A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information
After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ying Zhang [verfasserIn] Matthew Roffey [verfasserIn] Sylvain G. Leblanc [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Remote Sensing - MDPI AG, 2009, 13(2021), 16, p 3297 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:13 ; year:2021 ; number:16, p 3297 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/rs13163297 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ018509193 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ018509193 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240412162615.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rs13163297 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ018509193 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Ying Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. | ||
650 | 4 | |a building damage detection | |
650 | 4 | |a shadow change | |
650 | 4 | |a urban earthquake disaster | |
650 | 4 | |a Pleiades image | |
650 | 4 | |a LiDAR-based DSM | |
650 | 4 | |a shadow simulation | |
653 | 0 | |a Science | |
653 | 0 | |a Q | |
700 | 0 | |a Matthew Roffey |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Sylvain G. Leblanc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Remote Sensing |d MDPI AG, 2009 |g 13(2021), 16, p 3297 |w (DE-627)608937916 |w (DE-600)2513863-7 |x 20724292 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2021 |g number:16, p 3297 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4392 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2021 |e 16, p 3297 |
author_variant |
y z yz m r mr s g l sgl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20724292:2021----::nvlrmwrfraidtcinfaaebidnssnpevnldraa |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.3390/rs13163297 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018509193 (DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Zhang verfasserin aut A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. building damage detection shadow change urban earthquake disaster Pleiades image LiDAR-based DSM shadow simulation Science Q Matthew Roffey verfasserin aut Sylvain G. Leblanc verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 16, p 3297 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:16, p 3297 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 16, p 3297 |
spelling |
10.3390/rs13163297 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018509193 (DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Zhang verfasserin aut A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. building damage detection shadow change urban earthquake disaster Pleiades image LiDAR-based DSM shadow simulation Science Q Matthew Roffey verfasserin aut Sylvain G. Leblanc verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 16, p 3297 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:16, p 3297 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 16, p 3297 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/rs13163297 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018509193 (DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Zhang verfasserin aut A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. building damage detection shadow change urban earthquake disaster Pleiades image LiDAR-based DSM shadow simulation Science Q Matthew Roffey verfasserin aut Sylvain G. Leblanc verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 16, p 3297 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:16, p 3297 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 16, p 3297 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/rs13163297 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018509193 (DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Zhang verfasserin aut A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. building damage detection shadow change urban earthquake disaster Pleiades image LiDAR-based DSM shadow simulation Science Q Matthew Roffey verfasserin aut Sylvain G. Leblanc verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 16, p 3297 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:16, p 3297 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 16, p 3297 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/rs13163297 doi (DE-627)DOAJ018509193 (DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Zhang verfasserin aut A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. building damage detection shadow change urban earthquake disaster Pleiades image LiDAR-based DSM shadow simulation Science Q Matthew Roffey verfasserin aut Sylvain G. Leblanc verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 16, p 3297 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:16, p 3297 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 16, p 3297 |
language |
English |
source |
In Remote Sensing 13(2021), 16, p 3297 volume:13 year:2021 number:16, p 3297 |
sourceStr |
In Remote Sensing 13(2021), 16, p 3297 volume:13 year:2021 number:16, p 3297 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
building damage detection shadow change urban earthquake disaster Pleiades image LiDAR-based DSM shadow simulation Science Q |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Remote Sensing |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ying Zhang @@aut@@ Matthew Roffey @@aut@@ Sylvain G. Leblanc @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
608937916 |
id |
DOAJ018509193 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ018509193</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412162615.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs13163297</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ018509193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">building damage detection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shadow change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban earthquake disaster</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pleiades image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LiDAR-based DSM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shadow simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matthew Roffey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sylvain G. Leblanc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2021), 16, p 3297</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:16, p 3297</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">16, p 3297</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Ying Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Ying Zhang misc building damage detection misc shadow change misc urban earthquake disaster misc Pleiades image misc LiDAR-based DSM misc shadow simulation misc Science misc Q A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information |
authorStr |
Ying Zhang |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)608937916 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20724292 |
topic_title |
A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information building damage detection shadow change urban earthquake disaster Pleiades image LiDAR-based DSM shadow simulation |
topic |
misc building damage detection misc shadow change misc urban earthquake disaster misc Pleiades image misc LiDAR-based DSM misc shadow simulation misc Science misc Q |
topic_unstemmed |
misc building damage detection misc shadow change misc urban earthquake disaster misc Pleiades image misc LiDAR-based DSM misc shadow simulation misc Science misc Q |
topic_browse |
misc building damage detection misc shadow change misc urban earthquake disaster misc Pleiades image misc LiDAR-based DSM misc shadow simulation misc Science misc Q |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Remote Sensing |
hierarchy_parent_id |
608937916 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Remote Sensing |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 |
title |
A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ018509193 (DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 |
title_full |
A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information |
author_sort |
Ying Zhang |
journal |
Remote Sensing |
journalStr |
Remote Sensing |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Ying Zhang Matthew Roffey Sylvain G. Leblanc |
container_volume |
13 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ying Zhang |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/rs13163297 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
novel framework for rapid detection of damaged buildings using pre-event lidar data and shadow change information |
title_auth |
A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information |
abstract |
After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. |
abstractGer |
After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. |
abstract_unstemmed |
After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
16, p 3297 |
title_short |
A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297 https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Matthew Roffey Sylvain G. Leblanc |
author2Str |
Matthew Roffey Sylvain G. Leblanc |
ppnlink |
608937916 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/rs13163297 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:19:05.396Z |
_version_ |
1803582958885404672 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ018509193</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412162615.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs13163297</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ018509193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Novel Framework for Rapid Detection of Damaged Buildings Using Pre-Event LiDAR Data and Shadow Change Information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">After a major earthquake in a dense urban area, the spatial distribution of heavily damaged buildings is indicative of the impact of the event on public safety. Timely assessment of the locations of severely damaged buildings and their damage morphologies using remote sensing approaches is critical for search and rescue actions. Detection of damaged buildings that did not suffer collapse can be highly challenging from aerial or satellite optical imagery, especially those structures with height-reduction or inclination damage and apparently intact roofs. A key information cue can be provided by a comparison of predicted building shadows based on pre-event building models with shadow estimates extracted from post-event imagery. This paper addresses the detection of damaged buildings in dense urban areas using the information of building shadow changes based on shadow simulation, analysis, and image processing in order to improve real-time damage detection and analysis. A novel processing framework for the rapid detection of damaged buildings without collapse is presented, which includes (a) generation of building digital surface models (DSMs) from pre-event LiDAR data, (b) building shadow detection and extraction from imagery, (c) simulation of predicted building shadows utilizing building DSMs, and (d) detection and identification of shadow areas exhibiting significant pre- and post-event differences that can be attributed to building damage. The framework is demonstrated through two simulated case studies. The building damage types considered are those typically observed in earthquake events and include height-reduction, over-turn collapse, and inclination. Total collapse cases are not addressed as these are comparatively easy to be detected using simpler algorithms. Key issues are discussed including the attributes of essential information layers and sources of error influencing the accuracy of building damage detection.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">building damage detection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shadow change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban earthquake disaster</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pleiades image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LiDAR-based DSM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shadow simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matthew Roffey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sylvain G. Leblanc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2021), 16, p 3297</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:16, p 3297</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163297</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cf79633708a748c4a1e00db4dd7025c9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3297</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">16, p 3297</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4020147 |