Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere
The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Petrović Vladimir [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Deutsch ; Englisch ; srp |
Erschienen: |
2007 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Filozofija i Društvo - Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010, 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:18 ; year:2007 ; number:3 ; pages:103-116 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.2298/FID0703103P |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ024525146 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ024525146 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307074947.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2298/FID0703103P |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a ger |a eng |a srp | ||
050 | 0 | |a B1-5802 | |
100 | 0 | |a Petrović Vladimir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. | ||
650 | 4 | |a The Hague Tribunal | |
650 | 4 | |a expert witnessing | |
650 | 4 | |a the trial of Slobodan Milosevic | |
650 | 4 | |a methodology of social sciences | |
653 | 0 | |a Philosophy (General) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Filozofija i Društvo |d Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 |g 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 |w (DE-627)486183955 |w (DE-600)2187033-0 |x 23348577 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2007 |g number:3 |g pages:103-116 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_374 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2863 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 18 |j 2007 |e 3 |h 103-116 |
author_variant |
p v pv |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:23348577:2007----::oilcetsssxetinseiteaut |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2007 |
callnumber-subject-code |
B |
publishDate |
2007 |
allfields |
10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116 |
spelling |
10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116 |
allfieldsGer |
10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116 |
allfieldsSound |
10.2298/FID0703103P doi (DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng srp B1-5802 Petrović Vladimir verfasserin aut Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) In Filozofija i Društvo Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 (DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 23348577 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2007 3 103-116 |
language |
German English |
source |
In Filozofija i Društvo 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 |
sourceStr |
In Filozofija i Društvo 18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116 volume:18 year:2007 number:3 pages:103-116 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences Philosophy (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Filozofija i Društvo |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Petrović Vladimir @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
486183955 |
id |
DOAJ024525146 |
language_de |
deutsch englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ024525146</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307074947.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ024525146</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petrović Vladimir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Hague Tribunal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expert witnessing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the trial of Slobodan Milosevic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methodology of social sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Filozofija i Društvo</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)486183955</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2187033-0</subfield><subfield code="x">23348577</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:103-116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">103-116</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
author |
Petrović Vladimir |
spellingShingle |
Petrović Vladimir misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General) Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere |
authorStr |
Petrović Vladimir |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)486183955 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
B1-5802 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
23348577 |
topic_title |
B1-5802 Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere The Hague Tribunal expert witnessing the trial of Slobodan Milosevic methodology of social sciences |
topic |
misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General) |
topic_browse |
misc B1-5802 misc The Hague Tribunal misc expert witnessing misc the trial of Slobodan Milosevic misc methodology of social sciences misc Philosophy (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Filozofija i Društvo |
hierarchy_parent_id |
486183955 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Filozofija i Društvo |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)486183955 (DE-600)2187033-0 |
title |
Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ024525146 (DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a |
title_full |
Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere |
author_sort |
Petrović Vladimir |
journal |
Filozofija i Društvo |
journalStr |
Filozofija i Društvo |
callnumber-first-code |
B |
lang_code |
ger eng srp |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2007 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
103 |
author_browse |
Petrović Vladimir |
container_volume |
18 |
class |
B1-5802 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Petrović Vladimir |
doi_str_mv |
10.2298/FID0703103P |
title_sort |
social scientists as expert witnesses in the hague tribunal and elsewhere |
callnumber |
B1-5802 |
title_auth |
Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere |
abstract |
The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. |
abstractGer |
The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
486183955 |
callnumber-subject |
B - Philosophy |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.2298/FID0703103P |
callnumber-a |
B1-5802 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:19:47.090Z |
_version_ |
1803601876972732416 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ024525146</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307074947.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ024525146</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petrović Vladimir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social scientists as expert witnesses in The Hague Tribunal and elsewhere</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article analyses the role of social scientists as expert witnesses in the ICTY, whose contribution is assessed in the light of the long development of this practice. Wider discussion on the courtroom usage of scientific knowledge is evoked in order to emphasize the problems in regulation of expert witnessing. Differing mechanisms set to ensure the scientific reliability and legal relevance of the contribution of experts is analyzed in different legal contexts and in different scholarly disciplines. Regulation of expert witnessing in The Hague tribunal is perceived as specific solution whose consequences are tracked through the role of experts in the trials and through the public perception of this role. The goal of such approach is to nuance the dominant interpretations on the role of scholars in the Hague tribunal and to create the preconditions for understanding of the specific character of their role.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Hague Tribunal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expert witnessing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the trial of Slobodan Milosevic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methodology of social sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Filozofija i Društvo</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2007), 3, Seite 103-116</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)486183955</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2187033-0</subfield><subfield code="x">23348577</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:103-116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703103P</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/67fe3e06f2c14db0a1848c315279c97a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380703103P.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0353-5738</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">103-116</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401063 |