The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type
The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to de...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Demidenko. Y. [verfasserIn] Škrdla, P. [verfasserIn] Rácz, B. [verfasserIn] Nemergut, A. [verfasserIn] Béres, S. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Deutsch ; Englisch ; Französisch ; Rumänisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice - Editura Academiei Române, 2020, (2021), Seite 141-181 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2021 ; pages:141-181 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ025156934 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ025156934 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230501181905.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ025156934 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ger |a eng |a fre |a rum | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a CC1-960 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Demidenko. Y. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a carpathian basin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a early upper paleolithic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aurignacian industry types | |
| 650 | 4 | |a proto-aurignacian | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Archaeology | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Škrdla, P. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Rácz, B. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Nemergut, A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Béres, S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice |d Editura Academiei Române, 2020 |g (2021), Seite 141-181 |w (DE-627)DOAJ078636841 |x 00765147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2021 |g pages:141-181 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2021 |h 141-181 | ||
| author_variant |
d y dy p š pš b r br a n an s b sb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00765147:2021----::hargainnhcrahabsnfatrcnrluoenisrt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
CC |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025156934 (DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng fre rum CC1-960 Demidenko. Y. verfasserin aut The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme carpathian basin early upper paleolithic aurignacian industry types proto-aurignacian Archaeology Škrdla, P. verfasserin aut Rácz, B. verfasserin aut Nemergut, A. verfasserin aut Béres, S. verfasserin aut In Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice Editura Academiei Române, 2020 (2021), Seite 141-181 (DE-627)DOAJ078636841 00765147 nnns year:2021 pages:141-181 https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2021 141-181 |
| spelling |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025156934 (DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng fre rum CC1-960 Demidenko. Y. verfasserin aut The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme carpathian basin early upper paleolithic aurignacian industry types proto-aurignacian Archaeology Škrdla, P. verfasserin aut Rácz, B. verfasserin aut Nemergut, A. verfasserin aut Béres, S. verfasserin aut In Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice Editura Academiei Române, 2020 (2021), Seite 141-181 (DE-627)DOAJ078636841 00765147 nnns year:2021 pages:141-181 https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2021 141-181 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025156934 (DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng fre rum CC1-960 Demidenko. Y. verfasserin aut The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme carpathian basin early upper paleolithic aurignacian industry types proto-aurignacian Archaeology Škrdla, P. verfasserin aut Rácz, B. verfasserin aut Nemergut, A. verfasserin aut Béres, S. verfasserin aut In Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice Editura Academiei Române, 2020 (2021), Seite 141-181 (DE-627)DOAJ078636841 00765147 nnns year:2021 pages:141-181 https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2021 141-181 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025156934 (DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng fre rum CC1-960 Demidenko. Y. verfasserin aut The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme carpathian basin early upper paleolithic aurignacian industry types proto-aurignacian Archaeology Škrdla, P. verfasserin aut Rácz, B. verfasserin aut Nemergut, A. verfasserin aut Béres, S. verfasserin aut In Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice Editura Academiei Române, 2020 (2021), Seite 141-181 (DE-627)DOAJ078636841 00765147 nnns year:2021 pages:141-181 https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2021 141-181 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025156934 (DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng fre rum CC1-960 Demidenko. Y. verfasserin aut The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme carpathian basin early upper paleolithic aurignacian industry types proto-aurignacian Archaeology Škrdla, P. verfasserin aut Rácz, B. verfasserin aut Nemergut, A. verfasserin aut Béres, S. verfasserin aut In Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice Editura Academiei Române, 2020 (2021), Seite 141-181 (DE-627)DOAJ078636841 00765147 nnns year:2021 pages:141-181 https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2021 141-181 |
| language |
German English French Romanian |
| source |
In Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice (2021), Seite 141-181 year:2021 pages:141-181 |
| sourceStr |
In Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice (2021), Seite 141-181 year:2021 pages:141-181 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
carpathian basin early upper paleolithic aurignacian industry types proto-aurignacian Archaeology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Demidenko. Y. @@aut@@ Škrdla, P. @@aut@@ Rácz, B. @@aut@@ Nemergut, A. @@aut@@ Béres, S. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ078636841 |
| id |
DOAJ025156934 |
| language_de |
deutsch englisch franzoesisch rumaenisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ025156934</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501181905.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ025156934</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CC1-960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Demidenko. Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carpathian basin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">early upper paleolithic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aurignacian industry types</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">proto-aurignacian</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Archaeology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Škrdla, P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rácz, B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nemergut, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Béres, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice</subfield><subfield code="d">Editura Academiei Române, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">(2021), Seite 141-181</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078636841</subfield><subfield code="x">00765147</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:141-181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">141-181</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
C - Historical Sciences |
| author |
Demidenko. Y. |
| spellingShingle |
Demidenko. Y. misc CC1-960 misc carpathian basin misc early upper paleolithic misc aurignacian industry types misc proto-aurignacian misc Archaeology The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type |
| authorStr |
Demidenko. Y. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ078636841 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
CC1-960 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
00765147 |
| topic_title |
CC1-960 The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type carpathian basin early upper paleolithic aurignacian industry types proto-aurignacian |
| topic |
misc CC1-960 misc carpathian basin misc early upper paleolithic misc aurignacian industry types misc proto-aurignacian misc Archaeology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc CC1-960 misc carpathian basin misc early upper paleolithic misc aurignacian industry types misc proto-aurignacian misc Archaeology |
| topic_browse |
misc CC1-960 misc carpathian basin misc early upper paleolithic misc aurignacian industry types misc proto-aurignacian misc Archaeology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ078636841 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ078636841 |
| title |
The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ025156934 (DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e |
| title_full |
The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type |
| author_sort |
Demidenko. Y. |
| journal |
Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice |
| journalStr |
Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice |
| callnumber-first-code |
C |
| lang_code |
ger eng fre rum |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
141 |
| author_browse |
Demidenko. Y. Škrdla, P. Rácz, B. Nemergut, A. Béres, S. |
| class |
CC1-960 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Demidenko. Y. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
aurignacian in the carpathian basin of eastern central europe and its proto-aurignacian industry type |
| callnumber |
CC1-960 |
| title_auth |
The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type |
| abstract |
The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme |
| abstractGer |
The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Škrdla, P. Rácz, B. Nemergut, A. Béres, S. |
| author2Str |
Škrdla, P. Rácz, B. Nemergut, A. Béres, S. |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ078636841 |
| callnumber-subject |
CC - Archaeology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207 |
| callnumber-a |
CC1-960 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T13:17:39.258Z |
| _version_ |
1803563994199359488 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ025156934</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501181905.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ025156934</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CC1-960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Demidenko. Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Aurignacian in the Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article represents our first article in a series planned by us, with some more following articles on Aurignacian, its industry types and possible industrial-chronological variability for a large region in the heart of Europe, the Carpathian Basin, Eastern Central Europe. Our study proposes to define four Aurignacian industry types : Proto-Aurignacian/ Aurignacian 0 ; Early Aurignacian/ Aurignacian I ; Middle Aurignacian/ Aurignacian II ; Evolved Aurignacian with Góra Puławska II-type microliths. The present article is particularly devoted to Proto-Aurignacian sites and understanding its artefact complexity and variability. Certain attempts, based upon a number of artefact classification mistakes and their erroneous interpretations try to show that the Basin’s assemblages in the Banat (south of the Carpathian Basin) allegedly represent a mixture of Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian features composing an “ Aurignacian 0.5” industry ; we demonstrate in detail the proper Proto-Aurignacian industrial status for all the Basin’s sites and their finds, with some reservations for the Krems-Hundssteig site, Lower Austria. Moreover, the Carpathian Basin Proto-Aurignacian supports well the Aquitaine Aurignacian scheme. Some variability in the lithic assemblages is explained, in our view through the existence of various site types and their human activities, as it was established for the Ukrainian Transcarpathian record. Thus, finding some real industry variability endorses the classic French scheme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carpathian basin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">early upper paleolithic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aurignacian industry types</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">proto-aurignacian</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Archaeology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Škrdla, P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rácz, B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nemergut, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Béres, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice</subfield><subfield code="d">Editura Academiei Române, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">(2021), Seite 141-181</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078636841</subfield><subfield code="x">00765147</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:141-181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2021.2207</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d6741422700f43f282e2620734d1b09e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0076-5147</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">141-181</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4002237 |