Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures
Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju [verfasserIn] Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde [verfasserIn] Juliana Obontu Taiwo [verfasserIn] Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal - Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022, 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:2017 ; number:3 ; pages:143-149 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ018357954 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ018357954 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310095859.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ018357954 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Clara Arianta Akinyamoju |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a acrylic denture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a flexible denture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a satisfaction | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a R | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Juliana Obontu Taiwo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal |d Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022 |g 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 |w (DE-627)DOAJ078594359 |x 24686875 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:143-149 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2017 |e 3 |h 143-149 | ||
| author_variant |
c a a caa t j o tjo j o t jot o o d ood |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24686875:2017----::oprsnfainstsatowtarlcnfei |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018357954 (DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Clara Arianta Akinyamoju verfasserin aut Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. acrylic denture flexible denture satisfaction Medicine R Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde verfasserin aut Juliana Obontu Taiwo verfasserin aut Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu verfasserin aut In Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 (DE-627)DOAJ078594359 24686875 nnns volume:24 year:2017 number:3 pages:143-149 https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c kostenfrei http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2017 3 143-149 |
| spelling |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018357954 (DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Clara Arianta Akinyamoju verfasserin aut Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. acrylic denture flexible denture satisfaction Medicine R Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde verfasserin aut Juliana Obontu Taiwo verfasserin aut Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu verfasserin aut In Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 (DE-627)DOAJ078594359 24686875 nnns volume:24 year:2017 number:3 pages:143-149 https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c kostenfrei http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2017 3 143-149 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018357954 (DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Clara Arianta Akinyamoju verfasserin aut Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. acrylic denture flexible denture satisfaction Medicine R Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde verfasserin aut Juliana Obontu Taiwo verfasserin aut Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu verfasserin aut In Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 (DE-627)DOAJ078594359 24686875 nnns volume:24 year:2017 number:3 pages:143-149 https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c kostenfrei http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2017 3 143-149 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018357954 (DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Clara Arianta Akinyamoju verfasserin aut Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. acrylic denture flexible denture satisfaction Medicine R Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde verfasserin aut Juliana Obontu Taiwo verfasserin aut Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu verfasserin aut In Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 (DE-627)DOAJ078594359 24686875 nnns volume:24 year:2017 number:3 pages:143-149 https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c kostenfrei http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2017 3 143-149 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018357954 (DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Clara Arianta Akinyamoju verfasserin aut Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. acrylic denture flexible denture satisfaction Medicine R Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde verfasserin aut Juliana Obontu Taiwo verfasserin aut Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu verfasserin aut In Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 (DE-627)DOAJ078594359 24686875 nnns volume:24 year:2017 number:3 pages:143-149 https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c kostenfrei http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2017 3 143-149 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 volume:24 year:2017 number:3 pages:143-149 |
| sourceStr |
In Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149 volume:24 year:2017 number:3 pages:143-149 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
acrylic denture flexible denture satisfaction Medicine R |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju @@aut@@ Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde @@aut@@ Juliana Obontu Taiwo @@aut@@ Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ078594359 |
| id |
DOAJ018357954 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ018357954</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310095859.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ018357954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clara Arianta Akinyamoju</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acrylic denture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flexible denture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">satisfaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juliana Obontu Taiwo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078594359</subfield><subfield code="x">24686875</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:143-149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">143-149</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju |
| spellingShingle |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju misc acrylic denture misc flexible denture misc satisfaction misc Medicine misc R Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures |
| authorStr |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ078594359 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24686875 |
| topic_title |
Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures acrylic denture flexible denture satisfaction |
| topic |
misc acrylic denture misc flexible denture misc satisfaction misc Medicine misc R |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc acrylic denture misc flexible denture misc satisfaction misc Medicine misc R |
| topic_browse |
misc acrylic denture misc flexible denture misc satisfaction misc Medicine misc R |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ078594359 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ078594359 |
| title |
Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ018357954 (DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c |
| title_full |
Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures |
| author_sort |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju |
| journal |
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal |
| journalStr |
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
143 |
| author_browse |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde Juliana Obontu Taiwo Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu |
| container_volume |
24 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Clara Arianta Akinyamoju |
| doi_str_mv |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures |
| title_auth |
Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures |
| abstract |
Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. |
| abstractGer |
Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936 https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde Juliana Obontu Taiwo Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu |
| author2Str |
Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde Juliana Obontu Taiwo Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ078594359 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:28:09.591Z |
| _version_ |
1803579754642669568 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ018357954</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310095859.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ018357954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clara Arianta Akinyamoju</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of patient satisfaction with acrylic and flexible partial dentures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose: Restoration of partial edentulous mouth may be done using a variety of treatment options. Removable partial denture (RPD) is commonly used because of its availability. RPDs from flexible resins unlike those from acrylic engage hard and soft tissue undercuts and feel more comfortable in the mouth. The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with dentures made from these two types of materials. Materials and Methods: It was a quasi-experimental study among thirty patients at the Prosthetics Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. Patients aged 16 years or more, requiring RPDs with one to three missing teeth in the anterior region of either the upper or lower arch participated. A modified semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics and oral health variables. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistics at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 51 years, mean age was 33.8 ± 10.01 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1 and mean duration of edentulousness was 11.37 ± 10.52 years (median - 9.50). Most 28 (93.3%) subjects delayed replacement of their missing teeth; reasons were indifference 13 (43.4%), financial constraint 10 (33.3%), ignorance 4 (13.3%) and fear of aspiration 1 (3.3%). Overall, 21 (70.0%) participants were more satisfied with the flexible dentures, 6 (20.0%) with acrylic dentures while 3 (10.0%) were equally satisfied with both types of dentures (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Subjects were more satisfied with the flexible RPD than the acrylic resin RPD.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acrylic denture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flexible denture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">satisfaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tunde Joshua Ogunrinde</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juliana Obontu Taiwo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oluwole Oyekunle Dosumu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2017), 3, Seite 143-149</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078594359</subfield><subfield code="x">24686875</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:143-149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/98a48d0f28a14eedbcec8c63f9d1900c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2017;volume=24;issue=3;spage=143;epage=149;aulast=Akinyamoju</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1117-1936</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2468-6875</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">143-149</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3988304 |