The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism
The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. Ho...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Lucian CHIȘU [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Deutsch ; Englisch ; Spanisch ; Französisch ; Italienisch ; Rumänisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa - Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010, 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2020 ; number:1 ; pages:19-32 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ021592721 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ021592721 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503055251.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ021592721 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ger |a eng |a spa |a fre |a ita |a rum | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a H1-99 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Lucian CHIȘU |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a n văpaia lunii | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 1971 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a anthology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ideological thaw | |
| 650 | 4 | |a nicolae balotă | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fănuș neagu | |
| 650 | 4 | |a classicization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical reception | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reorientation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Social sciences (General) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa |d Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010 |g 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 |w (DE-627)1760646598 |x 20670931 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:19-32 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 17 |j 2020 |e 1 |h 19-32 | ||
| author_variant |
l c lc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:20670931:2020----::hscnsotnnaunhslsiiainnvaaui17truhh |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
H |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ021592721 (DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng spa fre ita rum H1-99 Lucian CHIȘU verfasserin aut The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. n văpaia lunii 1971 anthology ideological thaw nicolae balotă fănuș neagu classicization critical reception reorientation Social sciences (General) In Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760646598 20670931 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:1 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 kostenfrei https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 17 2020 1 19-32 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ021592721 (DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng spa fre ita rum H1-99 Lucian CHIȘU verfasserin aut The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. n văpaia lunii 1971 anthology ideological thaw nicolae balotă fănuș neagu classicization critical reception reorientation Social sciences (General) In Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760646598 20670931 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:1 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 kostenfrei https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 17 2020 1 19-32 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ021592721 (DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng spa fre ita rum H1-99 Lucian CHIȘU verfasserin aut The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. n văpaia lunii 1971 anthology ideological thaw nicolae balotă fănuș neagu classicization critical reception reorientation Social sciences (General) In Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760646598 20670931 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:1 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 kostenfrei https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 17 2020 1 19-32 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ021592721 (DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng spa fre ita rum H1-99 Lucian CHIȘU verfasserin aut The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. n văpaia lunii 1971 anthology ideological thaw nicolae balotă fănuș neagu classicization critical reception reorientation Social sciences (General) In Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760646598 20670931 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:1 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 kostenfrei https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 17 2020 1 19-32 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ021592721 (DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng spa fre ita rum H1-99 Lucian CHIȘU verfasserin aut The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. n văpaia lunii 1971 anthology ideological thaw nicolae balotă fănuș neagu classicization critical reception reorientation Social sciences (General) In Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760646598 20670931 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:1 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 kostenfrei https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 17 2020 1 19-32 |
| language |
German English Spanish French Italian Romanian |
| source |
In Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 volume:17 year:2020 number:1 pages:19-32 |
| sourceStr |
In Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa 17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32 volume:17 year:2020 number:1 pages:19-32 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
n văpaia lunii 1971 anthology ideological thaw nicolae balotă fănuș neagu classicization critical reception reorientation Social sciences (General) |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Lucian CHIȘU @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760646598 |
| id |
DOAJ021592721 |
| language_de |
deutsch englisch spanisch franzoesisch italienisch rumaenisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ021592721</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055251.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ021592721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H1-99</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lucian CHIȘU</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">n văpaia lunii</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">1971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">anthology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ideological thaw</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nicolae balotă</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fănuș neagu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">classicization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical reception</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reorientation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social sciences (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa</subfield><subfield code="d">Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760646598</subfield><subfield code="x">20670931</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">19-32</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
| author |
Lucian CHIȘU |
| spellingShingle |
Lucian CHIȘU misc H1-99 misc n văpaia lunii misc 1971 misc anthology misc ideological thaw misc nicolae balotă misc fănuș neagu misc classicization misc critical reception misc reorientation misc Social sciences (General) The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism |
| authorStr |
Lucian CHIȘU |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760646598 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
H1-99 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
20670931 |
| topic_title |
H1-99 The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism n văpaia lunii 1971 anthology ideological thaw nicolae balotă fănuș neagu classicization critical reception reorientation |
| topic |
misc H1-99 misc n văpaia lunii misc 1971 misc anthology misc ideological thaw misc nicolae balotă misc fănuș neagu misc classicization misc critical reception misc reorientation misc Social sciences (General) |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc H1-99 misc n văpaia lunii misc 1971 misc anthology misc ideological thaw misc nicolae balotă misc fănuș neagu misc classicization misc critical reception misc reorientation misc Social sciences (General) |
| topic_browse |
misc H1-99 misc n văpaia lunii misc 1971 misc anthology misc ideological thaw misc nicolae balotă misc fănuș neagu misc classicization misc critical reception misc reorientation misc Social sciences (General) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760646598 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760646598 |
| title |
The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ021592721 (DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 |
| title_full |
The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism |
| author_sort |
Lucian CHIȘU |
| journal |
Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa |
| journalStr |
Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa |
| callnumber-first-code |
H |
| lang_code |
ger eng spa fre ita rum |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
19 |
| author_browse |
Lucian CHIȘU |
| container_volume |
17 |
| class |
H1-99 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Lucian CHIȘU |
| title_sort |
second shout: fănuș neagu and his classicization. on în văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism |
| callnumber |
H1-99 |
| title_auth |
The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism |
| abstract |
The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. |
| abstractGer |
The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840 https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760646598 |
| callnumber-subject |
H - Social Science |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
H1-99 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:45:32.503Z |
| _version_ |
1803595947707465728 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ021592721</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055251.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ021592721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H1-99</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lucian CHIȘU</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The second shout: Fănuș Neagu and his classicization. On În văpaia lunii (1971) through the eyes of literary criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The present article is concerned with the critical reception of the volume În văpaia lunii(1971), which was not expected to arouse major interest since it comprised a selection of texts that have been previously published, a practice often called „reheating the soup’ among specialists. However, În văpaia luniirepresents a favourable moment in the writer’s work and biography, which is why the author of the present article (incidentally) considered it to be the critics’ “second shout” -with a symbolic reference to the novel Îngerul a strigat (The Angel has shouted–transl. mine). Even though not fully favourable, the first “shout” was more than profitable for the young writer whose first volumes had sparked intense controversies. Fănuș Neagu had gained a capital of sympathy, unusual for those times. Despite the differences of opinion entertained by the cultural media, the incisive author had succeeded in creating a favourable “image” for himself and in maintaining a good relationship with all his critics, since beyond reproaches they could not ignore the freshness and the originality of his style. The second “shout” coincided with the publishing of the anthology În văpaia lunii (1971) and reached its climax in a several years, when the short stories collection Pierdut în Balcania (1982) was published and when the author reached his 50 years of life. The episode diminished by the end of 1989. Al last, pursuing the symbolism deriving from the novel Îngerul a strigat (1968), a third “shout” could be considered as the one that emerged in the period after 1989. Old “treatments” in form of unfounded and discriminatory insults –the writer was placed on the list of “the expiredones”1-were (re)brought to the fore. All these reproaches were coming both from the “young wolves” and from other older ones whose habits hardly died.Therefore, it can be sadly concluded that during the writer’s third biographical period Fănuș Neagu’s work has been distorted by a mirror held by some critics whose actions were generated ... by request. The present article is strictly concerned with the second “shout”.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">n văpaia lunii</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">1971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">anthology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ideological thaw</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nicolae balotă</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fănuș neagu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">classicization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical reception</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reorientation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social sciences (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Diversitate si Identitate Culturala in Europa</subfield><subfield code="d">Editura Muzeul National al Literaturii Romane, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2020), 1, Seite 19-32</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760646598</subfield><subfield code="x">20670931</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a0cd12acff894140a2d71d9171f51840</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.diversite.eu/pdf/17_1/DICE_17_1_Full_Text_p19-p32-Lucian-CHISU.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2067-0931</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">19-32</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3982067 |