Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein
Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applica...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Juliane F. Ripka [verfasserIn] Albert Perez-Riba [verfasserIn] Piyush K. Chaturbedy [verfasserIn] Laura S. Itzhaki [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Current Research in Structural Biology - Elsevier, 2020, 3(2021), Seite 30-40 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2021 ; pages:30-40 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ019595670 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ019595670 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503005425.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QH301-705.5 | |
100 | 0 | |a Juliane F. Ripka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Tandem-repeat protein | |
650 | 4 | |a Tetratricopeptide repeat | |
650 | 4 | |a Peptide grafting | |
650 | 4 | |a Intrinsically disordered protein | |
650 | 4 | |a Intrinsically disordered region | |
653 | 0 | |a Biology (General) | |
700 | 0 | |a Albert Perez-Riba |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Piyush K. Chaturbedy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Laura S. Itzhaki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Current Research in Structural Biology |d Elsevier, 2020 |g 3(2021), Seite 30-40 |w (DE-627)1681860821 |x 2665928X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2021 |g pages:30-40 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 3 |j 2021 |h 30-40 |
author_variant |
j f r jfr a p r apr p k c pkc l s i lsi |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:2665928X:2021----::etnteeghiiologatniaei |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QH |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH301-705.5 Juliane F. Ripka verfasserin aut Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) Albert Perez-Riba verfasserin aut Piyush K. Chaturbedy verfasserin aut Laura S. Itzhaki verfasserin aut In Current Research in Structural Biology Elsevier, 2020 3(2021), Seite 30-40 (DE-627)1681860821 2665928X nnns volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2021 30-40 |
language |
English |
source |
In Current Research in Structural Biology 3(2021), Seite 30-40 volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 |
sourceStr |
In Current Research in Structural Biology 3(2021), Seite 30-40 volume:3 year:2021 pages:30-40 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region Biology (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Current Research in Structural Biology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Juliane F. Ripka @@aut@@ Albert Perez-Riba @@aut@@ Piyush K. Chaturbedy @@aut@@ Laura S. Itzhaki @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1681860821 |
id |
DOAJ019595670 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019595670</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503005425.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019595670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juliane F. Ripka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tandem-repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tetratricopeptide repeat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peptide grafting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered region</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Albert Perez-Riba</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piyush K. Chaturbedy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura S. Itzhaki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Current Research in Structural Biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2021), Seite 30-40</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1681860821</subfield><subfield code="x">2665928X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:30-40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">30-40</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Juliane F. Ripka |
spellingShingle |
Juliane F. Ripka misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General) Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein |
authorStr |
Juliane F. Ripka |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1681860821 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QH301-705 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2665928X |
topic_title |
QH301-705.5 Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein Tandem-repeat protein Tetratricopeptide repeat Peptide grafting Intrinsically disordered protein Intrinsically disordered region |
topic |
misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General) |
topic_browse |
misc QH301-705.5 misc Tandem-repeat protein misc Tetratricopeptide repeat misc Peptide grafting misc Intrinsically disordered protein misc Intrinsically disordered region misc Biology (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Current Research in Structural Biology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1681860821 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Current Research in Structural Biology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1681860821 |
title |
Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ019595670 (DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 |
title_full |
Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein |
author_sort |
Juliane F. Ripka |
journal |
Current Research in Structural Biology |
journalStr |
Current Research in Structural Biology |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
30 |
author_browse |
Juliane F. Ripka Albert Perez-Riba Piyush K. Chaturbedy Laura S. Itzhaki |
container_volume |
3 |
class |
QH301-705.5 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Juliane F. Ripka |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein |
callnumber |
QH301-705.5 |
title_auth |
Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein |
abstract |
Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. |
abstractGer |
Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Albert Perez-Riba Piyush K. Chaturbedy Laura S. Itzhaki |
author2Str |
Albert Perez-Riba Piyush K. Chaturbedy Laura S. Itzhaki |
ppnlink |
1681860821 |
callnumber-subject |
QH - Natural History and Biology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002 |
callnumber-a |
QH301-705.5 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:11:39.944Z |
_version_ |
1803605141037776897 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019595670</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503005425.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019595670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juliane F. Ripka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alpha-helical repeat proteins such as consensus-designed tetratricopeptide repeats (CTPRs) are exceptionally stable molecules that are able to tolerate destabilizing sequence alterations and are therefore becoming increasingly valued as a modular platform for biotechnology and biotherapeutic applications. A simple approach to functionalize the CTPR scaffold that we are pioneering is the insertion of short linear motifs (SLiMs) into the loops between adjacent repeats. Here, we test the limits of the scaffold by inserting 17 highly diverse amino acid sequences of up to 58 amino acids in length into a two-repeat protein and examine the impact on protein folding, stability and solubility. The sequences include three SLiMs that bind oncoproteins and eleven naturally occurring linker sequences all predicted to be intrinsically disordered but with conformational preferences ranging from compact globules to expanded coils. We show that the loop-grafted proteins retain the native CTPR structure and are thermally stable with melting temperatures above 60 °C, despite the longest loop sequence being almost the same size as the CTPR scaffold itself (68 amino acids). Although the main determinant of the effect of stability was found to be loop length and was relatively insensitive to amino acid composition, the relationship between protein solubility and the loop sequences was more complex, with the presence of negatively charged amino acids enhancing the solubility. Our findings will help us to fully realize the potential of the repeat-protein scaffold, allowing a rational design approach to create artificial modular proteins with customized functional capabilities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tandem-repeat protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tetratricopeptide repeat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peptide grafting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered protein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intrinsically disordered region</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Albert Perez-Riba</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piyush K. Chaturbedy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura S. Itzhaki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Current Research in Structural Biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2021), Seite 30-40</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1681860821</subfield><subfield code="x">2665928X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:30-40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.002</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7d5557d63df34de3ae03be98c2561f58</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665928X2030026X</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2665-928X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">30-40</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4010878 |