Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage

Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	S. V. Pavlenkova [verfasserIn] G. P. Shuvaeva [verfasserIn] L. A. Miroshnichenko [verfasserIn] T. V. Sviridova [verfasserIn] E. A. Motina [verfasserIn] O. S. Korneeva [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Russisch

Erschienen:	2018

Schlagwörter:	silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий - Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016, 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:79 ; year:2018 ; number:4 ; pages:220-226

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ022151346

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ022151346
003	DE-627
005	20230307053923.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|rus c
024	7		\|a 10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ022151346
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a rus
050		0	\|a TP368-456
100	0		\|a S. V. Pavlenkova \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage
264		1	\|c 2018
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage.
650		4	\|a silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage
653		0	\|a Food processing and manufacture
700	0		\|a G. P. Shuvaeva \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a L. A. Miroshnichenko \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a T. V. Sviridova \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a E. A. Motina \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a O. S. Korneeva \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий \|d Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016 \|g 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 \|w (DE-627)88565837X \|w (DE-600)2893302-3 \|x 23101202 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:79 \|g year:2018 \|g number:4 \|g pages:220-226
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 79 \|j 2018 \|e 4 \|h 220-226

Indexfelder

author_variant	s v p svp g p s gps l a m lam t v s tvs e a m eam o s k osk
matchkey_str	article:23101202:2018----::oprtvcaatrsisfulttvidctroaa
hierarchy_sort_str	2018
callnumber-subject-code	TP
publishDate	2018
allfields	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022151346 (DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus TP368-456 S. V. Pavlenkova verfasserin aut Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage. silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage Food processing and manufacture G. P. Shuvaeva verfasserin aut L. A. Miroshnichenko verfasserin aut T. V. Sviridova verfasserin aut E. A. Motina verfasserin aut O. S. Korneeva verfasserin aut In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 (DE-627)88565837X (DE-600)2893302-3 23101202 nnns volume:79 year:2018 number:4 pages:220-226 https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac kostenfrei https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 79 2018 4 220-226
spelling	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022151346 (DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus TP368-456 S. V. Pavlenkova verfasserin aut Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage. silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage Food processing and manufacture G. P. Shuvaeva verfasserin aut L. A. Miroshnichenko verfasserin aut T. V. Sviridova verfasserin aut E. A. Motina verfasserin aut O. S. Korneeva verfasserin aut In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 (DE-627)88565837X (DE-600)2893302-3 23101202 nnns volume:79 year:2018 number:4 pages:220-226 https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac kostenfrei https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 79 2018 4 220-226
allfields_unstemmed	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022151346 (DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus TP368-456 S. V. Pavlenkova verfasserin aut Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage. silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage Food processing and manufacture G. P. Shuvaeva verfasserin aut L. A. Miroshnichenko verfasserin aut T. V. Sviridova verfasserin aut E. A. Motina verfasserin aut O. S. Korneeva verfasserin aut In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 (DE-627)88565837X (DE-600)2893302-3 23101202 nnns volume:79 year:2018 number:4 pages:220-226 https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac kostenfrei https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 79 2018 4 220-226
allfieldsGer	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022151346 (DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus TP368-456 S. V. Pavlenkova verfasserin aut Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage. silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage Food processing and manufacture G. P. Shuvaeva verfasserin aut L. A. Miroshnichenko verfasserin aut T. V. Sviridova verfasserin aut E. A. Motina verfasserin aut O. S. Korneeva verfasserin aut In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 (DE-627)88565837X (DE-600)2893302-3 23101202 nnns volume:79 year:2018 number:4 pages:220-226 https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac kostenfrei https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 79 2018 4 220-226
allfieldsSound	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022151346 (DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus TP368-456 S. V. Pavlenkova verfasserin aut Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage. silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage Food processing and manufacture G. P. Shuvaeva verfasserin aut L. A. Miroshnichenko verfasserin aut T. V. Sviridova verfasserin aut E. A. Motina verfasserin aut O. S. Korneeva verfasserin aut In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 (DE-627)88565837X (DE-600)2893302-3 23101202 nnns volume:79 year:2018 number:4 pages:220-226 https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac kostenfrei https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 79 2018 4 220-226
language	Russian
source	In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 volume:79 year:2018 number:4 pages:220-226
sourceStr	In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий 79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226 volume:79 year:2018 number:4 pages:220-226
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage Food processing and manufacture
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий
authorswithroles_txt_mv	S. V. Pavlenkova @@aut@@ G. P. Shuvaeva @@aut@@ L. A. Miroshnichenko @@aut@@ T. V. Sviridova @@aut@@ E. A. Motina @@aut@@ O. S. Korneeva @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	88565837X
id	DOAJ022151346
language_de	russisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022151346</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307053923.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022151346</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. V. Pavlenkova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G. P. Shuvaeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">L. A. Miroshnichenko</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T. V. Sviridova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E. A. Motina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O. S. Korneeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий</subfield><subfield code="d">Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)88565837X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2893302-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23101202</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:79</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:220-226</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">79</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">220-226</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	S. V. Pavlenkova
spellingShingle	S. V. Pavlenkova misc TP368-456 misc silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage misc Food processing and manufacture Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage
authorStr	S. V. Pavlenkova
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)88565837X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TP368-456
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	23101202
topic_title	TP368-456 Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage
topic	misc TP368-456 misc silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage misc Food processing and manufacture
topic_unstemmed	misc TP368-456 misc silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage misc Food processing and manufacture
topic_browse	misc TP368-456 misc silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage misc Food processing and manufacture
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий
hierarchy_parent_id	88565837X
hierarchy_top_title	Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)88565837X (DE-600)2893302-3
title	Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ022151346 (DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac
title_full	Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage
author_sort	S. V. Pavlenkova
journal	Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий
journalStr	Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	rus
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2018
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	220
author_browse	S. V. Pavlenkova G. P. Shuvaeva L. A. Miroshnichenko T. V. Sviridova E. A. Motina O. S. Korneeva
container_volume	79
class	TP368-456
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	S. V. Pavlenkova
doi_str_mv	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage
callnumber	TP368-456
title_auth	Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage
abstract	Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage.
abstractGer	Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage.
abstract_unstemmed	Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage
url	https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226 https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671 https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202
remote_bool	true
author2	G. P. Shuvaeva L. A. Miroshnichenko T. V. Sviridova E. A. Motina O. S. Korneeva
author2Str	G. P. Shuvaeva L. A. Miroshnichenko T. V. Sviridova E. A. Motina O. S. Korneeva
ppnlink	88565837X
callnumber-subject	TP - Chemical Technology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226
callnumber-a	TP368-456
up_date	2024-07-04T00:25:00.962Z
_version_	1803605980964978689
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022151346</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307053923.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022151346</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. V. Pavlenkova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silage is the main juicy food and a source of vitamins for animals in the winter-stall period. In order to expand the range of forage crops for the production of high – protein silage in the work used non-traditional forage culture amaranth, which is the content of protein balanced by the number of essential amino acids (especially lysine, methionine and tryptophanus), oils, micro – and macro-elements, vitamins and biologically active substances far superior to traditional forage plants, including legumes. Amaranth belongs to the group of plants hard-ensilage because the level of sugar in its green mass does not exceed the minimum required for the silage process, but the use of starter cultures, contributing to the creation of optimal conditions for the normal flow of fermentation processes, can solve this problem. The comparative characteristic of qualitative indicators of a silo from amaranth paniculate and from maize as raw materials of the most widespread for preparation of green forages is carried out in work. It is established that in the phase of milk-wax ripeness of seeds amaranth has the best technological properties for silage harvesting, as the total loss of nutrients in the silage of amaranth in this phase is minimal. The content of "raw" protein, which is an important indicator in the conditions of protein deficiency in traditional fodder crops, in the amaranth silage of paniculata is almost 2 times higher than in the corn silage. Based on the evaluation of the quality of silage on dry matter content, organic acids, crude protein, degree of acidity and organoleptic indicators it can be concluded that the silage of amaranth is more balanced in terms of key indicators of quality compared to corn silage.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">silage, amaranth, amaranth silage, corn silage, quality indicators of silage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G. P. Shuvaeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">L. A. Miroshnichenko</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T. V. Sviridova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E. A. Motina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O. S. Korneeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий</subfield><subfield code="d">Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">79(2018), 4, Seite 220-226</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)88565837X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2893302-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23101202</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:79</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:220-226</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-4-220-226</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6b1c008d783e4d3fa4a915f203a4a4ac</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.vestnik-vsuet.ru/vguit/article/view/1671</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2226-910X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2310-1202</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">79</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">220-226</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400708

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparative characteristics of qualitative indicators of amaranth and corn silage

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?