Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein

Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applica...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Juliane F. Ripka [verfasserIn] Albert Perez-Riba [verfasserIn] Piyush K. Chaturbedy [verfasserIn] Laura S. Itzhaki [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Current Research in Structural Biology - Elsevier, 2020, 3(2021), Seite 30-40
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:3 ; year:2021 ; pages:30-40

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ019595670

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ019595670
003	DE-627
005	20230503005425.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ019595670
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QH301-705.5
100	0		\|a Juliane F. Ripka \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.
650		4	\|a Tandem-repeat protein
650		4	\|a Tetratricopeptide repeat
650		4	\|a Peptide grafting
650		4	\|a Intrinsically disordered protein
650		4	\|a Intrinsically disordered region
653		0	\|a Biology (General)
700	0		\|a Albert Perez-Riba \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Piyush K. Chaturbedy \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Laura S. Itzhaki \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Current Research in Structural Biology \|d Elsevier, 2020 \|g 3(2021), Seite 30-40 \|w (DE-627)1681860821 \|x 2665928X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:3 \|g year:2021 \|g pages:30-40
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 3 \|j 2021 \|h 30-40

Indexfelder

author_variant	j f r jfr a p r apr p k c pkc l s i lsi
matchkey_str	article:2665928X:2021----::etnteeghiiologatniaei
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
callnumber-subject-code	QH
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40
spelling	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40
language	English
source	In Current Research in Structural Biology 3(2021), Seite 30-40 volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40
sourceStr	In Current Research in Structural Biology 3(2021), Seite 30-40 volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Current Research in Structural Biology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Juliane F. Ripka @@aut@@ Albert Perez-Riba @@aut@@ Piyush K. Chaturbedy @@aut@@ Laura S. Itzhaki @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1681860821
id	DOAJ019595670
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019595670</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503005425.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019595670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juliane F. Ripka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tandem-repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tetratricopeptide repeat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peptide grafting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered region</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Albert Perez-Riba</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piyush K. Chaturbedy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura S. Itzhaki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Current Research in Structural Biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2021), Seite 30-40</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1681860821</subfield><subfield code="x">2665928X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:30-40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">30-40</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Juliane F. Ripka
spellingShingle	Juliane F. Ripka misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General) Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
authorStr	Juliane F. Ripka
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1681860821
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QH301-705
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2665928X
topic_title	QH301-705.5 Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region
topic	misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General)
topic_browse	misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Current Research in Structural Biology
hierarchy_parent_id	1681860821
hierarchy_top_title	Current Research in Structural Biology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1681860821
title	Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58
title_full	Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
author_sort	Juliane F. Ripka
journal	Current Research in Structural Biology
journalStr	Current Research in Structural Biology
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	30
author_browse	Juliane F. Ripka Albert Perez-Riba Piyush K. Chaturbedy Laura S. Itzhaki
container_volume	3
class	QH301-705.5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Juliane F. Ripka
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
callnumber	QH301-705.5
title_auth	Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
abstract	Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.
abstractGer	Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.
abstract_unstemmed	Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X
remote_bool	true
author2	Albert Perez-Riba Piyush K. Chaturbedy Laura S. Itzhaki
author2Str	Albert Perez-Riba Piyush K. Chaturbedy Laura S. Itzhaki
ppnlink	1681860821
callnumber-subject	QH - Natural History and Biology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002
callnumber-a	QH301-705.5
up_date	2024-07-04T00:11:39.944Z
_version_	1803605141037776897
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019595670</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503005425.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019595670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juliane F. Ripka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tandem-repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tetratricopeptide repeat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peptide grafting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered region</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Albert Perez-Riba</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piyush K. Chaturbedy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura S. Itzhaki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Current Research in Structural Biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2021), Seite 30-40</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1681860821</subfield><subfield code="x">2665928X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:30-40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">30-40</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4010878

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?