Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study

Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glas...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	P Ahluwalia [verfasserIn] S Chopra [verfasserIn] A M Thomas [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2012

Schlagwörter:	Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry - Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004, 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:30 ; year:2012 ; number:1 ; pages:41-46

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.4103/0970-4388.95580

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ015334643

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ015334643
003	DE-627
005	20230310073908.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.4103/0970-4388.95580 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ015334643
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RK1-715
100	0		\|a P Ahluwalia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study
264		1	\|c 2012
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry.
650		4	\|a Chlorhexidine
650		4	\|a compressive strength
650		4	\|a diametral tensile strength
650		4	\|a glass ionomer cement
650		4	\|a microleakage
653		0	\|a Dentistry
700	0		\|a S Chopra \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a A M Thomas \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry \|d Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004 \|g 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 \|w (DE-627)461909146 \|w (DE-600)2164554-1 \|x 19983905 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:30 \|g year:2012 \|g number:1 \|g pages:41-46
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 30 \|j 2012 \|e 1 \|h 41-46

Indexfelder

author_variant	p a pa s c sc a m t amt
matchkey_str	article:19983905:2012----::teghhrceitcadagnlelnaiiyfhohxdnmdfega
hierarchy_sort_str	2012
callnumber-subject-code	RK
publishDate	2012
allfields	10.4103/0970-4388.95580 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015334643 (DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 P Ahluwalia verfasserin aut Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry. Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage Dentistry S Chopra verfasserin aut A M Thomas verfasserin aut In Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 (DE-627)461909146 (DE-600)2164554-1 19983905 nnns volume:30 year:2012 number:1 pages:41-46 https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a kostenfrei http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2012 1 41-46
spelling	10.4103/0970-4388.95580 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015334643 (DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 P Ahluwalia verfasserin aut Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry. Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage Dentistry S Chopra verfasserin aut A M Thomas verfasserin aut In Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 (DE-627)461909146 (DE-600)2164554-1 19983905 nnns volume:30 year:2012 number:1 pages:41-46 https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a kostenfrei http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2012 1 41-46
allfields_unstemmed	10.4103/0970-4388.95580 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015334643 (DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 P Ahluwalia verfasserin aut Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry. Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage Dentistry S Chopra verfasserin aut A M Thomas verfasserin aut In Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 (DE-627)461909146 (DE-600)2164554-1 19983905 nnns volume:30 year:2012 number:1 pages:41-46 https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a kostenfrei http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2012 1 41-46
allfieldsGer	10.4103/0970-4388.95580 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015334643 (DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 P Ahluwalia verfasserin aut Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry. Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage Dentistry S Chopra verfasserin aut A M Thomas verfasserin aut In Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 (DE-627)461909146 (DE-600)2164554-1 19983905 nnns volume:30 year:2012 number:1 pages:41-46 https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a kostenfrei http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2012 1 41-46
allfieldsSound	10.4103/0970-4388.95580 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015334643 (DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 P Ahluwalia verfasserin aut Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry. Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage Dentistry S Chopra verfasserin aut A M Thomas verfasserin aut In Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 (DE-627)461909146 (DE-600)2164554-1 19983905 nnns volume:30 year:2012 number:1 pages:41-46 https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a kostenfrei http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 30 2012 1 41-46
language	English
source	In Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 volume:30 year:2012 number:1 pages:41-46
sourceStr	In Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46 volume:30 year:2012 number:1 pages:41-46
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage Dentistry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
authorswithroles_txt_mv	P Ahluwalia @@aut@@ S Chopra @@aut@@ A M Thomas @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	461909146
id	DOAJ015334643
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ015334643</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310073908.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/0970-4388.95580</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ015334643</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P Ahluwalia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chlorhexidine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">compressive strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diametral tensile strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">glass ionomer cement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">microleakage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S Chopra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A M Thomas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)461909146</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2164554-1</subfield><subfield code="x">19983905</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:41-46</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">41-46</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	P Ahluwalia
spellingShingle	P Ahluwalia misc RK1-715 misc Chlorhexidine misc compressive strength misc diametral tensile strength misc glass ionomer cement misc microleakage misc Dentistry Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study
authorStr	P Ahluwalia
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)461909146
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RK1-715
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	19983905
topic_title	RK1-715 Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study Chlorhexidine compressive strength diametral tensile strength glass ionomer cement microleakage
topic	misc RK1-715 misc Chlorhexidine misc compressive strength misc diametral tensile strength misc glass ionomer cement misc microleakage misc Dentistry
topic_unstemmed	misc RK1-715 misc Chlorhexidine misc compressive strength misc diametral tensile strength misc glass ionomer cement misc microleakage misc Dentistry
topic_browse	misc RK1-715 misc Chlorhexidine misc compressive strength misc diametral tensile strength misc glass ionomer cement misc microleakage misc Dentistry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
hierarchy_parent_id	461909146
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)461909146 (DE-600)2164554-1
title	Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ015334643 (DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a
title_full	Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study
author_sort	P Ahluwalia
journal	Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
journalStr	Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2012
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	41
author_browse	P Ahluwalia S Chopra A M Thomas
container_volume	30
class	RK1-715
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	P Ahluwalia
doi_str_mv	10.4103/0970-4388.95580
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study
callnumber	RK1-715
title_auth	Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study
abstract	Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry.
abstractGer	Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry.
abstract_unstemmed	Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study
url	https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580 https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905
remote_bool	true
author2	S Chopra A M Thomas
author2Str	S Chopra A M Thomas
ppnlink	461909146
callnumber-subject	RK - Dentistry
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.4103/0970-4388.95580
callnumber-a	RK1-715
up_date	2024-07-03T14:22:13.475Z
_version_	1803568056626053120
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ015334643</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310073908.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/0970-4388.95580</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ015334643</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P Ahluwalia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: This study was done to compare and evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer cements used in the study were Fuji IX for group I and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement for group II. Materials and Methods: The strength characteristics (compressive and diametral tensile strengths) and microleakage of both the groups were evaluated after 24 h. Student′s "t" test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis of the difference in strength characteristics and microleakage. Results: There was no statistical difference (P<0.05) in the strength characteristics and microleakage of glass ionomer cement and chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that strength characteristics and marginal sealing capability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement were similar to those of glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). So, chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer can be considered as a substitute for glass ionomer cements, especially in pediatric dentistry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chlorhexidine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">compressive strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diametral tensile strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">glass ionomer cement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">microleakage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S Chopra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A M Thomas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2012), 1, Seite 41-46</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)461909146</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2164554-1</subfield><subfield code="x">19983905</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:41-46</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.95580</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bbcec1b8701a4961bc99d2569850f30a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2012;volume=30;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Ahluwalia</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">41-46</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3988037

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?