Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip
Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Kathie H Wang [verfasserIn] Carrie L Heike [verfasserIn] Melissa eClarkson [verfasserIn] Jose L. V Mejino [verfasserIn] James F Brinkley [verfasserIn] Raymond W Tse [verfasserIn] Craig B Birgfeld [verfasserIn] David A Fitzsimons [verfasserIn] Timothy C Cox [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Frontiers in Physiology - Frontiers Media S.A., 2011, 5(2014) |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:5 ; year:2014 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ020952686 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ020952686 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307042323.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ020952686 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QP1-981 | |
100 | 0 | |a Kathie H Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Cleft Lip | |
650 | 4 | |a ontology | |
650 | 4 | |a classification system | |
650 | 4 | |a orofacial clefts | |
650 | 4 | |a forme fruste | |
650 | 4 | |a incomplete cleft | |
653 | 0 | |a Physiology | |
700 | 0 | |a Carrie L Heike |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Carrie L Heike |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Carrie L Heike |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Melissa eClarkson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Melissa eClarkson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jose L. V Mejino |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a James F Brinkley |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a James F Brinkley |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Raymond W Tse |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Craig B Birgfeld |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a David A Fitzsimons |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a David A Fitzsimons |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Timothy C Cox |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Timothy C Cox |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Timothy C Cox |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Timothy C Cox |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Frontiers in Physiology |d Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 |g 5(2014) |w (DE-627)631498788 |w (DE-600)2564217-0 |x 1664042X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2014 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 5 |j 2014 |
author_variant |
k h w khw c l h clh c l h clh c l h clh m e me m e me j l v m jlvm j f b jfb j f b jfb r w t rwt c b b cbb d a f daf d a f daf t c c tcc t c c tcc t c c tcc t c c tcc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:1664042X:2014----::vlainnitgainfiprtcasfctosse |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QP |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 doi (DE-627)DOAJ020952686 (DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QP1-981 Kathie H Wang verfasserin aut Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. Cleft Lip ontology classification system orofacial clefts forme fruste incomplete cleft Physiology Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Jose L. V Mejino verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut Raymond W Tse verfasserin aut Craig B Birgfeld verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Physiology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 5(2014) (DE-627)631498788 (DE-600)2564217-0 1664042X nnns volume:5 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf kostenfrei http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2014 |
spelling |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 doi (DE-627)DOAJ020952686 (DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QP1-981 Kathie H Wang verfasserin aut Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. Cleft Lip ontology classification system orofacial clefts forme fruste incomplete cleft Physiology Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Jose L. V Mejino verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut Raymond W Tse verfasserin aut Craig B Birgfeld verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Physiology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 5(2014) (DE-627)631498788 (DE-600)2564217-0 1664042X nnns volume:5 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf kostenfrei http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2014 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 doi (DE-627)DOAJ020952686 (DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QP1-981 Kathie H Wang verfasserin aut Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. Cleft Lip ontology classification system orofacial clefts forme fruste incomplete cleft Physiology Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Jose L. V Mejino verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut Raymond W Tse verfasserin aut Craig B Birgfeld verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Physiology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 5(2014) (DE-627)631498788 (DE-600)2564217-0 1664042X nnns volume:5 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf kostenfrei http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2014 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 doi (DE-627)DOAJ020952686 (DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QP1-981 Kathie H Wang verfasserin aut Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. Cleft Lip ontology classification system orofacial clefts forme fruste incomplete cleft Physiology Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Jose L. V Mejino verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut Raymond W Tse verfasserin aut Craig B Birgfeld verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Physiology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 5(2014) (DE-627)631498788 (DE-600)2564217-0 1664042X nnns volume:5 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf kostenfrei http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2014 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 doi (DE-627)DOAJ020952686 (DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QP1-981 Kathie H Wang verfasserin aut Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. Cleft Lip ontology classification system orofacial clefts forme fruste incomplete cleft Physiology Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Carrie L Heike verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Melissa eClarkson verfasserin aut Jose L. V Mejino verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut James F Brinkley verfasserin aut Raymond W Tse verfasserin aut Craig B Birgfeld verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut David A Fitzsimons verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut Timothy C Cox verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Physiology Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 5(2014) (DE-627)631498788 (DE-600)2564217-0 1664042X nnns volume:5 year:2014 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf kostenfrei http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2014 |
language |
English |
source |
In Frontiers in Physiology 5(2014) volume:5 year:2014 |
sourceStr |
In Frontiers in Physiology 5(2014) volume:5 year:2014 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Cleft Lip ontology classification system orofacial clefts forme fruste incomplete cleft Physiology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Frontiers in Physiology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kathie H Wang @@aut@@ Carrie L Heike @@aut@@ Melissa eClarkson @@aut@@ Jose L. V Mejino @@aut@@ James F Brinkley @@aut@@ Raymond W Tse @@aut@@ Craig B Birgfeld @@aut@@ David A Fitzsimons @@aut@@ Timothy C Cox @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
631498788 |
id |
DOAJ020952686 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ020952686</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307042323.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fphys.2014.00163</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ020952686</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QP1-981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kathie H Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cleft Lip</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ontology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">classification system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">orofacial clefts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forme fruste</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">incomplete cleft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carrie L Heike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carrie L Heike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carrie L Heike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melissa eClarkson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melissa eClarkson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jose L. V Mejino</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">James F Brinkley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">James F Brinkley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raymond W Tse</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Craig B Birgfeld</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David A Fitzsimons</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David A Fitzsimons</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Physiology</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2014)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)631498788</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2564217-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1664042X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Kathie H Wang |
spellingShingle |
Kathie H Wang misc QP1-981 misc Cleft Lip misc ontology misc classification system misc orofacial clefts misc forme fruste misc incomplete cleft misc Physiology Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip |
authorStr |
Kathie H Wang |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)631498788 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QP1-981 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1664042X |
topic_title |
QP1-981 Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip Cleft Lip ontology classification system orofacial clefts forme fruste incomplete cleft |
topic |
misc QP1-981 misc Cleft Lip misc ontology misc classification system misc orofacial clefts misc forme fruste misc incomplete cleft misc Physiology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QP1-981 misc Cleft Lip misc ontology misc classification system misc orofacial clefts misc forme fruste misc incomplete cleft misc Physiology |
topic_browse |
misc QP1-981 misc Cleft Lip misc ontology misc classification system misc orofacial clefts misc forme fruste misc incomplete cleft misc Physiology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Frontiers in Physiology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
631498788 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Frontiers in Physiology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)631498788 (DE-600)2564217-0 |
title |
Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ020952686 (DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf |
title_full |
Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip |
author_sort |
Kathie H Wang |
journal |
Frontiers in Physiology |
journalStr |
Frontiers in Physiology |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Kathie H Wang Carrie L Heike Melissa eClarkson Jose L. V Mejino James F Brinkley Raymond W Tse Craig B Birgfeld David A Fitzsimons Timothy C Cox |
container_volume |
5 |
class |
QP1-981 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Kathie H Wang |
doi_str_mv |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip |
callnumber |
QP1-981 |
title_auth |
Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip |
abstract |
Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. |
abstractGer |
Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Carrie L Heike Melissa eClarkson Jose L. V Mejino James F Brinkley Raymond W Tse Craig B Birgfeld David A Fitzsimons Timothy C Cox |
author2Str |
Carrie L Heike Melissa eClarkson Jose L. V Mejino James F Brinkley Raymond W Tse Craig B Birgfeld David A Fitzsimons Timothy C Cox |
ppnlink |
631498788 |
callnumber-subject |
QP - Physiology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3389/fphys.2014.00163 |
callnumber-a |
QP1-981 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T17:59:19.136Z |
_version_ |
1803581715002687488 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ020952686</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307042323.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fphys.2014.00163</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ020952686</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QP1-981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kathie H Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Orofacial clefting is a common birth defect with wide phenotypic variability. Many systems have been developed to classify cleft patterns to facilitate diagnosis, management, surgical treatment, and research. In this review, we examine the rationale for different existing classification schemes and determine their inter-relationships, as well as strengths and deficiencies for subclassification of clefts of the lip. The various systems differ in how they describe and define attributes of cleft lip phenotypes. Application and analysis of the cleft lip classifications reveal discrepancies that may result in errors when comparing studies that use different systems. These inconsistencies in terminology, variable levels of subclassification, and ambiguity in some descriptions may confound analyses and impede further research aimed at understanding the genetics and etiology of clefts, development of effective treatment options for patients, as well as cross-institutional comparisons of outcome measures. Identification and reconciliation of discrepancies among existing systems is the first step towards creating a common standard to allow for a more explicit interpretation that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the causes and manifestations of phenotypic variations in clefting.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cleft Lip</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ontology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">classification system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">orofacial clefts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forme fruste</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">incomplete cleft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carrie L Heike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carrie L Heike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carrie L Heike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melissa eClarkson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melissa eClarkson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jose L. V Mejino</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">James F Brinkley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">James F Brinkley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raymond W Tse</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Craig B Birgfeld</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David A Fitzsimons</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David A Fitzsimons</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Timothy C Cox</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Physiology</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2014)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)631498788</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2564217-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1664042X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0a0c9a600b754220af639ee8fd4026bf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2014.00163/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1664-042X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.40018 |