Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order
Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
O. R. Young [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право - Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018, 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:2019 ; number:5 ; pages:6-24 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ023037636 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ023037636 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413102424.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ023037636 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a rus | ||
050 | 0 | |a JZ2-6530 | |
100 | 0 | |a O. R. Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. | ||
650 | 4 | |a arctic council | |
650 | 4 | |a arctic 5 | |
650 | 4 | |a arctic 8 | |
650 | 4 | |a non-arctic states | |
650 | 4 | |a arctic region | |
650 | 4 | |a diplomacy | |
650 | 4 | |a foreign policy | |
653 | 0 | |a International relations | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |d Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018 |g 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 |w (DE-627)1760622796 |x 25879324 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2019 |g number:5 |g pages:6-24 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2019 |e 5 |h 6-24 |
author_variant |
o r y ory |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:25879324:2019----::osrcighnwrtchftroteicmoanrhn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
callnumber-subject-code |
JZ |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ023037636 (DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 O. R. Young verfasserin aut Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. arctic council arctic 5 arctic 8 non-arctic states arctic region diplomacy foreign policy International relations In Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 (DE-627)1760622796 25879324 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:5 pages:6-24 https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 kostenfrei https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 5 6-24 |
spelling |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ023037636 (DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 O. R. Young verfasserin aut Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. arctic council arctic 5 arctic 8 non-arctic states arctic region diplomacy foreign policy International relations In Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 (DE-627)1760622796 25879324 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:5 pages:6-24 https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 kostenfrei https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 5 6-24 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ023037636 (DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 O. R. Young verfasserin aut Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. arctic council arctic 5 arctic 8 non-arctic states arctic region diplomacy foreign policy International relations In Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 (DE-627)1760622796 25879324 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:5 pages:6-24 https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 kostenfrei https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 5 6-24 |
allfieldsGer |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ023037636 (DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 O. R. Young verfasserin aut Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. arctic council arctic 5 arctic 8 non-arctic states arctic region diplomacy foreign policy International relations In Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 (DE-627)1760622796 25879324 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:5 pages:6-24 https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 kostenfrei https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 5 6-24 |
allfieldsSound |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ023037636 (DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 O. R. Young verfasserin aut Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. arctic council arctic 5 arctic 8 non-arctic states arctic region diplomacy foreign policy International relations In Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 (DE-627)1760622796 25879324 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:5 pages:6-24 https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 kostenfrei https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 5 6-24 |
language |
English Russian |
source |
In Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 volume:12 year:2019 number:5 pages:6-24 |
sourceStr |
In Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право 12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24 volume:12 year:2019 number:5 pages:6-24 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
arctic council arctic 5 arctic 8 non-arctic states arctic region diplomacy foreign policy International relations |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
O. R. Young @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760622796 |
id |
DOAJ023037636 |
language_de |
englisch russisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ023037636</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413102424.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ023037636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O. R. Young</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic council</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic 5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic 8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-arctic states</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic region</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diplomacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">foreign policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право</subfield><subfield code="d">Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760622796</subfield><subfield code="x">25879324</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6-24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">6-24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
author |
O. R. Young |
spellingShingle |
O. R. Young misc JZ2-6530 misc arctic council misc arctic 5 misc arctic 8 misc non-arctic states misc arctic region misc diplomacy misc foreign policy misc International relations Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order |
authorStr |
O. R. Young |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760622796 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
JZ2-6530 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
25879324 |
topic_title |
JZ2-6530 Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order arctic council arctic 5 arctic 8 non-arctic states arctic region diplomacy foreign policy |
topic |
misc JZ2-6530 misc arctic council misc arctic 5 misc arctic 8 misc non-arctic states misc arctic region misc diplomacy misc foreign policy misc International relations |
topic_unstemmed |
misc JZ2-6530 misc arctic council misc arctic 5 misc arctic 8 misc non-arctic states misc arctic region misc diplomacy misc foreign policy misc International relations |
topic_browse |
misc JZ2-6530 misc arctic council misc arctic 5 misc arctic 8 misc non-arctic states misc arctic region misc diplomacy misc foreign policy misc International relations |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760622796 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760622796 |
title |
Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ023037636 (DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 |
title_full |
Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order |
author_sort |
O. R. Young |
journal |
Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |
journalStr |
Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право |
callnumber-first-code |
J |
lang_code |
eng rus |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
6 |
author_browse |
O. R. Young |
container_volume |
12 |
class |
JZ2-6530 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
O. R. Young |
doi_str_mv |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 |
title_sort |
constructing the “new” arctic: the future of the circumpolar north in a changing global order |
callnumber |
JZ2-6530 |
title_auth |
Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order |
abstract |
Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. |
abstractGer |
Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order |
url |
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0 https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524 https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240 https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1760622796 |
callnumber-subject |
JZ - International Relations |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24 |
callnumber-a |
JZ2-6530 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:24:06.090Z |
_version_ |
1803571949571407872 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ023037636</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413102424.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ023037636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O. R. Young</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constructing the “New” Arctic: The Future of the Circumpolar North in a Changing Global Order</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Like all spatially delimited regions in international society, the Arctic is socially constructed. Political and economic considerations play prominent roles as determinants of the region’s boundaries, the identity of those states regarded as Arctic states, and the nature of the interactions between the Arctic and the outside world. From this perspective the recent history of the Arctic divides into two distinct periods: the late 1980s through 2007 and 2007 to the present. As the cold war faded, the Arctic became a peripheral region of declining importance in global political calculations. No one challenged the dominance of the eight Arctic states in regional affairs, and the Arctic Council focused on regional concerns relating to environmental protection and sus tainable development. Today, by contrast, the ‘new’ Arctic is a focus of intense glo bal interest, largely because climate change is proceeding more rapidly in this region than anywhere else on Earth with global consequences and because the increasing accessibility of the Arctic’s natural resources has generated enhanced interest on the part of outside actors. As a result, Arctic issues have merged into global issues, making the region a prominent arena for the interplay of geopolitical forces. Cooperative arrangements established during the first period (e.g. the Arctic Council) may require adjustment to operate effectively in the ‘new’ Arctic. Treated as a case study, the Arctic story provides an illuminating lens through which to analyze the forces that shape thinking about the nature of regions in international society and the role of cooperative arrangements at the regional level.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic council</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic 5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic 8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-arctic states</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">arctic region</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diplomacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">foreign policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право</subfield><subfield code="d">Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”), 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2019), 5, Seite 6-24</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760622796</subfield><subfield code="x">25879324</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6-24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-6-24</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3c6e3f1a74f648268c21cdfac4a879c0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/524</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">6-24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4002275 |