Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere

The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Petrović Vladimir [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Deutsch ; Englisch ; srp

Erschienen:	2007

Schlagwörter:	The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Filozofija i Društvo - Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010, 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:18 ; year:2007 ; number:3 ; pages:103-116

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.2298/FID0703103P

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ024525146

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ024525146
003	DE-627
005	20230307074947.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c
024	7		\|a 10.2298/FID0703103P \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ024525146
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a ger \|a eng \|a srp
050		0	\|a B1-5802
100	0		\|a Petrović Vladimir \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere
264		1	\|c 2007
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.
650		4	\|a The Hague Tribunal
650		4	\|a expert witnessing
650		4	\|a the trial of Slobodan Milosevic
650		4	\|a methodology of social sciences
653		0	\|a Philosophy (General)
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Filozofija i Društvo \|d Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 \|g 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 \|w (DE-627)486183955 \|w (DE-600)2187033-0 \|x 23348577 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:18 \|g year:2007 \|g number:3 \|g pages:103-116
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_374
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2863
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 18 \|j 2007 \|e 3 \|h 103-116

Indexfelder

author_variant	p v pv
matchkey_str	article:23348577:2007----::oilcetsssxetinseiteaut
hierarchy_sort_str	2007
callnumber-subject-code	B
publishDate	2007
allfields	10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116
spelling	10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116
allfields_unstemmed	10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116
allfieldsGer	10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116
allfieldsSound	10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116
language	German English
source	In Filozofija i Društvo 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116
sourceStr	In Filozofija i Društvo 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Filozofija i Društvo
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Petrović Vladimir @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2007-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	486183955
id	DOAJ024525146
language_de	deutsch englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ024525146</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307074947.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ024525146</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petrović Vladimir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Hague Tribunal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expert witnessing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the trial of Slobodan Milosevic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methodology of social sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Filozofija i Društvo</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)486183955</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2187033-0</subfield><subfield code="x">23348577</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:103-116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">103-116</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion
author	Petrović Vladimir
spellingShingle	Petrović Vladimir misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General) Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere
authorStr	Petrović Vladimir
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)486183955
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	B1-5802
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	23348577
topic_title	B1-5802 Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences
topic	misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General)
topic_browse	misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Filozofija i Društvo
hierarchy_parent_id	486183955
hierarchy_top_title	Filozofija i Društvo
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0
title	Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a
title_full	Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere
author_sort	Petrović Vladimir
journal	Filozofija i Društvo
journalStr	Filozofija i Društvo
callnumber-first-code	B
lang_code	ger eng srp
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2007
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	103
author_browse	Petrović Vladimir
container_volume	18
class	B1-5802
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Petrović Vladimir
doi_str_mv	10.2298/FID0703103P
title_sort	social scientists as expert witnesses in the hague tribunal and elsewhere
callnumber	B1-5802
title_auth	Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere
abstract	The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.
abstractGer	The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.
abstract_unstemmed	The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere
url	https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	486183955
callnumber-subject	B - Philosophy
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.2298/FID0703103P
callnumber-a	B1-5802
up_date	2024-07-03T23:19:47.090Z
_version_	1803601876972732416
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ024525146</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307074947.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ024525146</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petrović Vladimir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Hague Tribunal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expert witnessing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the trial of Slobodan Milosevic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methodology of social sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Filozofija i Društvo</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)486183955</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2187033-0</subfield><subfield code="x">23348577</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:103-116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">103-116</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401063

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?