| _version_ |
1803573672165769217 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ008079331</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310003518.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.30479/elt.2017.1532</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ008079331</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PE1-3729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Nabi Karimi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Literal and Inferential Listening Comprehension: The Role of L1 vs. L2 Auditory Working Memory Capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Working memory capacity, especially as it relates to L1 vs. L2, has been found to play a significant role in language comprehension and processing. Majority of the related studies have, however, been focused around reading comprehension, either in L1 or L2 contexts. The present study is a further attempt to investigate the role of working memory capacity in language comprehension/processing but in the context of L2 listening. To this end, a sample of 220 foreign language learners (both males and females) were recruited. To collect the required data, a series of measures including a language proficiency test, two auditory working memory capacity tasks (English & Persian) and two listening comprehension passages were administered to the participants. The results showed a significant relationship between Persian and English auditory memories for storage dimension but not for the processing component. Additionally, the findings showed that L2 auditory memory is more highly correlated with L2 listening comprehension compared with L1 auditory memory. A further finding of the study was that literal vs. inferential types of listening comprehension engage different types of working memory processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Working Memory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Listening Span Task</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Literal Comprehension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inferential Comprehension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reza Naghdivand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2017), 4, Seite 67-84</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760630594</subfield><subfield code="x">26765357</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:67-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.30479/elt.2017.1532</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e55457522be74847a29c0846d20e2cad</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1532_24d41743b3c89211ae74404fdb8077a7.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2676-5357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">67-84</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399441 |