“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics
Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; tgl |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Scientia - College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018, 8(2019), 2 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2019 ; number:2 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ021244871 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ021244871 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307044734.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ021244871 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a tgl | ||
100 | 0 | |a Jeremiah Joven Joaquin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a “The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Metametaphysics | |
650 | 4 | |a Metaphysical Realism | |
650 | 4 | |a Metaphysical Anti-realism | |
650 | 4 | |a “The Death of Metaphysics” | |
653 | 0 | |a General Works | |
653 | 0 | |a A | |
653 | 0 | |a Language and Literature | |
653 | 0 | |a P | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Scientia |d College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018 |g 8(2019), 2 |w (DE-627)1760638471 |x 2546194X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2019 |e 2 |
author_variant |
j j j jjj |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:2546194X:2019----::hdahfeahscamt |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021244871 (DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng tgl Jeremiah Joven Joaquin verfasserin aut “The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. Metametaphysics Metaphysical Realism Metaphysical Anti-realism “The Death of Metaphysics” General Works A Language and Literature P In Scientia College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018 8(2019), 2 (DE-627)1760638471 2546194X nnns volume:8 year:2019 number:2 https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 kostenfrei https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2019 2 |
spelling |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021244871 (DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng tgl Jeremiah Joven Joaquin verfasserin aut “The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. Metametaphysics Metaphysical Realism Metaphysical Anti-realism “The Death of Metaphysics” General Works A Language and Literature P In Scientia College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018 8(2019), 2 (DE-627)1760638471 2546194X nnns volume:8 year:2019 number:2 https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 kostenfrei https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2019 2 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021244871 (DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng tgl Jeremiah Joven Joaquin verfasserin aut “The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. Metametaphysics Metaphysical Realism Metaphysical Anti-realism “The Death of Metaphysics” General Works A Language and Literature P In Scientia College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018 8(2019), 2 (DE-627)1760638471 2546194X nnns volume:8 year:2019 number:2 https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 kostenfrei https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2019 2 |
allfieldsGer |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021244871 (DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng tgl Jeremiah Joven Joaquin verfasserin aut “The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. Metametaphysics Metaphysical Realism Metaphysical Anti-realism “The Death of Metaphysics” General Works A Language and Literature P In Scientia College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018 8(2019), 2 (DE-627)1760638471 2546194X nnns volume:8 year:2019 number:2 https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 kostenfrei https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2019 2 |
allfieldsSound |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 doi (DE-627)DOAJ021244871 (DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng tgl Jeremiah Joven Joaquin verfasserin aut “The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. Metametaphysics Metaphysical Realism Metaphysical Anti-realism “The Death of Metaphysics” General Works A Language and Literature P In Scientia College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018 8(2019), 2 (DE-627)1760638471 2546194X nnns volume:8 year:2019 number:2 https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 kostenfrei https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2019 2 |
language |
English Tagalog |
source |
In Scientia 8(2019), 2 volume:8 year:2019 number:2 |
sourceStr |
In Scientia 8(2019), 2 volume:8 year:2019 number:2 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Metametaphysics Metaphysical Realism Metaphysical Anti-realism “The Death of Metaphysics” General Works A Language and Literature P |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Scientia |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760638471 |
id |
DOAJ021244871 |
language_de |
englisch Tagalog |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ021244871</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307044734.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ021244871</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">tgl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeremiah Joven Joaquin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metametaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metaphysical Realism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metaphysical Anti-realism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">“The Death of Metaphysics”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">General Works</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Language and Literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientia</subfield><subfield code="d">College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2019), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760638471</subfield><subfield code="x">2546194X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin |
spellingShingle |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin misc Metametaphysics misc Metaphysical Realism misc Metaphysical Anti-realism misc “The Death of Metaphysics” misc General Works misc A misc Language and Literature misc P “The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics |
authorStr |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760638471 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2546194X |
topic_title |
“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics Metametaphysics Metaphysical Realism Metaphysical Anti-realism “The Death of Metaphysics” |
topic |
misc Metametaphysics misc Metaphysical Realism misc Metaphysical Anti-realism misc “The Death of Metaphysics” misc General Works misc A misc Language and Literature misc P |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Metametaphysics misc Metaphysical Realism misc Metaphysical Anti-realism misc “The Death of Metaphysics” misc General Works misc A misc Language and Literature misc P |
topic_browse |
misc Metametaphysics misc Metaphysical Realism misc Metaphysical Anti-realism misc “The Death of Metaphysics” misc General Works misc A misc Language and Literature misc P |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Scientia |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760638471 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Scientia |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760638471 |
title |
“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ021244871 (DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 |
title_full |
“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics |
author_sort |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin |
journal |
Scientia |
journalStr |
Scientia |
lang_code |
eng tgl |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin |
container_volume |
8 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin |
doi_str_mv |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 |
title_sort |
“the death of metaphysics” as metametaphysics |
title_auth |
“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics |
abstract |
Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. |
abstractGer |
Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics |
url |
https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96 https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108 https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1760638471 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:45:16.749Z |
_version_ |
1803588381449388032 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ021244871</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307044734.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ021244871</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">tgl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeremiah Joven Joaquin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">“The Death of Metaphysics” as Metametaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the years, many philosophers have proclaimed the death of metaphysics, the death of that area of philosophy concerned with the study of reality as such. But what exactly do they mean by this? What does this death-of-metaphysics idea imply? In this paper, I offer a way to articulate this idea by formulating it as a metametaphysical thesis about the non-substantivity of metaphysical claims. I argue that given this formulation such a metametaphysical thesis seems implausible. References Balog, Katalin. “In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, (2012): 1-23. Chalmers David, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Chalmers, David. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, (2011): 475–513. Chalmers, David. “Ontological Anti-Realism,” in Metametaphysics, 2009, 77-129. Hirsch, Eli. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12, (2002): 51-73. Jenkins, Carrie, “What is Ontological Realism?” Philosophical Compass 5, (2010): 880-890. Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Manley, David. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 1-37. Shoemaker, Sydney. “Time without Change.” Journal of Philosophy 66, (1969): 363-381. Sider, Theodore. “Ontological Realism.” In Metametaphysics, 2009, 384-423.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metametaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metaphysical Realism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metaphysical Anti-realism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">“The Death of Metaphysics”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">General Works</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Language and Literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientia</subfield><subfield code="d">College of Liberal Arts, San Beda College, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2019), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760638471</subfield><subfield code="x">2546194X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v8i2.108</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/76f4976a3fc34e0fb021ee5836e59d96</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scientia-sanbeda.org/index.php/scientia/article/view/108</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2546-194X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399865 |