Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM

Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Xuezhi Wang [verfasserIn] Wenhui Li [verfasserIn] Qingliang Li [verfasserIn] Xiaoning Li [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience - Hindawi Limited, 2007, (2022)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2022

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1155/2022/9016823

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ019605854

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ019605854
003	DE-627
005	20230226055959.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1155/2022/9016823 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ019605854
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a R858-859.7
050		0	\|a RC321-571
100	0		\|a Xuezhi Wang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days.
653		0	\|a Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
653		0	\|a Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
700	0		\|a Wenhui Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Qingliang Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xiaoning Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience \|d Hindawi Limited, 2007 \|g (2022) \|w (DE-627)545783720 \|w (DE-600)2388208-6 \|x 16875265 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2022
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_165
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_636
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2022

Indexfelder

author_variant	x w xw w l wl q l ql x l xl
matchkey_str	article:16875265:2022----::oeigoleprtrfrifrndyuigoeqar
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	R
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1155/2022/9016823 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019605854 (DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R858-859.7 RC321-571 Xuezhi Wang verfasserin aut Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days. Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Wenhui Li verfasserin aut Qingliang Li verfasserin aut Xiaoning Li verfasserin aut In Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience Hindawi Limited, 2007 (2022) (DE-627)545783720 (DE-600)2388208-6 16875265 nnns year:2022 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022
spelling	10.1155/2022/9016823 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019605854 (DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R858-859.7 RC321-571 Xuezhi Wang verfasserin aut Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days. Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Wenhui Li verfasserin aut Qingliang Li verfasserin aut Xiaoning Li verfasserin aut In Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience Hindawi Limited, 2007 (2022) (DE-627)545783720 (DE-600)2388208-6 16875265 nnns year:2022 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022
allfields_unstemmed	10.1155/2022/9016823 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019605854 (DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R858-859.7 RC321-571 Xuezhi Wang verfasserin aut Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days. Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Wenhui Li verfasserin aut Qingliang Li verfasserin aut Xiaoning Li verfasserin aut In Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience Hindawi Limited, 2007 (2022) (DE-627)545783720 (DE-600)2388208-6 16875265 nnns year:2022 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022
allfieldsGer	10.1155/2022/9016823 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019605854 (DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R858-859.7 RC321-571 Xuezhi Wang verfasserin aut Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days. Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Wenhui Li verfasserin aut Qingliang Li verfasserin aut Xiaoning Li verfasserin aut In Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience Hindawi Limited, 2007 (2022) (DE-627)545783720 (DE-600)2388208-6 16875265 nnns year:2022 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022
allfieldsSound	10.1155/2022/9016823 doi (DE-627)DOAJ019605854 (DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R858-859.7 RC321-571 Xuezhi Wang verfasserin aut Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days. Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Wenhui Li verfasserin aut Qingliang Li verfasserin aut Xiaoning Li verfasserin aut In Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience Hindawi Limited, 2007 (2022) (DE-627)545783720 (DE-600)2388208-6 16875265 nnns year:2022 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022
language	English
source	In Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (2022) year:2022
sourceStr	In Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (2022) year:2022
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Xuezhi Wang @@aut@@ Wenhui Li @@aut@@ Qingliang Li @@aut@@ Xiaoning Li @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	545783720
id	DOAJ019605854
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019605854</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230226055959.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1155/2022/9016823</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019605854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R858-859.7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC321-571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xuezhi Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenhui Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qingliang Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoning Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience</subfield><subfield code="d">Hindawi Limited, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)545783720</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2388208-6</subfield><subfield code="x">16875265</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Xuezhi Wang
spellingShingle	Xuezhi Wang misc R858-859.7 misc RC321-571 misc Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM
authorStr	Xuezhi Wang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)545783720
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	R858-859
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16875265
topic_title	R858-859.7 RC321-571 Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM
topic	misc R858-859.7 misc RC321-571 misc Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
topic_unstemmed	misc R858-859.7 misc RC321-571 misc Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
topic_browse	misc R858-859.7 misc RC321-571 misc Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
hierarchy_parent_id	545783720
hierarchy_top_title	Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)545783720 (DE-600)2388208-6
title	Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ019605854 (DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942
title_full	Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM
author_sort	Xuezhi Wang
journal	Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
journalStr	Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Xuezhi Wang Wenhui Li Qingliang Li Xiaoning Li
class	R858-859.7 RC321-571
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Xuezhi Wang
doi_str_mv	10.1155/2022/9016823
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	modeling soil temperature for different days using novel quadruplet loss-guided lstm
callnumber	R858-859.7
title_auth	Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM
abstract	Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days.
abstractGer	Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days.
abstract_unstemmed	Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM
url	https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823 https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273
remote_bool	true
author2	Wenhui Li Qingliang Li Xiaoning Li
author2Str	Wenhui Li Qingliang Li Xiaoning Li
ppnlink	545783720
callnumber-subject	R - General Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1155/2022/9016823
callnumber-a	R858-859.7
up_date	2024-07-04T00:14:14.968Z
_version_	1803605303592222720
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ019605854</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230226055959.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1155/2022/9016823</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ019605854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R858-859.7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC321-571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xuezhi Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soil temperature (Ts), a key variable in geosciences study, has generated growing interest among researchers. There are many factors affecting the spatiotemporal variation of Ts, which poses immense challenges for the Ts estimation. To enrich processing information on loss function and achieve better performance in estimation, the paper designed a new long short-term memory model using quadruplet loss function as an intelligence tool for data processing (QL-LSTM). The model in this paper combined the traditional squared-error loss function with distance metric learning between the sample features. It can zoom analyze the samples accurately to optimize the estimation accuracy. We applied the meteorological data from Laegern and Fluehli stations at 5, 10, and 15 cm depth on the 1st, 5th, and 15th day separately to verify the performance of the proposed soil temperature estimation model. Meanwhile, this paper inputs the variables into the proposed model including radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed, air pressure, and past Ts data. The performance of the model was tested by several error evaluation indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), Willmott Index of Agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe index (LMI). As the test results at different soil depths show, our model generally outperformed the four existing advanced estimation models, namely, backpropagation neural networks, extreme learning machines, support vector regression, and LSTM. Furthermore, as experiments show, the proposed model achieved the best performance at the 15 cm depth of soil on the 1st day at Laegern station, which achieved higher WI (0.998), NS (0.995), and LMI (0.938) values, and got lower RMSE (0.312) and MAE (0.239) values. Consequently, the QL-LSTM model is recommended to estimate daily Ts profiles estimation on the 1st, 5th, and 15th days.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenhui Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qingliang Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoning Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience</subfield><subfield code="d">Hindawi Limited, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)545783720</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2388208-6</subfield><subfield code="x">16875265</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/199ae53702204a868c4f6801848a9942</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9016823</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3999033

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Modeling Soil Temperature for Different Days Using Novel Quadruplet Loss-Guided LSTM

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?