Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC
We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distri...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Dongsheng Li [verfasserIn] Fan Si [verfasserIn] Yidan Zhao [verfasserIn] Pengyu Zhou [verfasserIn] Yifei Zhang [verfasserIn] Xiujun Li [verfasserIn] Chengxi Yang [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Physics Letters B - Elsevier, 2015, 832(2022), Seite 137249- |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:832 ; year:2022 ; pages:137249- |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ017819792 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ017819792 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307033136.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ017819792 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QC1-999 | |
100 | 0 | |a Dongsheng Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Quark-gluon plasma | |
650 | 4 | |a Charm | |
650 | 4 | |a Beauty | |
650 | 4 | |a Semileptonic decay | |
650 | 4 | |a Nuclear modification factor | |
650 | 4 | |a Elliptic flow | |
653 | 0 | |a Physics | |
700 | 0 | |a Fan Si |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Yidan Zhao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Pengyu Zhou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Yifei Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Xiujun Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Chengxi Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Physics Letters B |d Elsevier, 2015 |g 832(2022), Seite 137249- |w (DE-627)266015360 |w (DE-600)1466612-1 |x 18732445 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:832 |g year:2022 |g pages:137249- |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 832 |j 2022 |h 137249- |
author_variant |
d l dl f s fs y z yz p z pz y z yz x l xl c y cy |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18732445:2022----::hradeuysltofohaylvreaeetosnpnppcl |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QC |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 doi (DE-627)DOAJ017819792 (DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Dongsheng Li verfasserin aut Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. Quark-gluon plasma Charm Beauty Semileptonic decay Nuclear modification factor Elliptic flow Physics Fan Si verfasserin aut Yidan Zhao verfasserin aut Pengyu Zhou verfasserin aut Yifei Zhang verfasserin aut Xiujun Li verfasserin aut Chengxi Yang verfasserin aut In Physics Letters B Elsevier, 2015 832(2022), Seite 137249- (DE-627)266015360 (DE-600)1466612-1 18732445 nnns volume:832 year:2022 pages:137249- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 832 2022 137249- |
spelling |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 doi (DE-627)DOAJ017819792 (DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Dongsheng Li verfasserin aut Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. Quark-gluon plasma Charm Beauty Semileptonic decay Nuclear modification factor Elliptic flow Physics Fan Si verfasserin aut Yidan Zhao verfasserin aut Pengyu Zhou verfasserin aut Yifei Zhang verfasserin aut Xiujun Li verfasserin aut Chengxi Yang verfasserin aut In Physics Letters B Elsevier, 2015 832(2022), Seite 137249- (DE-627)266015360 (DE-600)1466612-1 18732445 nnns volume:832 year:2022 pages:137249- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 832 2022 137249- |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 doi (DE-627)DOAJ017819792 (DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Dongsheng Li verfasserin aut Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. Quark-gluon plasma Charm Beauty Semileptonic decay Nuclear modification factor Elliptic flow Physics Fan Si verfasserin aut Yidan Zhao verfasserin aut Pengyu Zhou verfasserin aut Yifei Zhang verfasserin aut Xiujun Li verfasserin aut Chengxi Yang verfasserin aut In Physics Letters B Elsevier, 2015 832(2022), Seite 137249- (DE-627)266015360 (DE-600)1466612-1 18732445 nnns volume:832 year:2022 pages:137249- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 832 2022 137249- |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 doi (DE-627)DOAJ017819792 (DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Dongsheng Li verfasserin aut Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. Quark-gluon plasma Charm Beauty Semileptonic decay Nuclear modification factor Elliptic flow Physics Fan Si verfasserin aut Yidan Zhao verfasserin aut Pengyu Zhou verfasserin aut Yifei Zhang verfasserin aut Xiujun Li verfasserin aut Chengxi Yang verfasserin aut In Physics Letters B Elsevier, 2015 832(2022), Seite 137249- (DE-627)266015360 (DE-600)1466612-1 18732445 nnns volume:832 year:2022 pages:137249- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 832 2022 137249- |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 doi (DE-627)DOAJ017819792 (DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Dongsheng Li verfasserin aut Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. Quark-gluon plasma Charm Beauty Semileptonic decay Nuclear modification factor Elliptic flow Physics Fan Si verfasserin aut Yidan Zhao verfasserin aut Pengyu Zhou verfasserin aut Yifei Zhang verfasserin aut Xiujun Li verfasserin aut Chengxi Yang verfasserin aut In Physics Letters B Elsevier, 2015 832(2022), Seite 137249- (DE-627)266015360 (DE-600)1466612-1 18732445 nnns volume:832 year:2022 pages:137249- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 832 2022 137249- |
language |
English |
source |
In Physics Letters B 832(2022), Seite 137249- volume:832 year:2022 pages:137249- |
sourceStr |
In Physics Letters B 832(2022), Seite 137249- volume:832 year:2022 pages:137249- |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Quark-gluon plasma Charm Beauty Semileptonic decay Nuclear modification factor Elliptic flow Physics |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Physics Letters B |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Dongsheng Li @@aut@@ Fan Si @@aut@@ Yidan Zhao @@aut@@ Pengyu Zhou @@aut@@ Yifei Zhang @@aut@@ Xiujun Li @@aut@@ Chengxi Yang @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
266015360 |
id |
DOAJ017819792 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ017819792</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307033136.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ017819792</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QC1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dongsheng Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quark-gluon plasma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Charm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Beauty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semileptonic decay</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear modification factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elliptic flow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fan Si</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yidan Zhao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pengyu Zhou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yifei Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiujun Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chengxi Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Physics Letters B</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">832(2022), Seite 137249-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)266015360</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466612-1</subfield><subfield code="x">18732445</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:832</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:137249-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">832</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">137249-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Dongsheng Li |
spellingShingle |
Dongsheng Li misc QC1-999 misc Quark-gluon plasma misc Charm misc Beauty misc Semileptonic decay misc Nuclear modification factor misc Elliptic flow misc Physics Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC |
authorStr |
Dongsheng Li |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)266015360 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QC1-999 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
18732445 |
topic_title |
QC1-999 Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC Quark-gluon plasma Charm Beauty Semileptonic decay Nuclear modification factor Elliptic flow |
topic |
misc QC1-999 misc Quark-gluon plasma misc Charm misc Beauty misc Semileptonic decay misc Nuclear modification factor misc Elliptic flow misc Physics |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QC1-999 misc Quark-gluon plasma misc Charm misc Beauty misc Semileptonic decay misc Nuclear modification factor misc Elliptic flow misc Physics |
topic_browse |
misc QC1-999 misc Quark-gluon plasma misc Charm misc Beauty misc Semileptonic decay misc Nuclear modification factor misc Elliptic flow misc Physics |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Physics Letters B |
hierarchy_parent_id |
266015360 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Physics Letters B |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)266015360 (DE-600)1466612-1 |
title |
Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ017819792 (DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 |
title_full |
Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC |
author_sort |
Dongsheng Li |
journal |
Physics Letters B |
journalStr |
Physics Letters B |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
137249 |
author_browse |
Dongsheng Li Fan Si Yidan Zhao Pengyu Zhou Yifei Zhang Xiujun Li Chengxi Yang |
container_volume |
832 |
class |
QC1-999 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Dongsheng Li |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and pb+pb collisions at snn = 5.02 tev at lhc |
callnumber |
QC1-999 |
title_auth |
Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC |
abstract |
We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. |
abstractGer |
We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. |
abstract_unstemmed |
We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835 https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Fan Si Yidan Zhao Pengyu Zhou Yifei Zhang Xiujun Li Chengxi Yang |
author2Str |
Fan Si Yidan Zhao Pengyu Zhou Yifei Zhang Xiujun Li Chengxi Yang |
ppnlink |
266015360 |
callnumber-subject |
QC - Physics |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249 |
callnumber-a |
QC1-999 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:17:14.190Z |
_version_ |
1803567742785159168 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ017819792</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307033136.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ017819792</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QC1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dongsheng Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum pT spectra, nuclear modification factor RAA and azimuthal anisotropic flow v2 distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron RAA from charm (RAAc→e) and beauty (RAAb→e) decays are suppressed at pT<2.0 GeV/c in Pb+Pb collisions, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of RAAb→e than RAAc→e at 2.0<pT<8.0 GeV/c is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron v2 from beauty decays (v2b→e) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low pT from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/c, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with an 85% confidence level, which might be a possible hint of an energy-dependent behavior of beauty quarks reacting with the medium created in heavy-ion collisions. At 3.0<pT<7.0 GeV/c, v2b→e deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quark-gluon plasma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Charm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Beauty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semileptonic decay</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear modification factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elliptic flow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fan Si</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yidan Zhao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pengyu Zhou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yifei Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiujun Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chengxi Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Physics Letters B</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">832(2022), Seite 137249-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)266015360</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466612-1</subfield><subfield code="x">18732445</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:832</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:137249-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137249</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f5dabb42050f432fb014b6e5b4d0c755</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269322003835</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0370-2693</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">832</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">137249-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4005337 |