Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China
The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Taiping LI [verfasserIn] Huimin BO [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Chinesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Shipin gongye ke-ji - The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:43 ; year:2022 ; number:14 ; pages:301-310 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ025948695 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ025948695 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307093636.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ025948695 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a chi | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a TP368-456 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Taiping LI |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a food safety | |
| 650 | 4 | |a supervision sampling efficiency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a unqualified rate of random sampling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a unqualified rate of supervision sampling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quantitative evaluation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Food processing and manufacture | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Huimin BO |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Shipin gongye ke-ji |d The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022 |g 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000150428 |x 10020306 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |g year:2022 |g number:14 |g pages:301-310 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 43 |j 2022 |e 14 |h 301-310 | ||
| author_variant |
t l tl h b hb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10020306:2022----::uniaievlainfuevsosmlnefceco |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
TP |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025948695 (DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi TP368-456 Taiping LI verfasserin aut Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. food safety supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling unqualified rate of supervision sampling quantitative evaluation Food processing and manufacture Huimin BO verfasserin aut In Shipin gongye ke-ji The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 (DE-627)DOAJ000150428 10020306 nnns volume:43 year:2022 number:14 pages:301-310 https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c kostenfrei http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 43 2022 14 301-310 |
| spelling |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025948695 (DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi TP368-456 Taiping LI verfasserin aut Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. food safety supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling unqualified rate of supervision sampling quantitative evaluation Food processing and manufacture Huimin BO verfasserin aut In Shipin gongye ke-ji The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 (DE-627)DOAJ000150428 10020306 nnns volume:43 year:2022 number:14 pages:301-310 https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c kostenfrei http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 43 2022 14 301-310 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025948695 (DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi TP368-456 Taiping LI verfasserin aut Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. food safety supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling unqualified rate of supervision sampling quantitative evaluation Food processing and manufacture Huimin BO verfasserin aut In Shipin gongye ke-ji The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 (DE-627)DOAJ000150428 10020306 nnns volume:43 year:2022 number:14 pages:301-310 https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c kostenfrei http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 43 2022 14 301-310 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025948695 (DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi TP368-456 Taiping LI verfasserin aut Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. food safety supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling unqualified rate of supervision sampling quantitative evaluation Food processing and manufacture Huimin BO verfasserin aut In Shipin gongye ke-ji The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 (DE-627)DOAJ000150428 10020306 nnns volume:43 year:2022 number:14 pages:301-310 https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c kostenfrei http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 43 2022 14 301-310 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 doi (DE-627)DOAJ025948695 (DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi TP368-456 Taiping LI verfasserin aut Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. food safety supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling unqualified rate of supervision sampling quantitative evaluation Food processing and manufacture Huimin BO verfasserin aut In Shipin gongye ke-ji The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 (DE-627)DOAJ000150428 10020306 nnns volume:43 year:2022 number:14 pages:301-310 https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c kostenfrei http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 43 2022 14 301-310 |
| language |
Chinese |
| source |
In Shipin gongye ke-ji 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 volume:43 year:2022 number:14 pages:301-310 |
| sourceStr |
In Shipin gongye ke-ji 43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310 volume:43 year:2022 number:14 pages:301-310 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
food safety supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling unqualified rate of supervision sampling quantitative evaluation Food processing and manufacture |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Shipin gongye ke-ji |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Taiping LI @@aut@@ Huimin BO @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ000150428 |
| id |
DOAJ025948695 |
| language_de |
chinesisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ025948695</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307093636.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ025948695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">chi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Taiping LI</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">food safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">supervision sampling efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unqualified rate of random sampling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unqualified rate of supervision sampling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quantitative evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huimin BO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Shipin gongye ke-ji</subfield><subfield code="d">The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000150428</subfield><subfield code="x">10020306</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:14</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:301-310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">14</subfield><subfield code="h">301-310</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
| author |
Taiping LI |
| spellingShingle |
Taiping LI misc TP368-456 misc food safety misc supervision sampling efficiency misc unqualified rate of random sampling misc unqualified rate of supervision sampling misc quantitative evaluation misc Food processing and manufacture Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China |
| authorStr |
Taiping LI |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ000150428 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
TP368-456 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
10020306 |
| topic_title |
TP368-456 Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China food safety supervision sampling efficiency unqualified rate of random sampling unqualified rate of supervision sampling quantitative evaluation |
| topic |
misc TP368-456 misc food safety misc supervision sampling efficiency misc unqualified rate of random sampling misc unqualified rate of supervision sampling misc quantitative evaluation misc Food processing and manufacture |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc TP368-456 misc food safety misc supervision sampling efficiency misc unqualified rate of random sampling misc unqualified rate of supervision sampling misc quantitative evaluation misc Food processing and manufacture |
| topic_browse |
misc TP368-456 misc food safety misc supervision sampling efficiency misc unqualified rate of random sampling misc unqualified rate of supervision sampling misc quantitative evaluation misc Food processing and manufacture |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Shipin gongye ke-ji |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ000150428 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Shipin gongye ke-ji |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ000150428 |
| title |
Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ025948695 (DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c |
| title_full |
Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China |
| author_sort |
Taiping LI |
| journal |
Shipin gongye ke-ji |
| journalStr |
Shipin gongye ke-ji |
| callnumber-first-code |
T |
| lang_code |
chi |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
301 |
| author_browse |
Taiping LI Huimin BO |
| container_volume |
43 |
| class |
TP368-456 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Taiping LI |
| doi_str_mv |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
quantitative evaluation of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in china |
| callnumber |
TP368-456 |
| title_auth |
Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China |
| abstract |
The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. |
| abstractGer |
The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
14 |
| title_short |
Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Huimin BO |
| author2Str |
Huimin BO |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ000150428 |
| callnumber-subject |
TP - Chemical Technology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174 |
| callnumber-a |
TP368-456 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T18:06:53.688Z |
| _version_ |
1803582191631859713 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ025948695</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307093636.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ025948695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">chi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Taiping LI</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quantitative Evaluation of Supervision Sampling Efficiency of Food Safety in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The supervision sampling efficiency of food safety is an important index to measure the ability of the government to find problem food and problem enterprises in the supervision and sampling process. It is of great significance to scientifically measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and random inspection to improve the government's supervision efficiency and consolidate the food safety strategy. Based on the internal logical relationship between the unqualified rate of random sampling and the unqualified rate of supervision sampling, this paper systematically constructs a method to measure the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling, and makes a quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of food safety supervision and sampling in China by using the data of 30 kinds of processed food supervision and sampling at 30 provincial levels. The results show that the overall level of supervision sampling efficiency of food safety in China from 2017 to 2019 is seriously low, and there are some inter provincial differences. Specifically, from 2017 to 2019, China’s average supervision sampling efficiency of food safety was only 0.8056, 0.8493 and 0.8673 respectively. Among them, the average annual growth rate of supervision sampling efficiency of 10 regions was negative. The number of regions with high and higher supervision sampling efficiency was less than 10, and gradually concentrated in the eastern coastal areas. Therefore, it is suggested that when carrying out food safety supervision and sampling, the government should earnestly adhere to the problem oriented principle and effectively improve the supervision sampling efficiency.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">food safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">supervision sampling efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unqualified rate of random sampling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unqualified rate of supervision sampling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quantitative evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huimin BO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Shipin gongye ke-ji</subfield><subfield code="d">The editorial department of Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">43(2022), 14, Seite 301-310</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000150428</subfield><subfield code="x">10020306</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:14</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:301-310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0c878d70e4f24489a171bf9b87eb956c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.spgykj.com/cn/article/doi/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021100174</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1002-0306</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">14</subfield><subfield code="h">301-310</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401908 |