Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism
In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
S. V. Korostelev [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
political and legal justification |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Управленческое консультирование - North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019, (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2018 ; number:4 ; pages:16-26 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ015603067 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ015603067 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414200829.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ015603067 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a rus | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JF20-2112 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a S. V. Korostelev |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a use of force | |
| 650 | 4 | |a political and legal justification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a countering terrorism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a internal armed conflict | |
| 650 | 4 | |a international humanitarian law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a other situations of violence | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political institutions and public administration (General) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Управленческое консультирование |d North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 |g (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 |w (DE-627)1760629421 |x 18168590 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2018 |g number:4 |g pages:16-26 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2018 |e 4 |h 16-26 | ||
| author_variant |
s v k svk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18168590:2018----::etrsfhpltclnlglutfctootesofrennenlrecnlcsnoneigerrsa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
JF |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015603067 (DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism internal armed conflict international humanitarian law other situations of violence Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2018 number:4 pages:16-26 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2018 4 16-26 |
| spelling |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015603067 (DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism internal armed conflict international humanitarian law other situations of violence Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2018 number:4 pages:16-26 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2018 4 16-26 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015603067 (DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism internal armed conflict international humanitarian law other situations of violence Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2018 number:4 pages:16-26 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2018 4 16-26 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015603067 (DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism internal armed conflict international humanitarian law other situations of violence Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2018 number:4 pages:16-26 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2018 4 16-26 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 doi (DE-627)DOAJ015603067 (DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JF20-2112 S. V. Korostelev verfasserin aut Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism internal armed conflict international humanitarian law other situations of violence Political institutions and public administration (General) In Управленческое консультирование North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019 (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 (DE-627)1760629421 18168590 nnns year:2018 number:4 pages:16-26 https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa kostenfrei https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2018 4 16-26 |
| language |
English Russian |
| source |
In Управленческое консультирование (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 year:2018 number:4 pages:16-26 |
| sourceStr |
In Управленческое консультирование (2018), 4, Seite 16-26 year:2018 number:4 pages:16-26 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism internal armed conflict international humanitarian law other situations of violence Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Управленческое консультирование |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
S. V. Korostelev @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760629421 |
| id |
DOAJ015603067 |
| language_de |
englisch russisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ015603067</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414200829.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ015603067</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JF20-2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. V. Korostelev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">use of force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political and legal justification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">countering terrorism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">internal armed conflict</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international humanitarian law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">other situations of violence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Управленческое консультирование</subfield><subfield code="d">North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2018), 4, Seite 16-26</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760629421</subfield><subfield code="x">18168590</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">16-26</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
| author |
S. V. Korostelev |
| spellingShingle |
S. V. Korostelev misc JF20-2112 misc use of force misc political and legal justification misc countering terrorism misc internal armed conflict misc international humanitarian law misc other situations of violence misc Political institutions and public administration (General) Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism |
| authorStr |
S. V. Korostelev |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760629421 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
JF20-2112 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
18168590 |
| topic_title |
JF20-2112 Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism internal armed conflict international humanitarian law other situations of violence |
| topic |
misc JF20-2112 misc use of force misc political and legal justification misc countering terrorism misc internal armed conflict misc international humanitarian law misc other situations of violence misc Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc JF20-2112 misc use of force misc political and legal justification misc countering terrorism misc internal armed conflict misc international humanitarian law misc other situations of violence misc Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| topic_browse |
misc JF20-2112 misc use of force misc political and legal justification misc countering terrorism misc internal armed conflict misc international humanitarian law misc other situations of violence misc Political institutions and public administration (General) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Управленческое консультирование |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760629421 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Управленческое консультирование |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760629421 |
| title |
Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ015603067 (DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa |
| title_full |
Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism |
| author_sort |
S. V. Korostelev |
| journal |
Управленческое консультирование |
| journalStr |
Управленческое консультирование |
| callnumber-first-code |
J |
| lang_code |
eng rus |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
16 |
| author_browse |
S. V. Korostelev |
| class |
JF20-2112 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
S. V. Korostelev |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 |
| title_sort |
features of the political and legal justification of the use of force in internal armed conflicts in countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism |
| callnumber |
JF20-2112 |
| title_auth |
Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism |
| abstract |
In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. |
| abstractGer |
In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811 https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139 https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760629421 |
| callnumber-subject |
JF - Public Administration |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26 |
| callnumber-a |
JF20-2112 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:57:54.707Z |
| _version_ |
1803574076720021504 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ015603067</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414200829.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ015603067</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JF20-2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. V. Korostelev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Features of the Political and Legal Justification of the Use of Force in Internal Armed Conflicts in Countering Terrorism and Other Violent Manifestations of Extremism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In any specific case of the use of armed violence, the question of its legitimation arises, that is, the need to justify the validity of an act of use of force in the language of the law. In general, the model of the legal regime for the use of force to counter terrorism and other manifestations of violent extremism converges to a search for a balance between norms applied, depending on the forces, means and methods of warfare used: the norms of International Humanitarian Law are to be applied to a greater extent when antigovernment groups maintain control of a part of territory of a state, International Human Rights Law — in the course of “law enforcement” actions, when antigovernment forces do not exercise such a control. The author describes the features of the political- legal rationale of the use of force in internal armed conflicts interrelated with countering terrorism and other violent manifestations of extremism:• there are important peculiarities that unify differing rules of law applicable to the international armed conflict, and applicable to internal armed conflict and other situations of violence;• there are sovereign restrictions on the application of international law in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• there are modern agreed restrictions on the use of means and methods of warfare in internal armed conflicts and other situations of violence;• as a result, joint regulations comprise a highly specific share of customary international law and a significant amount of «law enforcement» norms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">use of force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political and legal justification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">countering terrorism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">internal armed conflict</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international humanitarian law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">other situations of violence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Управленческое консультирование</subfield><subfield code="d">North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2018), 4, Seite 16-26</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760629421</subfield><subfield code="x">18168590</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-16-26</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f55de96511f34928af7e15b69dac7cfa</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/811</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">16-26</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399415 |