Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective

Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Jing An [verfasserIn] Richard S. Middleton [verfasserIn] Yingnan Li [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	cement industry CO CO life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO oxy-combustion CO

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Sustainability - MDPI AG, 2009, 11(2019), 9, p 2626
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:11 ; year:2019 ; number:9, p 2626

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/su11092626

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ014329514

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ014329514
003	DE-627
005	20230310064852.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/su11092626 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ014329514
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TD194-195
050		0	\|a TJ807-830
050		0	\|a GE1-350
100	0		\|a Jing An \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.
650		4	\|a cement industry
650		4	\|a CO<sub<2</sub< emissions
650		4	\|a CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage
650		4	\|a life cycle assessment
650		4	\|a scenario analysis
650		4	\|a post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture
650		4	\|a oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture
653		0	\|a Environmental effects of industries and plants
653		0	\|a Renewable energy sources
653		0	\|a Environmental sciences
700	0		\|a Richard S. Middleton \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yingnan Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Sustainability \|d MDPI AG, 2009 \|g 11(2019), 9, p 2626 \|w (DE-627)610604120 \|w (DE-600)2518383-7 \|x 20711050 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:11 \|g year:2019 \|g number:9, p 2626
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 11 \|j 2019 \|e 9, p 2626

Indexfelder

author_variant	j a ja r s m rsm y l yl
matchkey_str	article:20711050:2019----::niomnapromnenlssfeetrdcinihou2ucpuensoaeeh
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
callnumber-subject-code	TD
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626
spelling	10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626
allfieldsGer	10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626
allfieldsSound	10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626
language	English
source	In Sustainability 11(2019), 9, p 2626 volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626
sourceStr	In Sustainability 11(2019), 9, p 2626 volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Sustainability
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Jing An @@aut@@ Richard S. Middleton @@aut@@ Yingnan Li @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	610604120
id	DOAJ014329514
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ014329514</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310064852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ014329514</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TD194-195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TJ807-830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jing An</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cement industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">life cycle assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scenario analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental effects of industries and plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Renewable energy sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richard S. Middleton</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yingnan Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2019), 9, p 2626</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518383-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20711050</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9, p 2626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">9, p 2626</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Jing An
spellingShingle	Jing An misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
authorStr	Jing An
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)610604120
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TD194-195
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20711050
topic_title	TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture
topic	misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences
topic_unstemmed	misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences
topic_browse	misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Sustainability
hierarchy_parent_id	610604120
hierarchy_top_title	Sustainability
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7
title	Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b
title_full	Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
author_sort	Jing An
journal	Sustainability
journalStr	Sustainability
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Jing An Richard S. Middleton Yingnan Li
container_volume	11
class	TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Jing An
doi_str_mv	10.3390/su11092626
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	environmental performance analysis of cement production with co<sub<2</sub< capture and storage technology in a life-cycle perspective
callnumber	TD194-195
title_auth	Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
abstract	Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.
abstractGer	Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.
abstract_unstemmed	Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	9, p 2626
title_short	Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050
remote_bool	true
author2	Richard S. Middleton Yingnan Li
author2Str	Richard S. Middleton Yingnan Li
ppnlink	610604120
callnumber-subject	TD - Environmental Technology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/su11092626
callnumber-a	TD194-195
up_date	2024-07-03T22:28:47.135Z
_version_	1803598668376309762
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ014329514</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310064852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ014329514</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TD194-195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TJ807-830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jing An</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cement industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">life cycle assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scenario analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental effects of industries and plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Renewable energy sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richard S. Middleton</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yingnan Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2019), 9, p 2626</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518383-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20711050</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9, p 2626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">9, p 2626</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3992634

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?