Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress
Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Salma Mukhtar [verfasserIn] Ann M. Hirsch [verfasserIn] Noor Khan [verfasserIn] Kauser A. Malik [verfasserIn] Ethan A. Humm [verfasserIn] Matteo Pellegrini [verfasserIn] Baochen Shi [verfasserIn] Leah Briscoe [verfasserIn] Marcel Huntemann [verfasserIn] Alicia Clum [verfasserIn] Brian Foster [verfasserIn] Bryce Foster [verfasserIn] Simon Roux [verfasserIn] Krishnaveni Palaniappan [verfasserIn] Neha Varghese [verfasserIn] Supratim Mukherjee [verfasserIn] T.B.K. Reddy [verfasserIn] Chris Daum [verfasserIn] Alex Copeland [verfasserIn] Natalia N. Ivanova [verfasserIn] Nikos C. Kyrpides [verfasserIn] Nicole Shapiro [verfasserIn] Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh [verfasserIn] Maskit Maymon [verfasserIn] Muhammad S. Mirza [verfasserIn] Samina Mehnaz [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Phytobiomes Journal - The American Phytopathological Society, 2018, 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:2020 ; number:4 ; pages:364-374 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ020060149 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ020060149 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310114110.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ020060149 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a SB1-1110 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a QR100-130 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a QK900-989 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Salma Mukhtar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a Plant culture | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Microbial ecology | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Plant ecology | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ann M. Hirsch |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Noor Khan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Kauser A. Malik |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ethan A. Humm |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Matteo Pellegrini |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Baochen Shi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Leah Briscoe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Marcel Huntemann |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Alicia Clum |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Brian Foster |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Bryce Foster |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Simon Roux |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Krishnaveni Palaniappan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Neha Varghese |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Supratim Mukherjee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a T.B.K. Reddy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Chris Daum |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Alex Copeland |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Natalia N. Ivanova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Nikos C. Kyrpides |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Nicole Shapiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Maskit Maymon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Muhammad S. Mirza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Samina Mehnaz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Phytobiomes Journal |d The American Phytopathological Society, 2018 |g 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 |w (DE-627)890367132 |w (DE-600)2897163-2 |x 24712906 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g pages:364-374 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 2020 |e 4 |h 364-374 | ||
| author_variant |
s m sm a m h amh n k nk k a m kam e a h eah m p mp b s bs l b lb m h mh a c ac b f bf b f bf s r sr k p kp n v nv s m sm t r tr c d cd a c ac n n i nni n c k nck n s ns e a e f eaef m m mm m s m msm s m sm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24712906:2020----::matfolaiiynhcwendlmcoimadhioainfaooeatgrtantpo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
SB |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R doi (DE-627)DOAJ020060149 (DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 QR100-130 QK900-989 Salma Mukhtar verfasserin aut Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. Plant culture Microbial ecology Plant ecology Ann M. Hirsch verfasserin aut Noor Khan verfasserin aut Kauser A. Malik verfasserin aut Ethan A. Humm verfasserin aut Matteo Pellegrini verfasserin aut Baochen Shi verfasserin aut Leah Briscoe verfasserin aut Marcel Huntemann verfasserin aut Alicia Clum verfasserin aut Brian Foster verfasserin aut Bryce Foster verfasserin aut Simon Roux verfasserin aut Krishnaveni Palaniappan verfasserin aut Neha Varghese verfasserin aut Supratim Mukherjee verfasserin aut T.B.K. Reddy verfasserin aut Chris Daum verfasserin aut Alex Copeland verfasserin aut Natalia N. Ivanova verfasserin aut Nikos C. Kyrpides verfasserin aut Nicole Shapiro verfasserin aut Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh verfasserin aut Maskit Maymon verfasserin aut Muhammad S. Mirza verfasserin aut Samina Mehnaz verfasserin aut In Phytobiomes Journal The American Phytopathological Society, 2018 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 (DE-627)890367132 (DE-600)2897163-2 24712906 nnns volume:4 year:2020 number:4 pages:364-374 https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2020 4 364-374 |
| spelling |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R doi (DE-627)DOAJ020060149 (DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 QR100-130 QK900-989 Salma Mukhtar verfasserin aut Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. Plant culture Microbial ecology Plant ecology Ann M. Hirsch verfasserin aut Noor Khan verfasserin aut Kauser A. Malik verfasserin aut Ethan A. Humm verfasserin aut Matteo Pellegrini verfasserin aut Baochen Shi verfasserin aut Leah Briscoe verfasserin aut Marcel Huntemann verfasserin aut Alicia Clum verfasserin aut Brian Foster verfasserin aut Bryce Foster verfasserin aut Simon Roux verfasserin aut Krishnaveni Palaniappan verfasserin aut Neha Varghese verfasserin aut Supratim Mukherjee verfasserin aut T.B.K. Reddy verfasserin aut Chris Daum verfasserin aut Alex Copeland verfasserin aut Natalia N. Ivanova verfasserin aut Nikos C. Kyrpides verfasserin aut Nicole Shapiro verfasserin aut Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh verfasserin aut Maskit Maymon verfasserin aut Muhammad S. Mirza verfasserin aut Samina Mehnaz verfasserin aut In Phytobiomes Journal The American Phytopathological Society, 2018 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 (DE-627)890367132 (DE-600)2897163-2 24712906 nnns volume:4 year:2020 number:4 pages:364-374 https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2020 4 364-374 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R doi (DE-627)DOAJ020060149 (DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 QR100-130 QK900-989 Salma Mukhtar verfasserin aut Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. Plant culture Microbial ecology Plant ecology Ann M. Hirsch verfasserin aut Noor Khan verfasserin aut Kauser A. Malik verfasserin aut Ethan A. Humm verfasserin aut Matteo Pellegrini verfasserin aut Baochen Shi verfasserin aut Leah Briscoe verfasserin aut Marcel Huntemann verfasserin aut Alicia Clum verfasserin aut Brian Foster verfasserin aut Bryce Foster verfasserin aut Simon Roux verfasserin aut Krishnaveni Palaniappan verfasserin aut Neha Varghese verfasserin aut Supratim Mukherjee verfasserin aut T.B.K. Reddy verfasserin aut Chris Daum verfasserin aut Alex Copeland verfasserin aut Natalia N. Ivanova verfasserin aut Nikos C. Kyrpides verfasserin aut Nicole Shapiro verfasserin aut Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh verfasserin aut Maskit Maymon verfasserin aut Muhammad S. Mirza verfasserin aut Samina Mehnaz verfasserin aut In Phytobiomes Journal The American Phytopathological Society, 2018 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 (DE-627)890367132 (DE-600)2897163-2 24712906 nnns volume:4 year:2020 number:4 pages:364-374 https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2020 4 364-374 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R doi (DE-627)DOAJ020060149 (DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 QR100-130 QK900-989 Salma Mukhtar verfasserin aut Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. Plant culture Microbial ecology Plant ecology Ann M. Hirsch verfasserin aut Noor Khan verfasserin aut Kauser A. Malik verfasserin aut Ethan A. Humm verfasserin aut Matteo Pellegrini verfasserin aut Baochen Shi verfasserin aut Leah Briscoe verfasserin aut Marcel Huntemann verfasserin aut Alicia Clum verfasserin aut Brian Foster verfasserin aut Bryce Foster verfasserin aut Simon Roux verfasserin aut Krishnaveni Palaniappan verfasserin aut Neha Varghese verfasserin aut Supratim Mukherjee verfasserin aut T.B.K. Reddy verfasserin aut Chris Daum verfasserin aut Alex Copeland verfasserin aut Natalia N. Ivanova verfasserin aut Nikos C. Kyrpides verfasserin aut Nicole Shapiro verfasserin aut Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh verfasserin aut Maskit Maymon verfasserin aut Muhammad S. Mirza verfasserin aut Samina Mehnaz verfasserin aut In Phytobiomes Journal The American Phytopathological Society, 2018 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 (DE-627)890367132 (DE-600)2897163-2 24712906 nnns volume:4 year:2020 number:4 pages:364-374 https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2020 4 364-374 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R doi (DE-627)DOAJ020060149 (DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 QR100-130 QK900-989 Salma Mukhtar verfasserin aut Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. Plant culture Microbial ecology Plant ecology Ann M. Hirsch verfasserin aut Noor Khan verfasserin aut Kauser A. Malik verfasserin aut Ethan A. Humm verfasserin aut Matteo Pellegrini verfasserin aut Baochen Shi verfasserin aut Leah Briscoe verfasserin aut Marcel Huntemann verfasserin aut Alicia Clum verfasserin aut Brian Foster verfasserin aut Bryce Foster verfasserin aut Simon Roux verfasserin aut Krishnaveni Palaniappan verfasserin aut Neha Varghese verfasserin aut Supratim Mukherjee verfasserin aut T.B.K. Reddy verfasserin aut Chris Daum verfasserin aut Alex Copeland verfasserin aut Natalia N. Ivanova verfasserin aut Nikos C. Kyrpides verfasserin aut Nicole Shapiro verfasserin aut Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh verfasserin aut Maskit Maymon verfasserin aut Muhammad S. Mirza verfasserin aut Samina Mehnaz verfasserin aut In Phytobiomes Journal The American Phytopathological Society, 2018 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 (DE-627)890367132 (DE-600)2897163-2 24712906 nnns volume:4 year:2020 number:4 pages:364-374 https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2020 4 364-374 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Phytobiomes Journal 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 volume:4 year:2020 number:4 pages:364-374 |
| sourceStr |
In Phytobiomes Journal 4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374 volume:4 year:2020 number:4 pages:364-374 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Plant culture Microbial ecology Plant ecology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Phytobiomes Journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Salma Mukhtar @@aut@@ Ann M. Hirsch @@aut@@ Noor Khan @@aut@@ Kauser A. Malik @@aut@@ Ethan A. Humm @@aut@@ Matteo Pellegrini @@aut@@ Baochen Shi @@aut@@ Leah Briscoe @@aut@@ Marcel Huntemann @@aut@@ Alicia Clum @@aut@@ Brian Foster @@aut@@ Bryce Foster @@aut@@ Simon Roux @@aut@@ Krishnaveni Palaniappan @@aut@@ Neha Varghese @@aut@@ Supratim Mukherjee @@aut@@ T.B.K. Reddy @@aut@@ Chris Daum @@aut@@ Alex Copeland @@aut@@ Natalia N. Ivanova @@aut@@ Nikos C. Kyrpides @@aut@@ Nicole Shapiro @@aut@@ Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh @@aut@@ Maskit Maymon @@aut@@ Muhammad S. Mirza @@aut@@ Samina Mehnaz @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
890367132 |
| id |
DOAJ020060149 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ020060149</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310114110.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ020060149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QR100-130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QK900-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salma Mukhtar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Microbial ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ann M. Hirsch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Noor Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kauser A. Malik</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ethan A. Humm</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matteo Pellegrini</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baochen Shi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leah Briscoe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcel Huntemann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alicia Clum</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brian Foster</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bryce Foster</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simon Roux</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krishnaveni Palaniappan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Neha Varghese</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Supratim Mukherjee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.B.K. Reddy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chris Daum</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alex Copeland</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Natalia N. Ivanova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nikos C. Kyrpides</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nicole Shapiro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maskit Maymon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad S. Mirza</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samina Mehnaz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Phytobiomes Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">The American Phytopathological Society, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)890367132</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2897163-2</subfield><subfield code="x">24712906</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:364-374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">364-374</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
| author |
Salma Mukhtar |
| spellingShingle |
Salma Mukhtar misc SB1-1110 misc QR100-130 misc QK900-989 misc Plant culture misc Microbial ecology misc Plant ecology Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress |
| authorStr |
Salma Mukhtar |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)890367132 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
SB1-1110 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24712906 |
| topic_title |
SB1-1110 QR100-130 QK900-989 Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress |
| topic |
misc SB1-1110 misc QR100-130 misc QK900-989 misc Plant culture misc Microbial ecology misc Plant ecology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc SB1-1110 misc QR100-130 misc QK900-989 misc Plant culture misc Microbial ecology misc Plant ecology |
| topic_browse |
misc SB1-1110 misc QR100-130 misc QK900-989 misc Plant culture misc Microbial ecology misc Plant ecology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Phytobiomes Journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
890367132 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Phytobiomes Journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)890367132 (DE-600)2897163-2 |
| title |
Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ020060149 (DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea |
| title_full |
Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress |
| author_sort |
Salma Mukhtar |
| journal |
Phytobiomes Journal |
| journalStr |
Phytobiomes Journal |
| callnumber-first-code |
S |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
364 |
| author_browse |
Salma Mukhtar Ann M. Hirsch Noor Khan Kauser A. Malik Ethan A. Humm Matteo Pellegrini Baochen Shi Leah Briscoe Marcel Huntemann Alicia Clum Brian Foster Bryce Foster Simon Roux Krishnaveni Palaniappan Neha Varghese Supratim Mukherjee T.B.K. Reddy Chris Daum Alex Copeland Natalia N. Ivanova Nikos C. Kyrpides Nicole Shapiro Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh Maskit Maymon Muhammad S. Mirza Samina Mehnaz |
| container_volume |
4 |
| class |
SB1-1110 QR100-130 QK900-989 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Salma Mukhtar |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
impact of soil salinity on the cowpea nodule-microbiome and the isolation of halotolerant pgpr strains to promote plant growth under salinity stress |
| callnumber |
SB1-1110 |
| title_auth |
Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress |
| abstract |
Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. |
| abstractGer |
Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Ann M. Hirsch Noor Khan Kauser A. Malik Ethan A. Humm Matteo Pellegrini Baochen Shi Leah Briscoe Marcel Huntemann Alicia Clum Brian Foster Bryce Foster Simon Roux Krishnaveni Palaniappan Neha Varghese Supratim Mukherjee T.B.K. Reddy Chris Daum Alex Copeland Natalia N. Ivanova Nikos C. Kyrpides Nicole Shapiro Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh Maskit Maymon Muhammad S. Mirza Samina Mehnaz |
| author2Str |
Ann M. Hirsch Noor Khan Kauser A. Malik Ethan A. Humm Matteo Pellegrini Baochen Shi Leah Briscoe Marcel Huntemann Alicia Clum Brian Foster Bryce Foster Simon Roux Krishnaveni Palaniappan Neha Varghese Supratim Mukherjee T.B.K. Reddy Chris Daum Alex Copeland Natalia N. Ivanova Nikos C. Kyrpides Nicole Shapiro Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh Maskit Maymon Muhammad S. Mirza Samina Mehnaz |
| ppnlink |
890367132 |
| callnumber-subject |
SB - Plant Culture |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R |
| callnumber-a |
SB1-1110 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:57:06.538Z |
| _version_ |
1803611774953455616 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ020060149</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310114110.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ020060149</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QR100-130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QK900-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salma Mukhtar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cowpea is one of the major legumes cultivated in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Four soil-microbial samples (SS-1 through SS-4) collected from semiarid soils in Punjab, Pakistan were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) crops, which were grown under salinity stress to analyze bacterial composition in the rhizosphere and within nodules using cultivation-dependent and -independent methods. Two varieties, 603 and the salt-tolerant CB 46, were each inoculated with or without the four different native soil samples or grown in medium either N-deficient (−N) or supplemented with N (+N). Plants inoculated with soil samples SS-2 and SS-4 grew better than plants inoculated with SS-1- and SS-3 and grew comparably with the +N controls. Environmental DNA (eDNA) was isolated from SS-1 and SS-4, and, by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, the soil microbiomes consisted mainly of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and other nonproteobacterial genera. However, analysis of eDNA isolated from cowpea nodules established by the trap plants showed that the nodule microbiome consisted almost exclusively of proteobacterial sequences, particularly species of Bradyrhizobium. Bacteria were isolated from both soils and nodules, and 34 of the 51 isolates tested positive for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits in plate assays. Many could serve as future inocula for crops in arid soils. The discrepancy between the types of bacteria isolated by culturing bacteria isolated from surface-sterilized cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected by sequencing DNA isolated from the nodules (proteobacteria) from cowpea nodules (proteobacteria and nonproteobacteria) versus those detected in the nodule microbiome (proteobacteria) needs further study.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Microbial ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ann M. Hirsch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Noor Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kauser A. Malik</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ethan A. Humm</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matteo Pellegrini</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baochen Shi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leah Briscoe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcel Huntemann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alicia Clum</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brian Foster</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bryce Foster</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simon Roux</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krishnaveni Palaniappan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Neha Varghese</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Supratim Mukherjee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.B.K. Reddy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chris Daum</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alex Copeland</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Natalia N. Ivanova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nikos C. Kyrpides</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nicole Shapiro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maskit Maymon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad S. Mirza</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samina Mehnaz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Phytobiomes Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">The American Phytopathological Society, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2020), 4, Seite 364-374</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)890367132</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2897163-2</subfield><subfield code="x">24712906</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:364-374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cc1e5d38a4654643a4fa30ea7e52e4ea</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-19-0057-R</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2471-2906</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">364-374</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399684 |