Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Yves Boquet [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Französisch |
Erschienen: |
2011 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Territoire en Mouvement - Université Lille 1, 2016, 10(2011), Seite 16-35 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:10 ; year:2011 ; pages:16-35 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.4000/tem.1115 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ009519149 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ009519149 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503070051.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4000/tem.1115 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a fre | ||
050 | 0 | |a G1-922 | |
100 | 0 | |a Yves Boquet |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 3 | |a Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. | ||
650 | 4 | |a port | |
650 | 4 | |a maritime range | |
650 | 4 | |a landbridge | |
650 | 4 | |a inland port | |
650 | 4 | |a deregulation | |
650 | 4 | |a Baltimore | |
653 | 0 | |a Geography (General) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Territoire en Mouvement |d Université Lille 1, 2016 |g 10(2011), Seite 16-35 |w (DE-627)773469575 |w (DE-600)2743846-6 |x 19505698 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2011 |g pages:16-35 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 10 |j 2011 |h 16-35 |
author_variant |
y b yb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:19505698:2011----::eoteatmrdnlcmttoitrotaraxasnsnr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
callnumber-subject-code |
G |
publishDate |
2011 |
allfields |
10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35 |
spelling |
10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35 |
allfieldsGer |
10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35 |
allfieldsSound |
10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35 |
language |
English French |
source |
In Territoire en Mouvement 10(2011), Seite 16-35 volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 |
sourceStr |
In Territoire en Mouvement 10(2011), Seite 16-35 volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Territoire en Mouvement |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Yves Boquet @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
773469575 |
id |
DOAJ009519149 |
language_de |
englisch franzoesisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009519149</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503070051.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009519149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">G1-922</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yves Boquet</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">maritime range</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landbridge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inland port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deregulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Baltimore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Geography (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Territoire en Mouvement</subfield><subfield code="d">Université Lille 1, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2011), Seite 16-35</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)773469575</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2743846-6</subfield><subfield code="x">19505698</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="h">16-35</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
G - Geography, Anthropology, Recreation |
author |
Yves Boquet |
spellingShingle |
Yves Boquet misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General) Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche |
authorStr |
Yves Boquet |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)773469575 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
G1-922 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
19505698 |
topic_title |
G1-922 Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore |
topic |
misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General) |
topic_browse |
misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Territoire en Mouvement |
hierarchy_parent_id |
773469575 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Territoire en Mouvement |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 |
title |
Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b |
title_full |
Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche |
author_sort |
Yves Boquet |
journal |
Territoire en Mouvement |
journalStr |
Territoire en Mouvement |
callnumber-first-code |
G |
lang_code |
eng fre |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2011 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
16 |
author_browse |
Yves Boquet |
container_volume |
10 |
class |
G1-922 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Yves Boquet |
doi_str_mv |
10.4000/tem.1115 |
title_sort |
port de baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux états-unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche |
callnumber |
G1-922 |
title_auth |
Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche |
abstract |
The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. |
abstractGer |
The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche |
url |
https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
773469575 |
callnumber-subject |
G - General Geography |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.4000/tem.1115 |
callnumber-a |
G1-922 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:59:05.230Z |
_version_ |
1803604349665935360 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009519149</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503070051.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009519149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">G1-922</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yves Boquet</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">maritime range</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landbridge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inland port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deregulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Baltimore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Geography (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Territoire en Mouvement</subfield><subfield code="d">Université Lille 1, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2011), Seite 16-35</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)773469575</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2743846-6</subfield><subfield code="x">19505698</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="h">16-35</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400051 |