Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening

This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Paolo Conti [verfasserIn] Giovanni Lutzemberger [verfasserIn] Eva Schito [verfasserIn] Davide Poli [verfasserIn] Daniele Testi [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Energies - MDPI AG, 2008, 12(2019), 15, p 3026
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:12 ; year:2019 ; number:15, p 3026

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/en12153026

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ022755489

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ022755489
003	DE-627
005	20230307061123.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/en12153026 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ022755489
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Paolo Conti \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion.
650		4	\|a hybrid renewable energy systems
650		4	\|a off-grid buildings
650		4	\|a electrochemical storage
650		4	\|a dynamic simulation
650		4	\|a multi-objective optimization
650		4	\|a screening design methodology
650		4	\|a solar technologies
653		0	\|a Technology
653		0	\|a T
700	0		\|a Giovanni Lutzemberger \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Eva Schito \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Davide Poli \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Daniele Testi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Energies \|d MDPI AG, 2008 \|g 12(2019), 15, p 3026 \|w (DE-627)572083742 \|w (DE-600)2437446-5 \|x 19961073 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:12 \|g year:2019 \|g number:15, p 3026
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 12 \|j 2019 \|e 15, p 3026

Indexfelder

author_variant	p c pc g l gl e s es d p dp d t dt
matchkey_str	article:19961073:2019----::utojciepiiainffgihbirnwbenryytmibidnsih
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.3390/en12153026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022755489 (DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paolo Conti verfasserin aut Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion. hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies Technology T Giovanni Lutzemberger verfasserin aut Eva Schito verfasserin aut Davide Poli verfasserin aut Daniele Testi verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 12(2019), 15, p 3026 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:15, p 3026 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2019 15, p 3026
spelling	10.3390/en12153026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022755489 (DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paolo Conti verfasserin aut Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion. hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies Technology T Giovanni Lutzemberger verfasserin aut Eva Schito verfasserin aut Davide Poli verfasserin aut Daniele Testi verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 12(2019), 15, p 3026 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:15, p 3026 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2019 15, p 3026
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/en12153026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022755489 (DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paolo Conti verfasserin aut Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion. hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies Technology T Giovanni Lutzemberger verfasserin aut Eva Schito verfasserin aut Davide Poli verfasserin aut Daniele Testi verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 12(2019), 15, p 3026 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:15, p 3026 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2019 15, p 3026
allfieldsGer	10.3390/en12153026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022755489 (DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paolo Conti verfasserin aut Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion. hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies Technology T Giovanni Lutzemberger verfasserin aut Eva Schito verfasserin aut Davide Poli verfasserin aut Daniele Testi verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 12(2019), 15, p 3026 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:15, p 3026 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2019 15, p 3026
allfieldsSound	10.3390/en12153026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ022755489 (DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paolo Conti verfasserin aut Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion. hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies Technology T Giovanni Lutzemberger verfasserin aut Eva Schito verfasserin aut Davide Poli verfasserin aut Daniele Testi verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 12(2019), 15, p 3026 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:15, p 3026 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2019 15, p 3026
language	English
source	In Energies 12(2019), 15, p 3026 volume:12 year:2019 number:15, p 3026
sourceStr	In Energies 12(2019), 15, p 3026 volume:12 year:2019 number:15, p 3026
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies Technology T
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Energies
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Paolo Conti @@aut@@ Giovanni Lutzemberger @@aut@@ Eva Schito @@aut@@ Davide Poli @@aut@@ Daniele Testi @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	572083742
id	DOAJ022755489
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022755489</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307061123.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/en12153026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022755489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paolo Conti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hybrid renewable energy systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">off-grid buildings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">electrochemical storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dynamic simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-objective optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">screening design methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">solar technologies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giovanni Lutzemberger</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eva Schito</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Davide Poli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Testi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Energies</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2019), 15, p 3026</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)572083742</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2437446-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19961073</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:15, p 3026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">15, p 3026</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Paolo Conti
spellingShingle	Paolo Conti misc hybrid renewable energy systems misc off-grid buildings misc electrochemical storage misc dynamic simulation misc multi-objective optimization misc screening design methodology misc solar technologies misc Technology misc T Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening
authorStr	Paolo Conti
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)572083742
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	19961073
topic_title	Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening hybrid renewable energy systems off-grid buildings electrochemical storage dynamic simulation multi-objective optimization screening design methodology solar technologies
topic	misc hybrid renewable energy systems misc off-grid buildings misc electrochemical storage misc dynamic simulation misc multi-objective optimization misc screening design methodology misc solar technologies misc Technology misc T
topic_unstemmed	misc hybrid renewable energy systems misc off-grid buildings misc electrochemical storage misc dynamic simulation misc multi-objective optimization misc screening design methodology misc solar technologies misc Technology misc T
topic_browse	misc hybrid renewable energy systems misc off-grid buildings misc electrochemical storage misc dynamic simulation misc multi-objective optimization misc screening design methodology misc solar technologies misc Technology misc T
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Energies
hierarchy_parent_id	572083742
hierarchy_top_title	Energies
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5
title	Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ022755489 (DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36
title_full	Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening
author_sort	Paolo Conti
journal	Energies
journalStr	Energies
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Paolo Conti Giovanni Lutzemberger Eva Schito Davide Poli Daniele Testi
container_volume	12
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Paolo Conti
doi_str_mv	10.3390/en12153026
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	multi-objective optimization of off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems in buildings with prior design-variable screening
title_auth	Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening
abstract	This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion.
abstractGer	This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion.
abstract_unstemmed	This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	15, p 3026
title_short	Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026 https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36 https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026 https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073
remote_bool	true
author2	Giovanni Lutzemberger Eva Schito Davide Poli Daniele Testi
author2Str	Giovanni Lutzemberger Eva Schito Davide Poli Daniele Testi
ppnlink	572083742
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/en12153026
up_date	2024-07-03T13:50:52.130Z
_version_	1803566083881304064
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ022755489</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307061123.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/en12153026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ022755489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paolo Conti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This work presents an optimization strategy and the cost-optimal design of an off-grid building served by an energy system involving solar technologies, thermal and electrochemical storages. Independently from the multi-objective method (e.g., utility function) and algorithm used (e.g., genetic algorithms), the optimization of this kind of systems is typically characterized by a high-dimensional variables space, computational effort and results uncertainty (e.g., local minimum solutions). Instead of focusing on advanced optimization tools to handle the design problem, the dimension of the full problem has been reduced, only considering the design variables with a high “effect” on the objective functions. An off-grid accommodation building is presented as test case: the original six-variable design problem consisting of about 300,000 possible configurations is reduced to a two-variable problem, after the analysis of 870 Monte Carlo simulations. The new problem includes only 220 possible design alternatives with a clear benefit for the multi-objective optimization algorithm. The energy-economy Pareto frontiers obtained by the original and the reduced problems overlap, showing the validity of the proposed methodology. The <i<No-RES</i< (no renewable energy sources) primary energy consumption can be reduced up to almost 0 kWh/(m<sup<2</sup<yr) and the net present value (<i<NPV</i<) after 20 years can reach 70 k€ depending on the number of photovoltaic panels and electrochemical storage size. The reduction of the problem also allows for a plain analysis of the results and the drawing of handy decision charts to help the investor/designer in finding the best design according to the specific investment availability and target performances. The configurations on the Pareto frontier are characterized by a notable electrical overproduction and a ratio between the two main design variables that goes from 4 to 8 h. A sensitivity analysis to the unitary price of the electrochemical storage reveals the robustness of the sizing criterion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hybrid renewable energy systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">off-grid buildings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">electrochemical storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dynamic simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-objective optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">screening design methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">solar technologies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giovanni Lutzemberger</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eva Schito</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Davide Poli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Testi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Energies</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2019), 15, p 3026</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)572083742</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2437446-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19961073</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:15, p 3026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/en12153026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/441ade427c6f42e599b80913e5e71b36</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/15/3026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">15, p 3026</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401005

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Multi-Objective Optimization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings with Prior Design-Variable Screening

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?