THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR
Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the resear...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari [verfasserIn] Puspita Sari [verfasserIn] Achmad Subagio [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Food ScienTech Journal - Department of Food Technology, 2020, 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2019 ; number:1 ; pages:8-19 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ02080329X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ02080329X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414112908.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ02080329X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a TP368-456 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Subekah Nawa Kartikasari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Food processing and manufacture | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Puspita Sari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Achmad Subagio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Food ScienTech Journal |d Department of Food Technology, 2020 |g 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 |w (DE-627)1760609366 |x 2715422X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:8-19 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 2019 |e 1 |h 8-19 | ||
| author_variant |
s n k snk p s ps a s as |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:2715422X:2019----::hefcoipoeadtoosetramd |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
TP |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02080329X (DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP368-456 Subekah Nawa Kartikasari verfasserin aut THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava Food processing and manufacture Puspita Sari verfasserin aut Achmad Subagio verfasserin aut In Food ScienTech Journal Department of Food Technology, 2020 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 (DE-627)1760609366 2715422X nnns volume:1 year:2019 number:1 pages:8-19 https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 kostenfrei https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2019 1 8-19 |
| spelling |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02080329X (DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP368-456 Subekah Nawa Kartikasari verfasserin aut THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava Food processing and manufacture Puspita Sari verfasserin aut Achmad Subagio verfasserin aut In Food ScienTech Journal Department of Food Technology, 2020 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 (DE-627)1760609366 2715422X nnns volume:1 year:2019 number:1 pages:8-19 https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 kostenfrei https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2019 1 8-19 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02080329X (DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP368-456 Subekah Nawa Kartikasari verfasserin aut THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava Food processing and manufacture Puspita Sari verfasserin aut Achmad Subagio verfasserin aut In Food ScienTech Journal Department of Food Technology, 2020 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 (DE-627)1760609366 2715422X nnns volume:1 year:2019 number:1 pages:8-19 https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 kostenfrei https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2019 1 8-19 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02080329X (DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP368-456 Subekah Nawa Kartikasari verfasserin aut THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava Food processing and manufacture Puspita Sari verfasserin aut Achmad Subagio verfasserin aut In Food ScienTech Journal Department of Food Technology, 2020 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 (DE-627)1760609366 2715422X nnns volume:1 year:2019 number:1 pages:8-19 https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 kostenfrei https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2019 1 8-19 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02080329X (DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP368-456 Subekah Nawa Kartikasari verfasserin aut THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava Food processing and manufacture Puspita Sari verfasserin aut Achmad Subagio verfasserin aut In Food ScienTech Journal Department of Food Technology, 2020 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 (DE-627)1760609366 2715422X nnns volume:1 year:2019 number:1 pages:8-19 https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 kostenfrei https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2019 1 8-19 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Food ScienTech Journal 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 volume:1 year:2019 number:1 pages:8-19 |
| sourceStr |
In Food ScienTech Journal 1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19 volume:1 year:2019 number:1 pages:8-19 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava Food processing and manufacture |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Food ScienTech Journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari @@aut@@ Puspita Sari @@aut@@ Achmad Subagio @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760609366 |
| id |
DOAJ02080329X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ02080329X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414112908.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ02080329X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Subekah Nawa Kartikasari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p &lt;0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Puspita Sari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Achmad Subagio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Food ScienTech Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Department of Food Technology, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760609366</subfield><subfield code="x">2715422X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">8-19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
| author |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari |
| spellingShingle |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari misc TP368-456 misc improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava misc Food processing and manufacture THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR |
| authorStr |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760609366 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
TP368-456 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2715422X |
| topic_title |
TP368-456 THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava |
| topic |
misc TP368-456 misc improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava misc Food processing and manufacture |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc TP368-456 misc improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava misc Food processing and manufacture |
| topic_browse |
misc TP368-456 misc improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava misc Food processing and manufacture |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Food ScienTech Journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760609366 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Food ScienTech Journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760609366 |
| title |
THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ02080329X (DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 |
| title_full |
THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR |
| author_sort |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari |
| journal |
Food ScienTech Journal |
| journalStr |
Food ScienTech Journal |
| callnumber-first-code |
T |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
8 |
| author_browse |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari Puspita Sari Achmad Subagio |
| container_volume |
1 |
| class |
TP368-456 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Subekah Nawa Kartikasari |
| doi_str_mv |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
effect of improver addition on sweet bread made from wheat flour |
| callnumber |
TP368-456 |
| title_auth |
THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR |
| abstract |
Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. |
| abstractGer |
Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833 https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193 https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279 https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Puspita Sari Achmad Subagio |
| author2Str |
Puspita Sari Achmad Subagio |
| ppnlink |
1760609366 |
| callnumber-subject |
TP - Chemical Technology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193 |
| callnumber-a |
TP368-456 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:05:51.096Z |
| _version_ |
1803578351192899584 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ02080329X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414112908.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ02080329X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Subekah Nawa Kartikasari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p &lt;0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">improver, mocaf, modified starch, bread, cassava</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Puspita Sari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Achmad Subagio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Food ScienTech Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Department of Food Technology, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2019), 1, Seite 8-19</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760609366</subfield><subfield code="x">2715422X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/18a03bd20e8d48ad8822e4638d3fc833</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/fsj/article/view/6193</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2685-4279</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2715-422X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">8-19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399708 |