Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization
In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, wit...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Veronika Temml [verfasserIn] Zsofia Kutil [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal - Elsevier, 2013, 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:19 ; year:2021 ; pages:1431-1444 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ019083874 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ019083874 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230310104353.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ019083874 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TP248.13-248.65 | |
100 | 0 | |a Veronika Temml |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Docking | |
650 | 4 | |a Pharmacophore modeling | |
650 | 4 | |a Lead optimization | |
650 | 4 | |a Structure-activity relationship | |
650 | 4 | |a Molecular modeling | |
653 | 0 | |a Biotechnology | |
700 | 0 | |a Zsofia Kutil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |d Elsevier, 2013 |g 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 |w (DE-627)731890086 |w (DE-600)2694435-2 |x 20010370 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2021 |g pages:1431-1444 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 19 |j 2021 |h 1431-1444 |
author_variant |
v t vt z k zk |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20010370:2021----::tutrbsdoeuamdlnisrnlss |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TP |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019083874 (DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Veronika Temml verfasserin aut Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. Docking Pharmacophore modeling Lead optimization Structure-activity relationship Molecular modeling Biotechnology Zsofia Kutil verfasserin aut In Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal Elsevier, 2013 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 (DE-627)731890086 (DE-600)2694435-2 20010370 nnns volume:19 year:2021 pages:1431-1444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2021 1431-1444 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019083874 (DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Veronika Temml verfasserin aut Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. Docking Pharmacophore modeling Lead optimization Structure-activity relationship Molecular modeling Biotechnology Zsofia Kutil verfasserin aut In Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal Elsevier, 2013 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 (DE-627)731890086 (DE-600)2694435-2 20010370 nnns volume:19 year:2021 pages:1431-1444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2021 1431-1444 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019083874 (DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Veronika Temml verfasserin aut Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. Docking Pharmacophore modeling Lead optimization Structure-activity relationship Molecular modeling Biotechnology Zsofia Kutil verfasserin aut In Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal Elsevier, 2013 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 (DE-627)731890086 (DE-600)2694435-2 20010370 nnns volume:19 year:2021 pages:1431-1444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2021 1431-1444 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019083874 (DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Veronika Temml verfasserin aut Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. Docking Pharmacophore modeling Lead optimization Structure-activity relationship Molecular modeling Biotechnology Zsofia Kutil verfasserin aut In Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal Elsevier, 2013 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 (DE-627)731890086 (DE-600)2694435-2 20010370 nnns volume:19 year:2021 pages:1431-1444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2021 1431-1444 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019083874 (DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Veronika Temml verfasserin aut Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. Docking Pharmacophore modeling Lead optimization Structure-activity relationship Molecular modeling Biotechnology Zsofia Kutil verfasserin aut In Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal Elsevier, 2013 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 (DE-627)731890086 (DE-600)2694435-2 20010370 nnns volume:19 year:2021 pages:1431-1444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2021 1431-1444 |
language |
English |
source |
In Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 volume:19 year:2021 pages:1431-1444 |
sourceStr |
In Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19(2021), Seite 1431-1444 volume:19 year:2021 pages:1431-1444 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Docking Pharmacophore modeling Lead optimization Structure-activity relationship Molecular modeling Biotechnology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Veronika Temml @@aut@@ Zsofia Kutil @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
731890086 |
id |
DOAJ019083874 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019083874</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310104353.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019083874</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP248.13-248.65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Veronika Temml</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Docking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pharmacophore modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lead optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structure-activity relationship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Molecular modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsofia Kutil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2021), Seite 1431-1444</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)731890086</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2694435-2</subfield><subfield code="x">20010370</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1431-1444</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">1431-1444</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Veronika Temml |
spellingShingle |
Veronika Temml misc TP248.13-248.65 misc Docking misc Pharmacophore modeling misc Lead optimization misc Structure-activity relationship misc Molecular modeling misc Biotechnology Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization |
authorStr |
Veronika Temml |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)731890086 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TP248 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20010370 |
topic_title |
TP248.13-248.65 Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization Docking Pharmacophore modeling Lead optimization Structure-activity relationship Molecular modeling |
topic |
misc TP248.13-248.65 misc Docking misc Pharmacophore modeling misc Lead optimization misc Structure-activity relationship misc Molecular modeling misc Biotechnology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TP248.13-248.65 misc Docking misc Pharmacophore modeling misc Lead optimization misc Structure-activity relationship misc Molecular modeling misc Biotechnology |
topic_browse |
misc TP248.13-248.65 misc Docking misc Pharmacophore modeling misc Lead optimization misc Structure-activity relationship misc Molecular modeling misc Biotechnology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |
hierarchy_parent_id |
731890086 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)731890086 (DE-600)2694435-2 |
title |
Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ019083874 (DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c |
title_full |
Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization |
author_sort |
Veronika Temml |
journal |
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |
journalStr |
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1431 |
author_browse |
Veronika Temml Zsofia Kutil |
container_volume |
19 |
class |
TP248.13-248.65 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Veronika Temml |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
structure-based molecular modeling in sar analysis and lead optimization |
callnumber |
TP248.13-248.65 |
title_auth |
Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization |
abstract |
In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. |
abstractGer |
In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. |
abstract_unstemmed |
In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696 https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Zsofia Kutil |
author2Str |
Zsofia Kutil |
ppnlink |
731890086 |
callnumber-subject |
TP - Chemical Technology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018 |
callnumber-a |
TP248.13-248.65 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:41:45.306Z |
_version_ |
1803595709476241408 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019083874</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310104353.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019083874</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP248.13-248.65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Veronika Temml</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Structure-based molecular modeling in SAR analysis and lead optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In silico methods like molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling are established strategies in lead identification. Their successful application for finding new active molecules for a target is reported by a plethora of studies. However, once a potential lead is identified, lead optimization, with the focus on improving potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic parameters of a parent compound, is a much more complex task. Even though in silico molecular modeling methods could contribute a lot of time and cost-saving by rationally filtering synthetic optimization options, they are employed less widely in this stage of research. In this review, we highlight studies that have successfully used computer-aided SAR analysis in lead optimization and want to showcase sound methodology and easily accessible in silico tools for this purpose.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Docking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pharmacophore modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lead optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structure-activity relationship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Molecular modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsofia Kutil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2021), Seite 1431-1444</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)731890086</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2694435-2</subfield><subfield code="x">20010370</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1431-1444</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.018</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/346555cb4758458f84fa0a4695b3e93c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000696</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2001-0370</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">1431-1444</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401971 |