Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2<...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jing An [verfasserIn] Richard S. Middleton [verfasserIn] Yingnan Li [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Sustainability - MDPI AG, 2009, 11(2019), 9, p 2626 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2019 ; number:9, p 2626 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/su11092626 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ014329514 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ014329514 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230310064852.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/su11092626 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TD194-195 | |
050 | 0 | |a TJ807-830 | |
050 | 0 | |a GE1-350 | |
100 | 0 | |a Jing An |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. | ||
650 | 4 | |a cement industry | |
650 | 4 | |a CO<sub<2</sub< emissions | |
650 | 4 | |a CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage | |
650 | 4 | |a life cycle assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a scenario analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture | |
650 | 4 | |a oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture | |
653 | 0 | |a Environmental effects of industries and plants | |
653 | 0 | |a Renewable energy sources | |
653 | 0 | |a Environmental sciences | |
700 | 0 | |a Richard S. Middleton |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Yingnan Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Sustainability |d MDPI AG, 2009 |g 11(2019), 9, p 2626 |w (DE-627)610604120 |w (DE-600)2518383-7 |x 20711050 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2019 |g number:9, p 2626 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2019 |e 9, p 2626 |
author_variant |
j a ja r s m rsm y l yl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20711050:2019----::niomnapromnenlssfeetrdcinihou2ucpuensoaeeh |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TD |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626 |
spelling |
10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/su11092626 doi (DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Jing An verfasserin aut Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences Richard S. Middleton verfasserin aut Yingnan Li verfasserin aut In Sustainability MDPI AG, 2009 11(2019), 9, p 2626 (DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 20711050 nnns volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2019 9, p 2626 |
language |
English |
source |
In Sustainability 11(2019), 9, p 2626 volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 |
sourceStr |
In Sustainability 11(2019), 9, p 2626 volume:11 year:2019 number:9, p 2626 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Sustainability |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jing An @@aut@@ Richard S. Middleton @@aut@@ Yingnan Li @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
610604120 |
id |
DOAJ014329514 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ014329514</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310064852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ014329514</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TD194-195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TJ807-830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jing An</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cement industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">life cycle assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scenario analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental effects of industries and plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Renewable energy sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richard S. Middleton</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yingnan Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2019), 9, p 2626</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518383-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20711050</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9, p 2626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">9, p 2626</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Jing An |
spellingShingle |
Jing An misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective |
authorStr |
Jing An |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)610604120 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TD194-195 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20711050 |
topic_title |
TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective cement industry CO<sub<2</sub< emissions CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage life cycle assessment scenario analysis post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture |
topic |
misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences |
topic_browse |
misc TD194-195 misc TJ807-830 misc GE1-350 misc cement industry misc CO<sub<2</sub< emissions misc CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage misc life cycle assessment misc scenario analysis misc post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture misc Environmental effects of industries and plants misc Renewable energy sources misc Environmental sciences |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Sustainability |
hierarchy_parent_id |
610604120 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Sustainability |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)610604120 (DE-600)2518383-7 |
title |
Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ014329514 (DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b |
title_full |
Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective |
author_sort |
Jing An |
journal |
Sustainability |
journalStr |
Sustainability |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Jing An Richard S. Middleton Yingnan Li |
container_volume |
11 |
class |
TD194-195 TJ807-830 GE1-350 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jing An |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/su11092626 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
environmental performance analysis of cement production with co<sub<2</sub< capture and storage technology in a life-cycle perspective |
callnumber |
TD194-195 |
title_auth |
Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective |
abstract |
Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. |
abstractGer |
Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
9, p 2626 |
title_short |
Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626 https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626 https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Richard S. Middleton Yingnan Li |
author2Str |
Richard S. Middleton Yingnan Li |
ppnlink |
610604120 |
callnumber-subject |
TD - Environmental Technology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/su11092626 |
callnumber-a |
TD194-195 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:28:47.135Z |
_version_ |
1803598668376309762 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ014329514</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310064852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ014329514</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TD194-195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TJ807-830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jing An</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO<sub<2</sub< Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO<sub<2</sub< intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO<sub<2</sub< emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO<sub<2</sub< transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cement industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO<sub<2</sub< capture and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">life cycle assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scenario analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oxy-combustion CO<sub<2</sub< capture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental effects of industries and plants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Renewable energy sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richard S. Middleton</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yingnan Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2019), 9, p 2626</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518383-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20711050</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9, p 2626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2971717eb50f471cbdfcc997e31eb34b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">9, p 2626</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3992634 |