Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review
Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity i...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ceceilia Parnther [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies - Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022, 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2020 ; number:1 ; pages:25-45 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ009681094 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ009681094 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310021908.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ009681094 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Ceceilia Parnther |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a academic integrity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a academic honesty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a plagiarism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cheating | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Education | |
| 653 | 0 | |a L | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies |d Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022 |g 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000146994 |x 27171426 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:25-45 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 2020 |e 1 |h 25-45 | ||
| author_variant |
c p cp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:27171426:2020----::cdmcicnutnihrdctoao |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ009681094 (DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ceceilia Parnther verfasserin aut Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. academic integrity academic honesty plagiarism cheating Education L In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 (DE-627)DOAJ000146994 27171426 nnns volume:1 year:2020 number:1 pages:25-45 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 kostenfrei https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2020 1 25-45 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ009681094 (DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ceceilia Parnther verfasserin aut Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. academic integrity academic honesty plagiarism cheating Education L In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 (DE-627)DOAJ000146994 27171426 nnns volume:1 year:2020 number:1 pages:25-45 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 kostenfrei https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2020 1 25-45 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ009681094 (DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ceceilia Parnther verfasserin aut Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. academic integrity academic honesty plagiarism cheating Education L In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 (DE-627)DOAJ000146994 27171426 nnns volume:1 year:2020 number:1 pages:25-45 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 kostenfrei https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2020 1 25-45 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ009681094 (DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ceceilia Parnther verfasserin aut Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. academic integrity academic honesty plagiarism cheating Education L In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 (DE-627)DOAJ000146994 27171426 nnns volume:1 year:2020 number:1 pages:25-45 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 kostenfrei https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2020 1 25-45 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ009681094 (DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ceceilia Parnther verfasserin aut Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. academic integrity academic honesty plagiarism cheating Education L In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 (DE-627)DOAJ000146994 27171426 nnns volume:1 year:2020 number:1 pages:25-45 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 kostenfrei https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2020 1 25-45 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 volume:1 year:2020 number:1 pages:25-45 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies 1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45 volume:1 year:2020 number:1 pages:25-45 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
academic integrity academic honesty plagiarism cheating Education L |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ceceilia Parnther @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ000146994 |
| id |
DOAJ009681094 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009681094</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310021908.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009681094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ceceilia Parnther</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">academic integrity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">academic honesty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plagiarism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cheating</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000146994</subfield><subfield code="x">27171426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:25-45</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">25-45</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ceceilia Parnther |
| spellingShingle |
Ceceilia Parnther misc academic integrity misc academic honesty misc plagiarism misc cheating misc Education misc L Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review |
| authorStr |
Ceceilia Parnther |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ000146994 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
27171426 |
| topic_title |
Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review academic integrity academic honesty plagiarism cheating |
| topic |
misc academic integrity misc academic honesty misc plagiarism misc cheating misc Education misc L |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc academic integrity misc academic honesty misc plagiarism misc cheating misc Education misc L |
| topic_browse |
misc academic integrity misc academic honesty misc plagiarism misc cheating misc Education misc L |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ000146994 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ000146994 |
| title |
Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ009681094 (DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 |
| title_full |
Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review |
| author_sort |
Ceceilia Parnther |
| journal |
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies |
| journalStr |
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
25 |
| author_browse |
Ceceilia Parnther |
| container_volume |
1 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ceceilia Parnther |
| title_sort |
academic misconduct in higher education: a comprehensive review |
| title_auth |
Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review |
| abstract |
Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. |
| abstractGer |
Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25 https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1 https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ000146994 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:37:29.350Z |
| _version_ |
1803606765707722752 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ009681094</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310021908.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ009681094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ceceilia Parnther</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Academic ethics and integrity are necessary elements of quality education. The need for academic integrity education on campuses has been well documented (Bertram Gallant, 2008, 2020; Bertram Gallant & Drinan, 2008; Liebler, 2009; McCabe, Butterfield, & Trevino, 2004). Academic integrity is a cornerstone of the learning process. Higher education institutions have the opportunity to promote academic integrity and prevent academic misconduct on campus by providing clear guidelines, equitable resolutions, and student and faculty engagement. A contextual review examined the components of academic integrity education from the perspectives of faculty and students to explore the complexity of academic integrity. In all, a review of 39 articles elucidate characteristics of students exhibiting academically dishonest behaviours, best practices in prevention, and current challenges to preventing academic misconduct and promote academic integrity. The resulting conceptualization reveals a change in academic integrity education over time, including policy revisions and the role of stakeholders. Recommendations for higher education leaders include increased student engagement, increased opportunities for part-time faculty to share and disseminate ideas, demonstrated student learning, and a clear policy and shared mission. This study adds to the body of knowledge of academic integrity research, namely the promotion of academic integrity and prevention of academic misconduct.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">academic integrity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">academic honesty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plagiarism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cheating</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Ali Khorsandi Taskoh, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2020), 1, Seite 25-45</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000146994</subfield><subfield code="x">27171426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:25-45</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6d478a317fdd48d7ac37a55bbe0350e1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://johepal.com/article-1-31-en.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2717-1426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">25-45</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4007006 |