Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche

The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Yves Boquet [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Französisch

Erschienen:	2011

Schlagwörter:	port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Territoire en Mouvement - Université Lille 1, 2016, 10(2011), Seite 16-35
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:10 ; year:2011 ; pages:16-35

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.4000/tem.1115

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ009519149

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ009519149
003	DE-627
005	20230503070051.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.4000/tem.1115 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ009519149
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a fre
050		0	\|a G1-922
100	0		\|a Yves Boquet \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	3	\|a Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
264		1	\|c 2011
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.
650		4	\|a port
650		4	\|a maritime range
650		4	\|a landbridge
650		4	\|a inland port
650		4	\|a deregulation
650		4	\|a Baltimore
653		0	\|a Geography (General)
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Territoire en Mouvement \|d Université Lille 1, 2016 \|g 10(2011), Seite 16-35 \|w (DE-627)773469575 \|w (DE-600)2743846-6 \|x 19505698 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:10 \|g year:2011 \|g pages:16-35
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 10 \|j 2011 \|h 16-35

Indexfelder

author_variant	y b yb
matchkey_str	article:19505698:2011----::eoteatmrdnlcmttoitrotaraxasnsnr
hierarchy_sort_str	2011
callnumber-subject-code	G
publishDate	2011
allfields	10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35
spelling	10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35
allfields_unstemmed	10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35
allfieldsGer	10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35
allfieldsSound	10.4000/tem.1115 doi (DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre G1-922 Yves Boquet verfasserin aut Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges. port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General) In Territoire en Mouvement Université Lille 1, 2016 10(2011), Seite 16-35 (DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6 19505698 nnns volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35 https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2011 16-35
language	English French
source	In Territoire en Mouvement 10(2011), Seite 16-35 volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35
sourceStr	In Territoire en Mouvement 10(2011), Seite 16-35 volume:10 year:2011 pages:16-35
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore Geography (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Territoire en Mouvement
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Yves Boquet @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	773469575
id	DOAJ009519149
language_de	englisch franzoesisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009519149</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503070051.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009519149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">G1-922</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yves Boquet</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">maritime range</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landbridge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inland port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deregulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Baltimore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Geography (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Territoire en Mouvement</subfield><subfield code="d">Université Lille 1, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2011), Seite 16-35</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)773469575</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2743846-6</subfield><subfield code="x">19505698</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="h">16-35</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	G - Geography, Anthropology, Recreation
author	Yves Boquet
spellingShingle	Yves Boquet misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General) Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
authorStr	Yves Boquet
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)773469575
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	G1-922
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	19505698
topic_title	G1-922 Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche port maritime range landbridge inland port deregulation Baltimore
topic	misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General)
topic_browse	misc G1-922 misc port misc maritime range misc landbridge misc inland port misc deregulation misc Baltimore misc Geography (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Territoire en Mouvement
hierarchy_parent_id	773469575
hierarchy_top_title	Territoire en Mouvement
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)773469575 (DE-600)2743846-6
title	Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ009519149 (DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b
title_full	Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
author_sort	Yves Boquet
journal	Territoire en Mouvement
journalStr	Territoire en Mouvement
callnumber-first-code	G
lang_code	eng fre
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2011
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	16
author_browse	Yves Boquet
container_volume	10
class	G1-922
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Yves Boquet
doi_str_mv	10.4000/tem.1115
title_sort	port de baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux états-unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
callnumber	G1-922
title_auth	Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
abstract	The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.
abstractGer	The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.
abstract_unstemmed	The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche
url	https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115 https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115 https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	773469575
callnumber-subject	G - General Geography
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.4000/tem.1115
callnumber-a	G1-922
up_date	2024-07-03T23:59:05.230Z
_version_	1803604349665935360
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009519149</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503070051.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009519149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">G1-922</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yves Boquet</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The port of Baltimore, which used to be one of most active in the United States, has seen his relative importance shrink in the last decades. Even if his location has the advantage of a closer proximity with inland markets of the industrial Middle West, its position upstream in Cheapeake Bay appears quite disadvantageous in comparison with Norfolk/Hampton News, a port complex which, on the contrary, has immediate access to oceanic waters. The decline of Baltimore can be explained by the strategies of shipping companies, which tend to concentrate traffic on major load centers, and the difficult access to a port far from the Atlantic, but also by the effects of American railroad and trucking deregulations in the early 1980s. Access from the West is limited by tunnels, hindering the development in Baltimore of continental double-stack container landbridge traffic from West coast ports. In view of the high growth of Western and Southeastern ports, Baltimore has specialized on two main markets : Appalachian coal exports, and international ro-ro for the export/import of automobiles. Abandoned port facilities have been converted into touristic areas with an emphasis on the heritage of an industrial port. But the image projected is more and more disconnected from the realities of the Maryland harbor. This case study illustrates the general phenomenon of the increasing port hierarchy within maritime ranges.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">maritime range</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landbridge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inland port</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deregulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Baltimore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Geography (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Territoire en Mouvement</subfield><subfield code="d">Université Lille 1, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2011), Seite 16-35</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)773469575</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2743846-6</subfield><subfield code="x">19505698</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0982ccaf3516417ea0054b2b669c482b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/tem/1115</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1950-5698</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="h">16-35</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400051

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Le port de Baltimore dans la compétition interportuaire aux États-Unis : entre déclin et stratégie de niche

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?