Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations?
Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States te...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
André Panno Beirão [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Spanisch ; Französisch ; Portugiesisch |
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007 |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ009272429 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ009272429 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310015804.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||spa c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ009272429 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a spa |a fre |a por | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JZ2-6530 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a André Panno Beirão |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Maritime Peace Operations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Maritime Security | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law of the Sea | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Piracy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Defence Arrangements | |
| 653 | 0 | |a International relations | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Contexto Internacional |d Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007 |w (DE-627)562076832 |w (DE-600)2420383-X |x 19820240 |7 nnns |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| author_variant |
a p b apb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:19820240:uuuuuuuu::hntmnnlmrtmupaee |
| callnumber-subject-code |
JZ |
| allfields |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009272429 (DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb spa fre por JZ2-6530 André Panno Beirão verfasserin aut Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. Maritime Peace Operations Maritime Security Law of the Sea Piracy Defence Arrangements International relations In Contexto Internacional Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007 (DE-627)562076832 (DE-600)2420383-X 19820240 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| spelling |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009272429 (DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb spa fre por JZ2-6530 André Panno Beirão verfasserin aut Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. Maritime Peace Operations Maritime Security Law of the Sea Piracy Defence Arrangements International relations In Contexto Internacional Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007 (DE-627)562076832 (DE-600)2420383-X 19820240 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009272429 (DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb spa fre por JZ2-6530 André Panno Beirão verfasserin aut Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. Maritime Peace Operations Maritime Security Law of the Sea Piracy Defence Arrangements International relations In Contexto Internacional Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007 (DE-627)562076832 (DE-600)2420383-X 19820240 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009272429 (DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb spa fre por JZ2-6530 André Panno Beirão verfasserin aut Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. Maritime Peace Operations Maritime Security Law of the Sea Piracy Defence Arrangements International relations In Contexto Internacional Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007 (DE-627)562076832 (DE-600)2420383-X 19820240 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009272429 (DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb spa fre por JZ2-6530 André Panno Beirão verfasserin aut Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. Maritime Peace Operations Maritime Security Law of the Sea Piracy Defence Arrangements International relations In Contexto Internacional Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007 (DE-627)562076832 (DE-600)2420383-X 19820240 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| language |
Spanish French Portuguese |
| source |
In Contexto Internacional |
| sourceStr |
In Contexto Internacional |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Maritime Peace Operations Maritime Security Law of the Sea Piracy Defence Arrangements International relations |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Contexto Internacional |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
André Panno Beirão @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
562076832 |
| id |
DOAJ009272429 |
| language_de |
spanisch franzoesisch portugiesisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009272429</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310015804.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||spa c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009272429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">André Panno Beirão</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maritime Peace Operations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maritime Security</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law of the Sea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Piracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Defence Arrangements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Contexto Internacional</subfield><subfield code="d">Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)562076832</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2420383-X</subfield><subfield code="x">19820240</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
| author |
André Panno Beirão |
| spellingShingle |
André Panno Beirão misc JZ2-6530 misc Maritime Peace Operations misc Maritime Security misc Law of the Sea misc Piracy misc Defence Arrangements misc International relations Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? |
| authorStr |
André Panno Beirão |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)562076832 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
JZ2-6530 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
19820240 |
| topic_title |
JZ2-6530 Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? Maritime Peace Operations Maritime Security Law of the Sea Piracy Defence Arrangements |
| topic |
misc JZ2-6530 misc Maritime Peace Operations misc Maritime Security misc Law of the Sea misc Piracy misc Defence Arrangements misc International relations |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc JZ2-6530 misc Maritime Peace Operations misc Maritime Security misc Law of the Sea misc Piracy misc Defence Arrangements misc International relations |
| topic_browse |
misc JZ2-6530 misc Maritime Peace Operations misc Maritime Security misc Law of the Sea misc Piracy misc Defence Arrangements misc International relations |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Contexto Internacional |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
562076832 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Contexto Internacional |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)562076832 (DE-600)2420383-X |
| title |
Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ009272429 (DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 |
| title_full |
Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? |
| author_sort |
André Panno Beirão |
| journal |
Contexto Internacional |
| journalStr |
Contexto Internacional |
| callnumber-first-code |
J |
| lang_code |
spa fre por |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
André Panno Beirão |
| class |
JZ2-6530 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
André Panno Beirão |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 |
| title_sort |
why not eminently maritime un peacekeeping operations? |
| callnumber |
JZ2-6530 |
| title_auth |
Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? |
| abstract |
Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| title_short |
Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136 http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
562076832 |
| callnumber-subject |
JZ - International Relations |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003 |
| callnumber-a |
JZ2-6530 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:52:22.716Z |
| _version_ |
1803600152721620992 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009272429</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310015804.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||spa c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009272429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">André Panno Beirão</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maritime Peace Operations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maritime Security</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law of the Sea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Piracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Defence Arrangements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Contexto Internacional</subfield><subfield code="d">Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2007</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)562076832</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2420383-X</subfield><subfield code="x">19820240</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200003</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6408b890c90c4a8c911ef37ade226136</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200245&lng=en&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1982-0240</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4008236 |