Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation
The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metala...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jean-François Bordron [verfasserIn] Audrey Moutat [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Französisch |
Erschienen: |
2013 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Signata - Université de liège, 2020, 4(2013), Seite 273-294 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:2013 ; pages:273-294 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.4000/signata.974 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ010509372 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ010509372 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230310025919.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4000/signata.974 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ010509372 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a fre | ||
100 | 0 | |a Jean-François Bordron |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. | ||
650 | 4 | |a meta-language | |
650 | 4 | |a perception | |
650 | 4 | |a epi‑linguistic | |
653 | 0 | |a Language and Literature | |
653 | 0 | |a P | |
700 | 0 | |a Audrey Moutat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Signata |d Université de liège, 2020 |g 4(2013), Seite 273-294 |w (DE-627)102973142X |w (DE-600)2940776-X |x 25657097 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2013 |g pages:273-294 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4392 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 4 |j 2013 |h 273-294 |
author_variant |
j f b jfb a m am |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:25657097:2013----::tlnaetimoiulxmldlxq |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2013 |
publishDate |
2013 |
allfields |
10.4000/signata.974 doi (DE-627)DOAJ010509372 (DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre Jean-François Bordron verfasserin aut Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. meta-language perception epi‑linguistic Language and Literature P Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut In Signata Université de liège, 2020 4(2013), Seite 273-294 (DE-627)102973142X (DE-600)2940776-X 25657097 nnns volume:4 year:2013 pages:273-294 https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2013 273-294 |
spelling |
10.4000/signata.974 doi (DE-627)DOAJ010509372 (DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre Jean-François Bordron verfasserin aut Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. meta-language perception epi‑linguistic Language and Literature P Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut In Signata Université de liège, 2020 4(2013), Seite 273-294 (DE-627)102973142X (DE-600)2940776-X 25657097 nnns volume:4 year:2013 pages:273-294 https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2013 273-294 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.4000/signata.974 doi (DE-627)DOAJ010509372 (DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre Jean-François Bordron verfasserin aut Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. meta-language perception epi‑linguistic Language and Literature P Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut In Signata Université de liège, 2020 4(2013), Seite 273-294 (DE-627)102973142X (DE-600)2940776-X 25657097 nnns volume:4 year:2013 pages:273-294 https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2013 273-294 |
allfieldsGer |
10.4000/signata.974 doi (DE-627)DOAJ010509372 (DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre Jean-François Bordron verfasserin aut Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. meta-language perception epi‑linguistic Language and Literature P Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut In Signata Université de liège, 2020 4(2013), Seite 273-294 (DE-627)102973142X (DE-600)2940776-X 25657097 nnns volume:4 year:2013 pages:273-294 https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2013 273-294 |
allfieldsSound |
10.4000/signata.974 doi (DE-627)DOAJ010509372 (DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre Jean-François Bordron verfasserin aut Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. meta-language perception epi‑linguistic Language and Literature P Audrey Moutat verfasserin aut In Signata Université de liège, 2020 4(2013), Seite 273-294 (DE-627)102973142X (DE-600)2940776-X 25657097 nnns volume:4 year:2013 pages:273-294 https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 kostenfrei http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2013 273-294 |
language |
English French |
source |
In Signata 4(2013), Seite 273-294 volume:4 year:2013 pages:273-294 |
sourceStr |
In Signata 4(2013), Seite 273-294 volume:4 year:2013 pages:273-294 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
meta-language perception epi‑linguistic Language and Literature P |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Signata |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jean-François Bordron @@aut@@ Audrey Moutat @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
102973142X |
id |
DOAJ010509372 |
language_de |
englisch franzoesisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ010509372</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310025919.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/signata.974</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ010509372</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jean-François Bordron</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">meta-language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">perception</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">epi‑linguistic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Language and Literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Audrey Moutat</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Signata</subfield><subfield code="d">Université de liège, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2013), Seite 273-294</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)102973142X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2940776-X</subfield><subfield code="x">25657097</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:273-294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="h">273-294</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jean-François Bordron |
spellingShingle |
Jean-François Bordron misc meta-language misc perception misc epi‑linguistic misc Language and Literature misc P Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation |
authorStr |
Jean-François Bordron |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)102973142X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
25657097 |
topic_title |
Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation meta-language perception epi‑linguistic |
topic |
misc meta-language misc perception misc epi‑linguistic misc Language and Literature misc P |
topic_unstemmed |
misc meta-language misc perception misc epi‑linguistic misc Language and Literature misc P |
topic_browse |
misc meta-language misc perception misc epi‑linguistic misc Language and Literature misc P |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Signata |
hierarchy_parent_id |
102973142X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Signata |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)102973142X (DE-600)2940776-X |
title |
Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ010509372 (DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 |
title_full |
Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation |
author_sort |
Jean-François Bordron |
journal |
Signata |
journalStr |
Signata |
lang_code |
eng fre |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2013 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
273 |
author_browse |
Jean-François Bordron Audrey Moutat |
container_volume |
4 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jean-François Bordron |
doi_str_mv |
10.4000/signata.974 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
métalangage et épi-sémiotique : l’exemple du lexique de la dégustation |
title_auth |
Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation |
abstract |
The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. |
abstractGer |
The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation |
url |
https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974 https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44 http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974 https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Audrey Moutat |
author2Str |
Audrey Moutat |
ppnlink |
102973142X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.4000/signata.974 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:13:42.002Z |
_version_ |
1803571295162466304 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ010509372</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310025919.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4000/signata.974</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ010509372</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jean-François Bordron</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Métalangage et épi-sémiotique : L’exemple du lexique de la dégustation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this paper is a reflection about metalanguage led in two parts: at first, the relationships between metalanguage and language-object will be studied and the lower limit of their claimed hierarchy will be questioned. In a second part, the authors will consider the emergence of a metalanguage by taking support on the practice institutionalized by the tasting of wines. Such an essay on this terminological setting up focuses the problem of metalanguage not only on the facts of language but also, and specially, on a meta-semiotical relationship. This leads the authors to reconsider the hierarchical conception of the metalanguage for the benefit of a cyclic process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">meta-language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">perception</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">epi‑linguistic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Language and Literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Audrey Moutat</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Signata</subfield><subfield code="d">Université de liège, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2013), Seite 273-294</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)102973142X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2940776-X</subfield><subfield code="x">25657097</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:273-294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.974</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d143cb6cb218418c835d49d30b577d44</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.openedition.org/signata/974</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2032-9806</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="h">273-294</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.398573 |