Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis

Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revea...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Amrullah Shidiki [verfasserIn] Ashish Vyas [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal - Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019, 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:6 ; year:2022 ; number:1 ; pages:66-72

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ021238510

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ021238510
003	DE-627
005	20230307044704.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ021238510
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TP248.13-248.65
100	0		\|a Amrullah Shidiki \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB.
650		4	\|a constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
650		4	\|a inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus
650		4	\|a liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy
650		4	\|a methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
650		4	\|a syzygium cumini
653		0	\|a Biotechnology
700	0		\|a Ashish Vyas \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal \|d Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019 \|g 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 \|w (DE-627)1666372854 \|x 25889842 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:6 \|g year:2022 \|g number:1 \|g pages:66-72
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 6 \|j 2022 \|e 1 \|h 66-72

Indexfelder

author_variant	a s as a v av
matchkey_str	article:25889842:2022----::vlainfniatraptnilfyyimuiigismtiilneitnsahlccuaruadarldlnoaietetgaibtanosahlccua
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	TP
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021238510 (DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Amrullah Shidiki verfasserin aut Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini Biotechnology Ashish Vyas verfasserin aut In Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 (DE-627)1666372854 25889842 nnns volume:6 year:2022 number:1 pages:66-72 https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 kostenfrei http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2022 1 66-72
spelling	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021238510 (DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Amrullah Shidiki verfasserin aut Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini Biotechnology Ashish Vyas verfasserin aut In Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 (DE-627)1666372854 25889842 nnns volume:6 year:2022 number:1 pages:66-72 https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 kostenfrei http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2022 1 66-72
allfields_unstemmed	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021238510 (DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Amrullah Shidiki verfasserin aut Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini Biotechnology Ashish Vyas verfasserin aut In Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 (DE-627)1666372854 25889842 nnns volume:6 year:2022 number:1 pages:66-72 https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 kostenfrei http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2022 1 66-72
allfieldsGer	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021238510 (DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Amrullah Shidiki verfasserin aut Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini Biotechnology Ashish Vyas verfasserin aut In Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 (DE-627)1666372854 25889842 nnns volume:6 year:2022 number:1 pages:66-72 https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 kostenfrei http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2022 1 66-72
allfieldsSound	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021238510 (DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP248.13-248.65 Amrullah Shidiki verfasserin aut Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini Biotechnology Ashish Vyas verfasserin aut In Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 (DE-627)1666372854 25889842 nnns volume:6 year:2022 number:1 pages:66-72 https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 kostenfrei http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2022 1 66-72
language	English
source	In Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 volume:6 year:2022 number:1 pages:66-72
sourceStr	In Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal 6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72 volume:6 year:2022 number:1 pages:66-72
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini Biotechnology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Amrullah Shidiki @@aut@@ Ashish Vyas @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1666372854
id	DOAJ021238510
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ021238510</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307044704.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ021238510</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP248.13-248.65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amrullah Shidiki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">syzygium cumini</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ashish Vyas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1666372854</subfield><subfield code="x">25889842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:66-72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">66-72</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Amrullah Shidiki
spellingShingle	Amrullah Shidiki misc TP248.13-248.65 misc constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus misc liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy misc methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc syzygium cumini misc Biotechnology Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis
authorStr	Amrullah Shidiki
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1666372854
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TP248
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	25889842
topic_title	TP248.13-248.65 Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus syzygium cumini
topic	misc TP248.13-248.65 misc constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus misc liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy misc methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc syzygium cumini misc Biotechnology
topic_unstemmed	misc TP248.13-248.65 misc constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus misc liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy misc methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc syzygium cumini misc Biotechnology
topic_browse	misc TP248.13-248.65 misc constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus misc liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy misc methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus misc syzygium cumini misc Biotechnology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
hierarchy_parent_id	1666372854
hierarchy_top_title	Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1666372854
title	Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ021238510 (DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23
title_full	Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis
author_sort	Amrullah Shidiki
journal	Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
journalStr	Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	66
author_browse	Amrullah Shidiki Ashish Vyas
container_volume	6
class	TP248.13-248.65
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Amrullah Shidiki
doi_str_mv	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	evaluation of antibacterial potential of syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin b strains of staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis
callnumber	TP248.13-248.65
title_auth	Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis
abstract	Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB.
abstractGer	Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB.
abstract_unstemmed	Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis
url	https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21 https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23 http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834 https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842
remote_bool	true
author2	Ashish Vyas
author2Str	Ashish Vyas
ppnlink	1666372854
callnumber-subject	TP - Chemical Technology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21
callnumber-a	TP248.13-248.65
up_date	2024-07-03T19:42:55.034Z
_version_	1803588232846245888
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ021238510</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307044704.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ021238510</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP248.13-248.65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amrullah Shidiki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus as in form of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistant S. aureus (iMLSB) and constitutive clindamycin-resistant S. aureus (cMLSB) are the major causes of death. An ethnobotanical survey of Syzygium cumini revealed that bioactive compounds showed effective against tested these resistant strains of S. aureus. Methods: The main goal of this study is to screening of phytochemicals by different biochemical tests, antimicrobial evaluation as per agar well-diffusion method and identification of chemical constituents of leaves of Syzygium cumini via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) technique. Results: The extractive yield was higher with ethanol extract (18.10 ± 0.10). Four phytoconstituents, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannin found in four solvent extracts except hexane. The zone of inhibition was higher in aqueous extract with ranges 17–27 mm. Twenty different chemical constituents of leaves of aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini were identified through the application of LCMS data. Conclusion: The Syzygium cumini of phytoconstituents showed antibacterial activity against MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB. Thus, it may help for the treatment of diseases caused by MRSA, iMLSB, and cMLSB.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">constitutive clindamycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inducible clindamycin resistant staphylococcus aureus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">syzygium cumini</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ashish Vyas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2022), 1, Seite 66-72</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1666372854</subfield><subfield code="x">25889842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:66-72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_139_21</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e65d1968059847fab9933b981e825d23</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.bmbtrj.org/article.asp?issn=2588-9834;year=2022;volume=6;issue=1;spage=66;epage=72;aulast=Shidiki</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9834</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2588-9842</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">66-72</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.40038

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Evaluation of antibacterial potential of Syzygium cumini against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B strains of Staphylococcus aureus and its liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?