Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min
Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of spec...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Yanti Kusuma [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Indonesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2008 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Jurnal Teknik Industri - Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018, 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2008 ; number:2 ; pages:134-141 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ022018344 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ022018344 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502145028.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ022018344 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a ind | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a T55.4-60.8 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a T58.7-58.8 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Yanti Kusuma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Industrial engineering. Management engineering | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Jurnal Teknik Industri |d Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018 |g 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 |w (DE-627)1760644803 |x 25274112 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2008 |g number:2 |g pages:134-141 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 8 |j 2008 |e 2 |h 134-141 | ||
| author_variant |
y k yk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25274112:2008----::vlaiupiregneguaa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2008 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
T |
| publishDate |
2008 |
| allfields |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022018344 (DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind T55.4-60.8 T58.7-58.8 Yanti Kusuma verfasserin aut Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test Industrial engineering. Management engineering Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity In Jurnal Teknik Industri Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 (DE-627)1760644803 25274112 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:2 pages:134-141 https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa kostenfrei http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 8 2008 2 134-141 |
| spelling |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022018344 (DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind T55.4-60.8 T58.7-58.8 Yanti Kusuma verfasserin aut Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test Industrial engineering. Management engineering Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity In Jurnal Teknik Industri Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 (DE-627)1760644803 25274112 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:2 pages:134-141 https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa kostenfrei http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 8 2008 2 134-141 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022018344 (DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind T55.4-60.8 T58.7-58.8 Yanti Kusuma verfasserin aut Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test Industrial engineering. Management engineering Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity In Jurnal Teknik Industri Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 (DE-627)1760644803 25274112 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:2 pages:134-141 https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa kostenfrei http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 8 2008 2 134-141 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022018344 (DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind T55.4-60.8 T58.7-58.8 Yanti Kusuma verfasserin aut Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test Industrial engineering. Management engineering Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity In Jurnal Teknik Industri Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 (DE-627)1760644803 25274112 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:2 pages:134-141 https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa kostenfrei http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 8 2008 2 134-141 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022018344 (DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind T55.4-60.8 T58.7-58.8 Yanti Kusuma verfasserin aut Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test Industrial engineering. Management engineering Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity In Jurnal Teknik Industri Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 (DE-627)1760644803 25274112 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:2 pages:134-141 https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa kostenfrei http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 8 2008 2 134-141 |
| language |
English Indonesian |
| source |
In Jurnal Teknik Industri 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 volume:8 year:2008 number:2 pages:134-141 |
| sourceStr |
In Jurnal Teknik Industri 8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141 volume:8 year:2008 number:2 pages:134-141 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test Industrial engineering. Management engineering Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Jurnal Teknik Industri |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Yanti Kusuma @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760644803 |
| id |
DOAJ022018344 |
| language_de |
englisch Sangiang |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022018344</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502145028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022018344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T55.4-60.8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T58.7-58.8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanti Kusuma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Industrial engineering. Management engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Teknik Industri</subfield><subfield code="d">Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760644803</subfield><subfield code="x">25274112</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:134-141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">134-141</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
| author |
Yanti Kusuma |
| spellingShingle |
Yanti Kusuma misc T55.4-60.8 misc T58.7-58.8 misc evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test misc Industrial engineering. Management engineering misc Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min |
| authorStr |
Yanti Kusuma |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760644803 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
T55 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
25274112 |
| topic_title |
T55.4-60.8 T58.7-58.8 Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test |
| topic |
misc T55.4-60.8 misc T58.7-58.8 misc evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test misc Industrial engineering. Management engineering misc Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc T55.4-60.8 misc T58.7-58.8 misc evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test misc Industrial engineering. Management engineering misc Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity |
| topic_browse |
misc T55.4-60.8 misc T58.7-58.8 misc evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test misc Industrial engineering. Management engineering misc Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Jurnal Teknik Industri |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760644803 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Jurnal Teknik Industri |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760644803 |
| title |
Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ022018344 (DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa |
| title_full |
Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min |
| author_sort |
Yanti Kusuma |
| journal |
Jurnal Teknik Industri |
| journalStr |
Jurnal Teknik Industri |
| callnumber-first-code |
T |
| lang_code |
eng ind |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2008 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
134 |
| author_browse |
Yanti Kusuma |
| container_volume |
8 |
| class |
T55.4-60.8 T58.7-58.8 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Yanti Kusuma |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 |
| title_sort |
evaluasi supplier dengan menggunakan metode max–min |
| callnumber |
T55.4-60.8 |
| title_auth |
Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min |
| abstract |
Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. |
| abstractGer |
Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107 https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431 https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760644803 |
| callnumber-subject |
T - General Technology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141 |
| callnumber-a |
T55.4-60.8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T23:51:54.599Z |
| _version_ |
1803603898113458176 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022018344</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502145028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022018344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T55.4-60.8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T58.7-58.8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanti Kusuma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluasi Supplier dengan Menggunakan Metode Max–Min</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Every company have more than one supplier for the supply of required material. This matter function to improve strength drive a bargain had by company as well as to take care of the availibility of product. Various problem related to supplier always emerge. For example, inappropriate quality of specification and delay of delivery. This situation push importantly of him evaluate supplier periodically for the agenda of getting supplier the bestness. This matter also happened in PT SAI Apparel Industries which producing ready made clothes. Intention of this research was to Choose type of supplier with biggest problem for the PT SAI Apparel Industries and measure performansi of suppliers. There are some methods evaluate supplier able to be used for the election of supplier. But the method seldom involving or joining performance variability at making decision processes. This is matter which necessary for buyer to estimate and put into some type of is calculation to more accurate in evaluating performance of supplier and improve effectiveness at making decision processes. This matter can reach by using approach of Max - Min, which can calculate value of efficiency maximum and minimum of supplier at process evaluate supplier. Later; Then result of this tested by statistic non parametric in identifying homogeneous group of supplier. By using 5 attribute selected by PT SAI Apparel Industries in the evaluation of him, got result of that PT Kahatex is best supplier (performer good), is later; then followed by Persh. YKK JKT, PT.Lucky Print Abadi, and Persh. Bintang Surya.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluate supplier, max–min approach, efficiency max-min, variability performance, Kruskall Wallis Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Industrial engineering. Management engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Production capacity. Manufacturing capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Teknik Industri</subfield><subfield code="d">Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2008), 2, Seite 134-141</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760644803</subfield><subfield code="x">25274112</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:134-141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol8.No2.134-141</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b56eb2f94a13449eb55a3b95d98fc2aa</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/industri/article/view/6107</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1431</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2527-4112</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">134-141</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.402767 |