The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study

<i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Yasutake Tomata [verfasserIn] Takashi Watanabe [verfasserIn] Fumiya Tanji [verfasserIn] Shu Zhang [verfasserIn] Yumi Sugawara [verfasserIn] Ichiro Tsuji [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2018

Schlagwörter:	psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health - MDPI AG, 2005, 15(2018), 11, p 2502
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:15 ; year:2018 ; number:11, p 2502

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/ijerph15112502

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ012360279

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ012360279
003	DE-627
005	20230502074005.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230225s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/ijerph15112502 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ012360279
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Yasutake Tomata \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study
264		1	\|c 2018
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a <i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort.
650		4	\|a psychological distress
650		4	\|a K6
650		4	\|a disability
650		4	\|a elderly
650		4	\|a population attributable fraction
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
700	0		\|a Takashi Watanabe \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Fumiya Tanji \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Shu Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yumi Sugawara \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ichiro Tsuji \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health \|d MDPI AG, 2005 \|g 15(2018), 11, p 2502 \|w (DE-627)477992463 \|w (DE-600)2175195-X \|x 16604601 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:15 \|g year:2018 \|g number:11, p 2502
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 15 \|j 2018 \|e 11, p 2502

Indexfelder

author_variant	y t yt t w tw f t ft s z sz y s ys i t it
matchkey_str	article:16604601:2018----::hipcopyhlgclitesnnietucinliaiiynleljp
hierarchy_sort_str	2018
publishDate	2018
allfields	10.3390/ijerph15112502 doi (DE-627)DOAJ012360279 (DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Yasutake Tomata verfasserin aut The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort. psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction Medicine R Takashi Watanabe verfasserin aut Fumiya Tanji verfasserin aut Shu Zhang verfasserin aut Yumi Sugawara verfasserin aut Ichiro Tsuji verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 15(2018), 11, p 2502 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:15 year:2018 number:11, p 2502 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2018 11, p 2502
spelling	10.3390/ijerph15112502 doi (DE-627)DOAJ012360279 (DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Yasutake Tomata verfasserin aut The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort. psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction Medicine R Takashi Watanabe verfasserin aut Fumiya Tanji verfasserin aut Shu Zhang verfasserin aut Yumi Sugawara verfasserin aut Ichiro Tsuji verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 15(2018), 11, p 2502 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:15 year:2018 number:11, p 2502 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2018 11, p 2502
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/ijerph15112502 doi (DE-627)DOAJ012360279 (DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Yasutake Tomata verfasserin aut The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort. psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction Medicine R Takashi Watanabe verfasserin aut Fumiya Tanji verfasserin aut Shu Zhang verfasserin aut Yumi Sugawara verfasserin aut Ichiro Tsuji verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 15(2018), 11, p 2502 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:15 year:2018 number:11, p 2502 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2018 11, p 2502
allfieldsGer	10.3390/ijerph15112502 doi (DE-627)DOAJ012360279 (DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Yasutake Tomata verfasserin aut The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort. psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction Medicine R Takashi Watanabe verfasserin aut Fumiya Tanji verfasserin aut Shu Zhang verfasserin aut Yumi Sugawara verfasserin aut Ichiro Tsuji verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 15(2018), 11, p 2502 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:15 year:2018 number:11, p 2502 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2018 11, p 2502
allfieldsSound	10.3390/ijerph15112502 doi (DE-627)DOAJ012360279 (DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Yasutake Tomata verfasserin aut The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort. psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction Medicine R Takashi Watanabe verfasserin aut Fumiya Tanji verfasserin aut Shu Zhang verfasserin aut Yumi Sugawara verfasserin aut Ichiro Tsuji verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 15(2018), 11, p 2502 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:15 year:2018 number:11, p 2502 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2018 11, p 2502
language	English
source	In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(2018), 11, p 2502 volume:15 year:2018 number:11, p 2502
sourceStr	In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(2018), 11, p 2502 volume:15 year:2018 number:11, p 2502
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction Medicine R
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Yasutake Tomata @@aut@@ Takashi Watanabe @@aut@@ Fumiya Tanji @@aut@@ Shu Zhang @@aut@@ Yumi Sugawara @@aut@@ Ichiro Tsuji @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	477992463
id	DOAJ012360279
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ012360279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502074005.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/ijerph15112502</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ012360279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yasutake Tomata</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (&lt;5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with &lt;5 points (<i<p</i<-trend &lt; 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">psychological distress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">disability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">elderly</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">population attributable fraction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Takashi Watanabe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fumiya Tanji</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shu Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yumi Sugawara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ichiro Tsuji</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2018), 11, p 2502</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)477992463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2175195-X</subfield><subfield code="x">16604601</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11, p 2502</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">11, p 2502</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Yasutake Tomata
spellingShingle	Yasutake Tomata misc psychological distress misc K6 misc disability misc elderly misc population attributable fraction misc Medicine misc R The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study
authorStr	Yasutake Tomata
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)477992463
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16604601
topic_title	The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study psychological distress K6 disability elderly population attributable fraction
topic	misc psychological distress misc K6 misc disability misc elderly misc population attributable fraction misc Medicine misc R
topic_unstemmed	misc psychological distress misc K6 misc disability misc elderly misc population attributable fraction misc Medicine misc R
topic_browse	misc psychological distress misc K6 misc disability misc elderly misc population attributable fraction misc Medicine misc R
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
hierarchy_parent_id	477992463
hierarchy_top_title	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X
title	The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ012360279 (DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5
title_full	The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study
author_sort	Yasutake Tomata
journal	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
journalStr	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2018
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Yasutake Tomata Takashi Watanabe Fumiya Tanji Shu Zhang Yumi Sugawara Ichiro Tsuji
container_volume	15
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Yasutake Tomata
doi_str_mv	10.3390/ijerph15112502
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in elderly japanese: the ohsaki cohort 2006 study
title_auth	The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study
abstract	<i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort.
abstractGer	<i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort.
abstract_unstemmed	<i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (<5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with <5 points (<i<p</i<-trend < 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	11, p 2502
title_short	The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502 https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5 https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502 https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601
remote_bool	true
author2	Takashi Watanabe Fumiya Tanji Shu Zhang Yumi Sugawara Ichiro Tsuji
author2Str	Takashi Watanabe Fumiya Tanji Shu Zhang Yumi Sugawara Ichiro Tsuji
ppnlink	477992463
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/ijerph15112502
up_date	2024-07-04T00:45:17.163Z
_version_	1803607256245207040
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ012360279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502074005.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230225s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/ijerph15112502</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ012360279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yasutake Tomata</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><i<Background:</i< Although psychological distress is known to be a risk factor for death, there are relatively few data on the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychological distress on incident functional disability in older adults. <i<Methods:</i< We conducted a cohort study of 12,365 disability-free individuals aged ≥65 years who live in Ohsaki City, Japan. In 2006, the level of psychological distress was assessed using the K6 (range: 0⁻24 points). Data on 10-year functional disability were retrieved from the public Long-term Care Insurance database. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) according to the K6 groups (&lt;5, 5⁻9, 10⁻12, and ≥13 points) were estimated. <i<Results:</i< Among 94,636 person-years, incident functional disability occurred in 4533 persons (36.7%). Significantly higher risk was observed in higher K6 score groups. The multiple-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident functional disability were 1.14 (1.06⁻1.22) for 5⁻9 points, 1.28 (1.15⁻1.43) for 10⁻12 points, and 1.62 (1.44⁻1.84) for ≥13 points, in comparison with &lt;5 points (<i<p</i<-trend &lt; 0.001). The PAFs in each of the K6 score groups were 3.0% for 5⁻9 points, 1.7% for 10⁻12 points, and 2.6% for ≥13 points. <i<Conclusions:</i< Even when mild to moderate, psychological distress had a considerable impact on incident functional disability in this cohort.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">psychological distress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">disability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">elderly</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">population attributable fraction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Takashi Watanabe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fumiya Tanji</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shu Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yumi Sugawara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ichiro Tsuji</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2018), 11, p 2502</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)477992463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2175195-X</subfield><subfield code="x">16604601</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11, p 2502</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112502</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9cb73d920f1241419f1a3958ba2426b5</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2502</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">11, p 2502</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398505

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The Impact of Psychological Distress on Incident Functional Disability in Elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?