Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education
here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Beth Tillinghast [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: IAFOR Journal of Education - The International Academic Forum, 2016, 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2020 ; number:2 ; pages:159-174 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ014259281 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ014259281 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230310064435.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.22492/ije.8.2.09 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ014259281 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a LB5-3640 | |
100 | 0 | |a Beth Tillinghast |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. | ||
650 | 4 | |a open educational resources | |
650 | 4 | |a oer-enabled pedagogy | |
650 | 4 | |a utaut | |
650 | 4 | |a oer | |
650 | 4 | |a oer use | |
650 | 4 | |a development | |
653 | 0 | |a Theory and practice of education | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t IAFOR Journal of Education |d The International Academic Forum, 2016 |g 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 |w (DE-627)1760620483 |x 21870594 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g pages:159-174 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/ |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2020 |e 2 |h 159-174 |
author_variant |
b t bt |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21870594:2020----::eeoignpndctoarsucadxlrnornbepd |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
callnumber-subject-code |
LB |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014259281 (DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 Beth Tillinghast verfasserin aut Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. open educational resources oer-enabled pedagogy utaut oer oer use development Theory and practice of education In IAFOR Journal of Education The International Academic Forum, 2016 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 (DE-627)1760620483 21870594 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:2 pages:159-174 https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca kostenfrei https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 8 2020 2 159-174 |
spelling |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014259281 (DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 Beth Tillinghast verfasserin aut Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. open educational resources oer-enabled pedagogy utaut oer oer use development Theory and practice of education In IAFOR Journal of Education The International Academic Forum, 2016 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 (DE-627)1760620483 21870594 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:2 pages:159-174 https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca kostenfrei https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 8 2020 2 159-174 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014259281 (DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 Beth Tillinghast verfasserin aut Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. open educational resources oer-enabled pedagogy utaut oer oer use development Theory and practice of education In IAFOR Journal of Education The International Academic Forum, 2016 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 (DE-627)1760620483 21870594 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:2 pages:159-174 https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca kostenfrei https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 8 2020 2 159-174 |
allfieldsGer |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014259281 (DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 Beth Tillinghast verfasserin aut Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. open educational resources oer-enabled pedagogy utaut oer oer use development Theory and practice of education In IAFOR Journal of Education The International Academic Forum, 2016 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 (DE-627)1760620483 21870594 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:2 pages:159-174 https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca kostenfrei https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 8 2020 2 159-174 |
allfieldsSound |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014259281 (DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 Beth Tillinghast verfasserin aut Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. open educational resources oer-enabled pedagogy utaut oer oer use development Theory and practice of education In IAFOR Journal of Education The International Academic Forum, 2016 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 (DE-627)1760620483 21870594 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:2 pages:159-174 https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca kostenfrei https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 8 2020 2 159-174 |
language |
English |
source |
In IAFOR Journal of Education 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 volume:8 year:2020 number:2 pages:159-174 |
sourceStr |
In IAFOR Journal of Education 8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174 volume:8 year:2020 number:2 pages:159-174 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
open educational resources oer-enabled pedagogy utaut oer oer use development Theory and practice of education |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
IAFOR Journal of Education |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Beth Tillinghast @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760620483 |
id |
DOAJ014259281 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ014259281</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310064435.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22492/ije.8.2.09</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ014259281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LB5-3640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beth Tillinghast</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">open educational resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oer-enabled pedagogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">utaut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oer use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theory and practice of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IAFOR Journal of Education</subfield><subfield code="d">The International Academic Forum, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760620483</subfield><subfield code="x">21870594</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:159-174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">159-174</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
L - Education |
author |
Beth Tillinghast |
spellingShingle |
Beth Tillinghast misc LB5-3640 misc open educational resources misc oer-enabled pedagogy misc utaut misc oer misc oer use misc development misc Theory and practice of education Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education |
authorStr |
Beth Tillinghast |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760620483 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
LB5-3640 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
21870594 |
topic_title |
LB5-3640 Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education open educational resources oer-enabled pedagogy utaut oer oer use development |
topic |
misc LB5-3640 misc open educational resources misc oer-enabled pedagogy misc utaut misc oer misc oer use misc development misc Theory and practice of education |
topic_unstemmed |
misc LB5-3640 misc open educational resources misc oer-enabled pedagogy misc utaut misc oer misc oer use misc development misc Theory and practice of education |
topic_browse |
misc LB5-3640 misc open educational resources misc oer-enabled pedagogy misc utaut misc oer misc oer use misc development misc Theory and practice of education |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
IAFOR Journal of Education |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760620483 |
hierarchy_top_title |
IAFOR Journal of Education |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760620483 |
title |
Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ014259281 (DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca |
title_full |
Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education |
author_sort |
Beth Tillinghast |
journal |
IAFOR Journal of Education |
journalStr |
IAFOR Journal of Education |
callnumber-first-code |
L |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
159 |
author_browse |
Beth Tillinghast |
container_volume |
8 |
class |
LB5-3640 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Beth Tillinghast |
doi_str_mv |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 |
title_sort |
developing an open educational resource and exploring oer-enabled pedagogy in higher education |
callnumber |
LB5-3640 |
title_auth |
Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education |
abstract |
here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. |
abstractGer |
here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. |
abstract_unstemmed |
here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4307 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education |
url |
https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09 https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/ https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1760620483 |
callnumber-subject |
LB - Theory and Practice of Education |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.22492/ije.8.2.09 |
callnumber-a |
LB5-3640 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:07:23.753Z |
_version_ |
1803597322654842880 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ014259281</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310064435.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22492/ije.8.2.09</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ014259281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LB5-3640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beth Tillinghast</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">here is a growing trend in higher education to explore the various benefits of Open Educational Resources. This applies not only to the cost benefits, but also to potential pedagogical benefits as well. This study explores the process of developing and implementing an Open Educational Resource for an undergraduate course and experimenting with OER-enabled pedagogy. Interview data provide an account of this process, outlining challenges and highlighting insights, which might prove useful for other professionals contemplating the move toward developing Open Educational Resources. Interview data are also organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs pertaining to attitude, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions. A qualitative interpretive approach was then used to analyze the data. Analysis indicates that most of the constructs can strongly influence faculty to adopt Open Educational Resources but that “social influence” has no effect on adoption. Findings also include reflections on OER-enabled pedagogy as it was applied in the course. These findings indicate that OER-enabled pedagogy has the potential for increasing student engagement, though this potential has not yet been realized. Finally, findings provide an outline of recommendations that might guide others when considering developing and implementing Open Educational Resources.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">open educational resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oer-enabled pedagogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">utaut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oer use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theory and practice of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IAFOR Journal of Education</subfield><subfield code="d">The International Academic Forum, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2020), 2, Seite 159-174</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760620483</subfield><subfield code="x">21870594</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:159-174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.09</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ad5e6fb4a5074bb9b2cca9690dab1eca</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-8-Issue-2/article-9/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2187-0594</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">159-174</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399106 |