Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential
This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Anca Hulea [verfasserIn] Diana Obiștioiu [verfasserIn] Ileana Cocan [verfasserIn] Ersilia Alexa [verfasserIn] Monica Negrea [verfasserIn] Alina-Georgeta Neacșu [verfasserIn] Călin Hulea [verfasserIn] Corina Pascu [verfasserIn] Luminita Costinar [verfasserIn] Ionica Iancu [verfasserIn] Emil Tîrziu [verfasserIn] Viorel Herman [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Antibiotics - MDPI AG, 2013, 11(2022), 5, p 595 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2022 ; number:5, p 595 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ022346546 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ022346546 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414223343.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/antibiotics11050595 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ022346546 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RM1-950 | |
100 | 0 | |a Anca Hulea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. | ||
650 | 4 | |a honey | |
650 | 4 | |a antimicrobial activity | |
650 | 4 | |a antioxidants | |
650 | 4 | |a manuka honey | |
650 | 4 | |a acacia honey | |
650 | 4 | |a linden honey | |
653 | 0 | |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology | |
700 | 0 | |a Diana Obiștioiu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ileana Cocan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ersilia Alexa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Monica Negrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Alina-Georgeta Neacșu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Călin Hulea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Corina Pascu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Luminita Costinar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ionica Iancu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Emil Tîrziu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Viorel Herman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Antibiotics |d MDPI AG, 2013 |g 11(2022), 5, p 595 |w (DE-627)726120596 |w (DE-600)2681345-2 |x 20796382 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2022 |g number:5, p 595 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2022 |e 5, p 595 |
author_variant |
a h ah d o do i c ic e a ea m n mn a g n agn c h ch c p cp l c lc i i ii e t et v h vh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20796382:2022----::iestomnfoahnyaeoteniirbaadn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RM |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022346546 (DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 Anca Hulea verfasserin aut Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. honey antimicrobial activity antioxidants manuka honey acacia honey linden honey Therapeutics. Pharmacology Diana Obiștioiu verfasserin aut Ileana Cocan verfasserin aut Ersilia Alexa verfasserin aut Monica Negrea verfasserin aut Alina-Georgeta Neacșu verfasserin aut Călin Hulea verfasserin aut Corina Pascu verfasserin aut Luminita Costinar verfasserin aut Ionica Iancu verfasserin aut Emil Tîrziu verfasserin aut Viorel Herman verfasserin aut In Antibiotics MDPI AG, 2013 11(2022), 5, p 595 (DE-627)726120596 (DE-600)2681345-2 20796382 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:5, p 595 https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 5, p 595 |
spelling |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022346546 (DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 Anca Hulea verfasserin aut Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. honey antimicrobial activity antioxidants manuka honey acacia honey linden honey Therapeutics. Pharmacology Diana Obiștioiu verfasserin aut Ileana Cocan verfasserin aut Ersilia Alexa verfasserin aut Monica Negrea verfasserin aut Alina-Georgeta Neacșu verfasserin aut Călin Hulea verfasserin aut Corina Pascu verfasserin aut Luminita Costinar verfasserin aut Ionica Iancu verfasserin aut Emil Tîrziu verfasserin aut Viorel Herman verfasserin aut In Antibiotics MDPI AG, 2013 11(2022), 5, p 595 (DE-627)726120596 (DE-600)2681345-2 20796382 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:5, p 595 https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 5, p 595 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022346546 (DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 Anca Hulea verfasserin aut Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. honey antimicrobial activity antioxidants manuka honey acacia honey linden honey Therapeutics. Pharmacology Diana Obiștioiu verfasserin aut Ileana Cocan verfasserin aut Ersilia Alexa verfasserin aut Monica Negrea verfasserin aut Alina-Georgeta Neacșu verfasserin aut Călin Hulea verfasserin aut Corina Pascu verfasserin aut Luminita Costinar verfasserin aut Ionica Iancu verfasserin aut Emil Tîrziu verfasserin aut Viorel Herman verfasserin aut In Antibiotics MDPI AG, 2013 11(2022), 5, p 595 (DE-627)726120596 (DE-600)2681345-2 20796382 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:5, p 595 https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 5, p 595 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022346546 (DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 Anca Hulea verfasserin aut Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. honey antimicrobial activity antioxidants manuka honey acacia honey linden honey Therapeutics. Pharmacology Diana Obiștioiu verfasserin aut Ileana Cocan verfasserin aut Ersilia Alexa verfasserin aut Monica Negrea verfasserin aut Alina-Georgeta Neacșu verfasserin aut Călin Hulea verfasserin aut Corina Pascu verfasserin aut Luminita Costinar verfasserin aut Ionica Iancu verfasserin aut Emil Tîrziu verfasserin aut Viorel Herman verfasserin aut In Antibiotics MDPI AG, 2013 11(2022), 5, p 595 (DE-627)726120596 (DE-600)2681345-2 20796382 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:5, p 595 https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 5, p 595 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022346546 (DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 Anca Hulea verfasserin aut Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. honey antimicrobial activity antioxidants manuka honey acacia honey linden honey Therapeutics. Pharmacology Diana Obiștioiu verfasserin aut Ileana Cocan verfasserin aut Ersilia Alexa verfasserin aut Monica Negrea verfasserin aut Alina-Georgeta Neacșu verfasserin aut Călin Hulea verfasserin aut Corina Pascu verfasserin aut Luminita Costinar verfasserin aut Ionica Iancu verfasserin aut Emil Tîrziu verfasserin aut Viorel Herman verfasserin aut In Antibiotics MDPI AG, 2013 11(2022), 5, p 595 (DE-627)726120596 (DE-600)2681345-2 20796382 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:5, p 595 https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 5, p 595 |
language |
English |
source |
In Antibiotics 11(2022), 5, p 595 volume:11 year:2022 number:5, p 595 |
sourceStr |
In Antibiotics 11(2022), 5, p 595 volume:11 year:2022 number:5, p 595 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
honey antimicrobial activity antioxidants manuka honey acacia honey linden honey Therapeutics. Pharmacology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Antibiotics |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Anca Hulea @@aut@@ Diana Obiștioiu @@aut@@ Ileana Cocan @@aut@@ Ersilia Alexa @@aut@@ Monica Negrea @@aut@@ Alina-Georgeta Neacșu @@aut@@ Călin Hulea @@aut@@ Corina Pascu @@aut@@ Luminita Costinar @@aut@@ Ionica Iancu @@aut@@ Emil Tîrziu @@aut@@ Viorel Herman @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
726120596 |
id |
DOAJ022346546 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022346546</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414223343.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/antibiotics11050595</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022346546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RM1-950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anca Hulea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antimicrobial activity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antioxidants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">manuka honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acacia honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">linden honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Therapeutics. Pharmacology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diana Obiștioiu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ileana Cocan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ersilia Alexa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Monica Negrea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alina-Georgeta Neacșu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Călin Hulea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corina Pascu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luminita Costinar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ionica Iancu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emil Tîrziu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Viorel Herman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Antibiotics</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2022), 5, p 595</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)726120596</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2681345-2</subfield><subfield code="x">20796382</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 595</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 595</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Anca Hulea |
spellingShingle |
Anca Hulea misc RM1-950 misc honey misc antimicrobial activity misc antioxidants misc manuka honey misc acacia honey misc linden honey misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential |
authorStr |
Anca Hulea |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)726120596 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RM1-950 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20796382 |
topic_title |
RM1-950 Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential honey antimicrobial activity antioxidants manuka honey acacia honey linden honey |
topic |
misc RM1-950 misc honey misc antimicrobial activity misc antioxidants misc manuka honey misc acacia honey misc linden honey misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RM1-950 misc honey misc antimicrobial activity misc antioxidants misc manuka honey misc acacia honey misc linden honey misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology |
topic_browse |
misc RM1-950 misc honey misc antimicrobial activity misc antioxidants misc manuka honey misc acacia honey misc linden honey misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Antibiotics |
hierarchy_parent_id |
726120596 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Antibiotics |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)726120596 (DE-600)2681345-2 |
title |
Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ022346546 (DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 |
title_full |
Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential |
author_sort |
Anca Hulea |
journal |
Antibiotics |
journalStr |
Antibiotics |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Anca Hulea Diana Obiștioiu Ileana Cocan Ersilia Alexa Monica Negrea Alina-Georgeta Neacșu Călin Hulea Corina Pascu Luminita Costinar Ionica Iancu Emil Tîrziu Viorel Herman |
container_volume |
11 |
class |
RM1-950 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Anca Hulea |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
diversity of monofloral honey based on the antimicrobial and antioxidant potential |
callnumber |
RM1-950 |
title_auth |
Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential |
abstract |
This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. |
abstractGer |
This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
5, p 595 |
title_short |
Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595 https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615 https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595 https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Diana Obiștioiu Ileana Cocan Ersilia Alexa Monica Negrea Alina-Georgeta Neacșu Călin Hulea Corina Pascu Luminita Costinar Ionica Iancu Emil Tîrziu Viorel Herman |
author2Str |
Diana Obiștioiu Ileana Cocan Ersilia Alexa Monica Negrea Alina-Georgeta Neacșu Călin Hulea Corina Pascu Luminita Costinar Ionica Iancu Emil Tîrziu Viorel Herman |
ppnlink |
726120596 |
callnumber-subject |
RM - Therapeutics and Pharmacology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/antibiotics11050595 |
callnumber-a |
RM1-950 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T01:10:22.523Z |
_version_ |
1803608834730622976 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022346546</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414223343.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/antibiotics11050595</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022346546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RM1-950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anca Hulea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diversity of Monofloral Honey Based on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant profile and the antimicrobial activity of four different types of monofloral honey (manuka (MH), brassica rapeseed (BH), acacia (AH), and linden honey (LH)) against some bacterial/fungal ATCC strains and some multidrug-resistant strains isolated from chronic otitis in dogs. For the characterisation of the antioxidant profile of each honey, we extracted the honey samples by hydroalcoholic extraction and analysed them in terms of total polyphenols (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) using the spectrophotometric method. The antimicrobial activity was determined using the microdilution method at concentrations of 10%, 15%, and 20%, with the results expressed in OD (optical density) calculated as BIR% (bacterial inhibition rate)/MIR% (mycelial inhibition rate). The antioxidant characterisation of the analysed honey samples showed the highest antioxidant activity and concentrations of TPC and TFC in MH, followed by LH. MH was proven to be the most effective on most clinical isolates concerning the antimicrobial activity in comparison with BH, AH, and LH. Except for <i<B. cepacia</i< and <i<P. vulgaris</i<, all the clinical isolates were sensitive to the antibacterial activity of honey. Regarding the ATCC strains, MH 10% was the most effective in inhibiting all the strains tested except for <i<P. aeruginosa.</i< In conclusion, the efficacy classification in our study was MH < BH < AH < LH.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antimicrobial activity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antioxidants</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">manuka honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acacia honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">linden honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Therapeutics. Pharmacology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diana Obiștioiu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ileana Cocan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ersilia Alexa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Monica Negrea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alina-Georgeta Neacșu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Călin Hulea</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corina Pascu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luminita Costinar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ionica Iancu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emil Tîrziu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Viorel Herman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Antibiotics</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2022), 5, p 595</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)726120596</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2681345-2</subfield><subfield code="x">20796382</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 595</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050595</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/525e6c3303bb4993adda4239d8911615</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/595</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 595</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399272 |