Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios

This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical pa...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	A.A. Andrianov [verfasserIn] I.S. Kuptsov [verfasserIn] T.V. Utyanskaya [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Schlagwörter:	Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Nuclear Energy and Technology - National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017, 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:2 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; pages:102-107

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ01901080X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ01901080X
003	DE-627
005	20230310103735.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TK9001-9401
100	0		\|a A.A. Andrianov \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.
650		4	\|a Energy planning
650		4	\|a Multi-objective optimization
650		4	\|a Nuclear energy system
650		4	\|a Nuclear fuel cycle
650		4	\|a Uncertainty
653		0	\|a Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
700	0		\|a I.S. Kuptsov \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a T.V. Utyanskaya \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Nuclear Energy and Technology \|d National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 \|g 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 \|w (DE-627)861082079 \|w (DE-600)2858592-6 \|x 24523038 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:2 \|g year:2016 \|g number:2 \|g pages:102-107
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 2 \|j 2016 \|e 2 \|h 102-107

Indexfelder

author_variant	a a aa i k ik t u tu
matchkey_str	article:24523038:2016----::plctoomlibetvadoutpiiainehdfrcmaaievlainfulae
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
callnumber-subject-code	TK
publishDate	2016
allfields	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107
spelling	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107
language	English
source	In Nuclear Energy and Technology 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107
sourceStr	In Nuclear Energy and Technology 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Nuclear Energy and Technology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	A.A. Andrianov @@aut@@ I.S. Kuptsov @@aut@@ T.V. Utyanskaya @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	861082079
id	DOAJ01901080X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ01901080X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310103735.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ01901080X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A.A. Andrianov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-objective optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear energy system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear fuel cycle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I.S. Kuptsov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.V. Utyanskaya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Energy and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)861082079</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2858592-6</subfield><subfield code="x">24523038</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:102-107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">102-107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	A.A. Andrianov
spellingShingle	A.A. Andrianov misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
authorStr	A.A. Andrianov
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)861082079
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TK9001-9401
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	24523038
topic_title	TK9001-9401 Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty
topic	misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
topic_unstemmed	misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
topic_browse	misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Nuclear Energy and Technology
hierarchy_parent_id	861082079
hierarchy_top_title	Nuclear Energy and Technology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6
title	Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca
title_full	Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
author_sort	A.A. Andrianov
journal	Nuclear Energy and Technology
journalStr	Nuclear Energy and Technology
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	102
author_browse	A.A. Andrianov I.S. Kuptsov T.V. Utyanskaya
container_volume	2
class	TK9001-9401
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	A.A. Andrianov
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
callnumber	TK9001-9401
title_auth	Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
abstract	This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.
abstractGer	This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.
abstract_unstemmed	This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038
remote_bool	true
author2	I.S. Kuptsov T.V. Utyanskaya
author2Str	I.S. Kuptsov T.V. Utyanskaya
ppnlink	861082079
callnumber-subject	TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006
callnumber-a	TK9001-9401
up_date	2024-07-03T21:18:29.303Z
_version_	1803594245659951104
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ01901080X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310103735.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ01901080X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A.A. Andrianov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-objective optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear energy system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear fuel cycle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I.S. Kuptsov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.V. Utyanskaya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Energy and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)861082079</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2858592-6</subfield><subfield code="x">24523038</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:102-107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">102-107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400429

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?