Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios
This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical pa...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
A.A. Andrianov [verfasserIn] I.S. Kuptsov [verfasserIn] T.V. Utyanskaya [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Nuclear Energy and Technology - National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017, 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:2 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; pages:102-107 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ01901080X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ01901080X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230310103735.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TK9001-9401 | |
100 | 0 | |a A.A. Andrianov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Energy planning | |
650 | 4 | |a Multi-objective optimization | |
650 | 4 | |a Nuclear energy system | |
650 | 4 | |a Nuclear fuel cycle | |
650 | 4 | |a Uncertainty | |
653 | 0 | |a Nuclear engineering. Atomic power | |
700 | 0 | |a I.S. Kuptsov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a T.V. Utyanskaya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Nuclear Energy and Technology |d National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 |g 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 |w (DE-627)861082079 |w (DE-600)2858592-6 |x 24523038 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:102-107 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 2 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 102-107 |
author_variant |
a a aa i k ik t u tu |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:24523038:2016----::plctoomlibetvadoutpiiainehdfrcmaaievlainfulae |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TK |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 A.A. Andrianov verfasserin aut Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power I.S. Kuptsov verfasserin aut T.V. Utyanskaya verfasserin aut In Nuclear Energy and Technology National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 (DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 24523038 nnns volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2 2016 2 102-107 |
language |
English |
source |
In Nuclear Energy and Technology 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 |
sourceStr |
In Nuclear Energy and Technology 2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107 volume:2 year:2016 number:2 pages:102-107 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Nuclear Energy and Technology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
A.A. Andrianov @@aut@@ I.S. Kuptsov @@aut@@ T.V. Utyanskaya @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
861082079 |
id |
DOAJ01901080X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ01901080X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310103735.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ01901080X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A.A. Andrianov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-objective optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear energy system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear fuel cycle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I.S. Kuptsov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.V. Utyanskaya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Energy and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)861082079</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2858592-6</subfield><subfield code="x">24523038</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:102-107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">102-107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
A.A. Andrianov |
spellingShingle |
A.A. Andrianov misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios |
authorStr |
A.A. Andrianov |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)861082079 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TK9001-9401 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
24523038 |
topic_title |
TK9001-9401 Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios Energy planning Multi-objective optimization Nuclear energy system Nuclear fuel cycle Uncertainty |
topic |
misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
topic_browse |
misc TK9001-9401 misc Energy planning misc Multi-objective optimization misc Nuclear energy system misc Nuclear fuel cycle misc Uncertainty misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Nuclear Energy and Technology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
861082079 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Nuclear Energy and Technology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)861082079 (DE-600)2858592-6 |
title |
Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ01901080X (DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca |
title_full |
Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios |
author_sort |
A.A. Andrianov |
journal |
Nuclear Energy and Technology |
journalStr |
Nuclear Energy and Technology |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
102 |
author_browse |
A.A. Andrianov I.S. Kuptsov T.V. Utyanskaya |
container_volume |
2 |
class |
TK9001-9401 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
A.A. Andrianov |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios |
callnumber |
TK9001-9401 |
title_auth |
Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios |
abstract |
This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. |
abstractGer |
This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425 https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
I.S. Kuptsov T.V. Utyanskaya |
author2Str |
I.S. Kuptsov T.V. Utyanskaya |
ppnlink |
861082079 |
callnumber-subject |
TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006 |
callnumber-a |
TK9001-9401 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:18:29.303Z |
_version_ |
1803594245659951104 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ01901080X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310103735.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ01901080X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJfd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A.A. Andrianov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of multi-objective and robust optimization methods for a comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system deployment scenarios</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article describes additional computational modules developed for the IAEA energy planning software MESSAGE. These modules are intended for multi-objective and robust optimization of deployment scenarios for nuclear energy systems with account for the uncertainties in technical and economical parameters. The authors present the results of application of the developed modules for the studies on multi-objective optimization of the nuclear energy structures. The developed set of computational modules makes it possible to find a compromise between conflicting system factors determining the nuclear energy development, carry out a comparative multi-criteria analysis of development options with due account for their evolution, specific features of the nuclear fuel cycle structure and organization as well as the most important system constraints. Application of the multi-objective and robust optimization methods together with statistical methods for uncertainty assessment may help formulate more substantiated judgments about the attractiveness of possible nuclear energy structures by comparing various development options. These IAEA based software tools make it possible to determine nuclear energy development strategy options due to a combination of conflicting systemic factors taking into account uncertainties in the main technical and economical parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-objective optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear energy system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear fuel cycle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I.S. Kuptsov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.V. Utyanskaya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Energy and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2016), 2, Seite 102-107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)861082079</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2858592-6</subfield><subfield code="x">24523038</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:102-107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.05.006</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/fd1d882db631458dbcd051db1b8a5fca</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303816300425</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2452-3038</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">102-107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400429 |