The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts
As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpow...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
S. V. Korostelev [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Управленческое консультирование - North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019, (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2020 ; number:8 ; pages:55-66 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ015598462 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ015598462 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414200813.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ015598462 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a rus | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JF20-2112 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a S. V. Korostelev |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cyberspace | |
| 650 | 4 | |a targets in informational confrontation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a use of force | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive dimension | |
| 650 | 4 | |a international responsibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a international humanitarian law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political institutions and public administration (General) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Управленческое консультирование |d North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 |g (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 |w (DE-627)1760629421 |x 18168590 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2020 |g number:8 |g pages:55-66 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2020 |e 8 |h 55-66 | ||
| author_variant |
s v k svk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18168590:2020----::hpolmflsiiainfagtiifr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
JF |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015598462 (DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. cyberspace targets in informational confrontation use of force cognitive dimension international responsibility international humanitarian law Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2020 number:8 pages:55-66 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 8 55-66 |
| spelling |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015598462 (DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. cyberspace targets in informational confrontation use of force cognitive dimension international responsibility international humanitarian law Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2020 number:8 pages:55-66 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 8 55-66 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015598462 (DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. cyberspace targets in informational confrontation use of force cognitive dimension international responsibility international humanitarian law Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2020 number:8 pages:55-66 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 8 55-66 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015598462 (DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. cyberspace targets in informational confrontation use of force cognitive dimension international responsibility international humanitarian law Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2020 number:8 pages:55-66 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 8 55-66 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015598462 (DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. cyberspace targets in informational confrontation use of force cognitive dimension international responsibility international humanitarian law Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2020 number:8 pages:55-66 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 8 55-66 |
| language |
English Russian |
| source |
In Управленческое консультирование (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 year:2020 number:8 pages:55-66 |
| sourceStr |
In Управленческое консультирование (2020), 8, Seite 55-66 year:2020 number:8 pages:55-66 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
cyberspace targets in informational confrontation use of force cognitive dimension international responsibility international humanitarian law Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Управленческое консультирование |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
S. V. Korostelev @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760629421 |
| id |
DOAJ015598462 |
| language_de |
englisch russisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ015598462</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414200813.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ015598462</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JF20-2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. V. Korostelev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cyberspace</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">targets in informational confrontation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">use of force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cognitive dimension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international responsibility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international humanitarian law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Управленческое консультирование</subfield><subfield code="d">North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 8, Seite 55-66</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760629421</subfield><subfield code="x">18168590</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">55-66</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
| author |
S. V. Korostelev |
| spellingShingle |
S. V. Korostelev misc JF20-2112 misc cyberspace misc targets in informational confrontation misc use of force misc cognitive dimension misc international responsibility misc international humanitarian law misc Political institutions and public administration (General) The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts |
| authorStr |
S. V. Korostelev |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760629421 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
JF20-2112 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
18168590 |
| topic_title |
JF20-2112 The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts cyberspace targets in informational confrontation use of force cognitive dimension international responsibility international humanitarian law |
| topic |
misc JF20-2112 misc cyberspace misc targets in informational confrontation misc use of force misc cognitive dimension misc international responsibility misc international humanitarian law misc Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc JF20-2112 misc cyberspace misc targets in informational confrontation misc use of force misc cognitive dimension misc international responsibility misc international humanitarian law misc Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| topic_browse |
misc JF20-2112 misc cyberspace misc targets in informational confrontation misc use of force misc cognitive dimension misc international responsibility misc international humanitarian law misc Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Управленческое консультирование |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760629421 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Управленческое консультирование |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760629421 |
| title |
The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ015598462 (DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 |
| title_full |
The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts |
| author_sort |
S. V. Korostelev |
| journal |
Управленческое консультирование |
| journalStr |
Управленческое консультирование |
| callnumber-first-code |
J |
| lang_code |
eng rus |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
55 |
| author_browse |
S. V. Korostelev |
| class |
JF20-2112 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
S. V. Korostelev |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 |
| title_sort |
problem of classification of targets in informational conflicts |
| callnumber |
JF20-2112 |
| title_auth |
The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts |
| abstract |
As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. |
| abstractGer |
As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
8 |
| title_short |
The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783 https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483 https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760629421 |
| callnumber-subject |
JF - Public Administration |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66 |
| callnumber-a |
JF20-2112 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:56:47.566Z |
| _version_ |
1803574006327017472 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ015598462</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414200813.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ015598462</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JF20-2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. V. Korostelev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cyberspace</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">targets in informational confrontation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">use of force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cognitive dimension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international responsibility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international humanitarian law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Управленческое консультирование</subfield><subfield code="d">North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 8, Seite 55-66</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760629421</subfield><subfield code="x">18168590</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-66</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">55-66</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398987 |